From patchwork Mon Jun 10 22:04:38 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kamal Mostafa X-Patchwork-Id: 250398 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31A92C0089 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:06:01 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UmADs-0000aA-PU; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 22:05:56 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UmACf-0008Im-T8 for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 22:04:41 +0000 Received: from c-67-160-231-42.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([67.160.231.42] helo=fourier) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UmACe-0000Au-D3; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 22:04:40 +0000 Received: from kamal by fourier with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UmACc-0003YT-94; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:04:38 -0700 From: Kamal Mostafa To: Guenter Roeck Subject: [ 3.8.y.z extended stable ] Patch "hwmon: (adm1021) Strengthen chip detection for ADM1021, LM84 and" has been added to staging queue Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:04:38 -0700 Message-Id: <1370901878-13632-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.2 X-Extended-Stable: 3.8 Cc: Jean Delvare , Kamal Mostafa , kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled hwmon: (adm1021) Strengthen chip detection for ADM1021, LM84 and to the linux-3.8.y-queue branch of the 3.8.y.z extended stable tree which can be found at: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-3.8.y-queue This patch is scheduled to be released in version 3.8.13.3. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please reply to this email. For more information about the 3.8.y.z tree, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable Thanks. -Kamal ------ From fe5e962afdccf7e4e03e48eb84850da4cab90f80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guenter Roeck Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:09:30 -0700 Subject: hwmon: (adm1021) Strengthen chip detection for ADM1021, LM84 and MAX1617 commit 591bfcfc334a003ba31c0deff03b22e73349939b upstream. On a system with both MAX1617 and JC42 sensors, JC42 sensors can be misdetected as LM84. Strengthen detection sufficiently enough to avoid this misdetection. Also improve detection for ADM1021. Modeled after chip detection code in sensors-detect command. Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck Tested-by: Jean Delvare Acked-by: Jean Delvare Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa --- drivers/hwmon/adm1021.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 1.8.1.2 diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/adm1021.c b/drivers/hwmon/adm1021.c index fd1d1b1..f9df316 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/adm1021.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/adm1021.c @@ -332,26 +332,68 @@ static int adm1021_detect(struct i2c_client *client, man_id = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, ADM1021_REG_MAN_ID); dev_id = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, ADM1021_REG_DEV_ID); + if (man_id < 0 || dev_id < 0) + return -ENODEV; + if (man_id == 0x4d && dev_id == 0x01) type_name = "max1617a"; else if (man_id == 0x41) { if ((dev_id & 0xF0) == 0x30) type_name = "adm1023"; - else + else if ((dev_id & 0xF0) == 0x00) type_name = "adm1021"; + else + return -ENODEV; } else if (man_id == 0x49) type_name = "thmc10"; else if (man_id == 0x23) type_name = "gl523sm"; else if (man_id == 0x54) type_name = "mc1066"; - /* LM84 Mfr ID in a different place, and it has more unused bits */ - else if (conv_rate == 0x00 - && (config & 0x7F) == 0x00 - && (status & 0xAB) == 0x00) - type_name = "lm84"; - else - type_name = "max1617"; + else { + int lte, rte, lhi, rhi, llo, rlo; + + /* extra checks for LM84 and MAX1617 to avoid misdetections */ + + llo = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, ADM1021_REG_THYST_R(0)); + rlo = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, ADM1021_REG_THYST_R(1)); + + /* fail if any of the additional register reads failed */ + if (llo < 0 || rlo < 0) + return -ENODEV; + + lte = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, ADM1021_REG_TEMP(0)); + rte = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, ADM1021_REG_TEMP(1)); + lhi = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, ADM1021_REG_TOS_R(0)); + rhi = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, ADM1021_REG_TOS_R(1)); + + /* + * Fail for negative temperatures and negative high limits. + * This check also catches read errors on the tested registers. + */ + if ((s8)lte < 0 || (s8)rte < 0 || (s8)lhi < 0 || (s8)rhi < 0) + return -ENODEV; + + /* fail if all registers hold the same value */ + if (lte == rte && lte == lhi && lte == rhi && lte == llo + && lte == rlo) + return -ENODEV; + + /* + * LM84 Mfr ID is in a different place, + * and it has more unused bits. + */ + if (conv_rate == 0x00 + && (config & 0x7F) == 0x00 + && (status & 0xAB) == 0x00) { + type_name = "lm84"; + } else { + /* fail if low limits are larger than high limits */ + if ((s8)llo > lhi || (s8)rlo > rhi) + return -ENODEV; + type_name = "max1617"; + } + } pr_debug("adm1021: Detected chip %s at adapter %d, address 0x%02x.\n", type_name, i2c_adapter_id(adapter), client->addr);