diff mbox

[4.2.y-ckt,stable] Patch "bonding: don't use stale speed and duplex information" has been added to the 4.2.y-ckt tree

Message ID 1457390199-5052-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Kamal Mostafa March 7, 2016, 10:36 p.m. UTC
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled

    bonding: don't use stale speed and duplex information

to the linux-4.2.y-queue branch of the 4.2.y-ckt extended stable tree 
which can be found at:

    http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/linux.git/log/?h=linux-4.2.y-queue

This patch is scheduled to be released in version 4.2.8-ckt5.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please 
reply to this email.

For more information about the 4.2.y-ckt tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable

Thanks.
-Kamal

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From 8084f44b5b1dbd161b4ac935196eecbab893b2dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:10:02 -0800
Subject: bonding: don't use stale speed and duplex information

commit 266b495f11d6706018f66250cb02a788ff2490d7 upstream.

There is presently a race condition between the bonding periodic
link monitor and the updating of a slave's speed and duplex.  The former
occurs on a periodic basis, and the latter in response to a driver's
calling of netif_carrier_on.

	It is possible for the periodic monitor to run between the
driver call of netif_carrier_on and the receipt of the NETDEV_CHANGE
event that causes bonding to update the slave's speed and duplex.  This
manifests most notably as a report that a slave is up and "0 Mbps full
duplex" after enslavement, but in principle could report an incorrect
speed and duplex after any link up event if the device comes up with a
different speed or duplex.  This affects the 802.3ad aggregator
selection, as the speed and duplex are selection criteria.

	This is fixed by updating the speed and duplex in the periodic
monitor, prior to using that information.

	This was done historically in bonding, but the call to
bond_update_speed_duplex was removed in commit 876254ae2758 ("bonding:
don't call update_speed_duplex() under spinlocks"), as it might sleep
under lock.  Later, the locking was changed to only hold RTNL, and so
after commit 876254ae2758 ("bonding: don't call update_speed_duplex()
under spinlocks") this call is again safe.

Tested-by: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@gmail.com>
Cc: dingtianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Fixes: 876254ae2758 ("bonding: don't call update_speed_duplex() under spinlocks")
Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--
2.7.0
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index ba0e359..197ee34 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2092,6 +2092,7 @@  static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
 			continue;

 		case BOND_LINK_UP:
+			bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
 			bond_set_slave_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_UP);
 			slave->last_link_up = jiffies;