Message ID | 20161205114015.GA17514@harukaze |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Needs a tracking bug, but otherwise looks fine. Hard to argue with test results.
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 07:56:03AM -0700, Tim Gardner wrote: > Needs a tracking bug, but otherwise looks fine. Hard to argue with test > results. BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647390 Is it ok or shall i append it & repull?
On 12/05/2016 08:10 AM, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 07:56:03AM -0700, Tim Gardner wrote: >> Needs a tracking bug, but otherwise looks fine. Hard to argue with test >> results. > > BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647390 > > Is it ok or shall i append it & repull? > Whomever applies can likely figure it out.
Applied to xenial raspi2 branch, after adding the missing buglinks. Cheers, -- Luís