From patchwork Mon Mar 7 22:50:33 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kamal Mostafa X-Patchwork-Id: 593599 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B681401CD; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:58:18 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ad46Q-0002R0-Sx; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:58:14 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ad446-00018F-Ci for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:55:50 +0000 Received: from 1.general.kamal.us.vpn ([10.172.68.52] helo=fourier) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ad445-0000b4-Uf; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:55:50 +0000 Received: from kamal by fourier with local (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1ad443-0002Am-7v; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:55:47 -0800 From: Kamal Mostafa To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 242/273] af_unix: Guard against other == sk in unix_dgram_sendmsg Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:50:33 -0800 Message-Id: <1457391064-6660-243-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.0 In-Reply-To: <1457391064-6660-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> References: <1457391064-6660-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 4.2 Cc: Kamal Mostafa , Rainer Weikusat , "David S . Miller" X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com 4.2.8-ckt5 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ---8<------------------------------------------------------------ From: Rainer Weikusat [ Upstream commit a5527dda344fff0514b7989ef7a755729769daa1 ] The unix_dgram_sendmsg routine use the following test if (unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) { to determine if sk and other are in an n:1 association (either established via connect or by using sendto to send messages to an unrelated socket identified by address). This isn't correct as the specified address could have been bound to the sending socket itself or because this socket could have been connected to itself by the time of the unix_peer_get but disconnected before the unix_state_lock(other). In both cases, the if-block would be entered despite other == sk which might either block the sender unintentionally or lead to trying to unlock the same spin lock twice for a non-blocking send. Add a other != sk check to guard against this. Fixes: 7d267278a9ec ("unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue") Reported-By: Philipp Hahn Signed-off-by: Rainer Weikusat Tested-by: Philipp Hahn Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa --- net/unix/af_unix.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c index 7c29ec3..b5f9049 100644 --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c @@ -1780,7 +1780,12 @@ restart_locked: goto out_unlock; } - if (unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) { + /* other == sk && unix_peer(other) != sk if + * - unix_peer(sk) == NULL, destination address bound to sk + * - unix_peer(sk) == sk by time of get but disconnected before lock + */ + if (other != sk && + unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) { if (timeo) { timeo = unix_wait_for_peer(other, timeo);