mbox series

[SRU,N,0/1] CVE-2024-43882

Message ID 20240925014036.98880-1-koichiro.den@canonical.com
Headers show
Series CVE-2024-43882 | expand

Message

Koichiro Den Sept. 25, 2024, 1:40 a.m. UTC
[Impact]

exec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage

When opening a file for exec via do_filp_open(), permission checking is
done against the file's metadata at that moment, and on success, a file
pointer is passed back. Much later in the execve() code path, the file
metadata (specifically mode, uid, and gid) is used to determine if/how
to set the uid and gid. However, those values may have changed since the
permissions check, meaning the execution may gain unintended privileges.

For example, if a file could change permissions from executable and not
set-id:

---------x 1 root root 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target

to set-id and non-executable:

---S------ 1 root root 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target

it is possible to gain root privileges when execution should have been
disallowed.

While this race condition is rare in real-world scenarios, it has been
observed (and proven exploitable) when package managers are updating
the setuid bits of installed programs. Such files start with being
world-executable but then are adjusted to be group-exec with a set-uid
bit. For example, "chmod o-x,u+s target" makes "target" executable only
by uid "root" and gid "cdrom", while also becoming setuid-root:

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target

becomes:

-rwsr-xr-- 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target

But racing the chmod means users without group "cdrom" membership can
get the permission to execute "target" just before the chmod, and when
the chmod finishes, the exec reaches brpm_fill_uid(), and performs the
setuid to root, violating the expressed authorization of "only cdrom
group members can setuid to root".

Re-check that we still have execute permissions in case the metadata
has changed. It would be better to keep a copy from the perm-check time,
but until we can do that refactoring, the least-bad option is to do a
full inode_permission() call (under inode lock). It is understood that
this is safe against dead-locks, but hardly optimal.

[Fix]

Noble:  Clean cherry-pick
Jammy:  fixed via stable
Focal:  fixed via stable
Bionic: fix sent to esm ML
Xenial: fix sent to esm ML
Trusty: won't fix

[Test Case]

Compile and boot tested

[Where problems could occur]

This fix addresses issues which is generic in nature, an issue with this
fix would cause unexpected privilege escalation in rare race condition.


Kees Cook (1):
  exec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage

 fs/exec.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Mehmet Basaran Oct. 1, 2024, 8:32 p.m. UTC | #1
Acked-by: Mehmet Basaran <mehmet.basaran@canonical.com>
Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com> writes:

> [Impact]
>
> exec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage
>
> When opening a file for exec via do_filp_open(), permission checking is
> done against the file's metadata at that moment, and on success, a file
> pointer is passed back. Much later in the execve() code path, the file
> metadata (specifically mode, uid, and gid) is used to determine if/how
> to set the uid and gid. However, those values may have changed since the
> permissions check, meaning the execution may gain unintended privileges.
>
> For example, if a file could change permissions from executable and not
> set-id:
>
> ---------x 1 root root 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target
>
> to set-id and non-executable:
>
> ---S------ 1 root root 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target
>
> it is possible to gain root privileges when execution should have been
> disallowed.
>
> While this race condition is rare in real-world scenarios, it has been
> observed (and proven exploitable) when package managers are updating
> the setuid bits of installed programs. Such files start with being
> world-executable but then are adjusted to be group-exec with a set-uid
> bit. For example, "chmod o-x,u+s target" makes "target" executable only
> by uid "root" and gid "cdrom", while also becoming setuid-root:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target
>
> becomes:
>
> -rwsr-xr-- 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target
>
> But racing the chmod means users without group "cdrom" membership can
> get the permission to execute "target" just before the chmod, and when
> the chmod finishes, the exec reaches brpm_fill_uid(), and performs the
> setuid to root, violating the expressed authorization of "only cdrom
> group members can setuid to root".
>
> Re-check that we still have execute permissions in case the metadata
> has changed. It would be better to keep a copy from the perm-check time,
> but until we can do that refactoring, the least-bad option is to do a
> full inode_permission() call (under inode lock). It is understood that
> this is safe against dead-locks, but hardly optimal.
>
> [Fix]
>
> Noble:  Clean cherry-pick
> Jammy:  fixed via stable
> Focal:  fixed via stable
> Bionic: fix sent to esm ML
> Xenial: fix sent to esm ML
> Trusty: won't fix
>
> [Test Case]
>
> Compile and boot tested
>
> [Where problems could occur]
>
> This fix addresses issues which is generic in nature, an issue with this
> fix would cause unexpected privilege escalation in rare race condition.
>
>
> Kees Cook (1):
>   exec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage
>
>  fs/exec.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>
>
> -- 
> kernel-team mailing list
> kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
ivanhu Oct. 2, 2024, 4:56 a.m. UTC | #2
Acked-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu@canonical.com>


On 9/25/24 09:40, Koichiro Den wrote:
> [Impact]
> 
> exec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage
> 
> When opening a file for exec via do_filp_open(), permission checking is
> done against the file's metadata at that moment, and on success, a file
> pointer is passed back. Much later in the execve() code path, the file
> metadata (specifically mode, uid, and gid) is used to determine if/how
> to set the uid and gid. However, those values may have changed since the
> permissions check, meaning the execution may gain unintended privileges.
> 
> For example, if a file could change permissions from executable and not
> set-id:
> 
> ---------x 1 root root 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target
> 
> to set-id and non-executable:
> 
> ---S------ 1 root root 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target
> 
> it is possible to gain root privileges when execution should have been
> disallowed.
> 
> While this race condition is rare in real-world scenarios, it has been
> observed (and proven exploitable) when package managers are updating
> the setuid bits of installed programs. Such files start with being
> world-executable but then are adjusted to be group-exec with a set-uid
> bit. For example, "chmod o-x,u+s target" makes "target" executable only
> by uid "root" and gid "cdrom", while also becoming setuid-root:
> 
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target
> 
> becomes:
> 
> -rwsr-xr-- 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target
> 
> But racing the chmod means users without group "cdrom" membership can
> get the permission to execute "target" just before the chmod, and when
> the chmod finishes, the exec reaches brpm_fill_uid(), and performs the
> setuid to root, violating the expressed authorization of "only cdrom
> group members can setuid to root".
> 
> Re-check that we still have execute permissions in case the metadata
> has changed. It would be better to keep a copy from the perm-check time,
> but until we can do that refactoring, the least-bad option is to do a
> full inode_permission() call (under inode lock). It is understood that
> this is safe against dead-locks, but hardly optimal.
> 
> [Fix]
> 
> Noble:  Clean cherry-pick
> Jammy:  fixed via stable
> Focal:  fixed via stable
> Bionic: fix sent to esm ML
> Xenial: fix sent to esm ML
> Trusty: won't fix
> 
> [Test Case]
> 
> Compile and boot tested
> 
> [Where problems could occur]
> 
> This fix addresses issues which is generic in nature, an issue with this
> fix would cause unexpected privilege escalation in rare race condition.
> 
> 
> Kees Cook (1):
>    exec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage
> 
>   fs/exec.c | 8 +++++++-
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Roxana Nicolescu Oct. 7, 2024, 7:36 a.m. UTC | #3
On 25/09/2024 03:40, Koichiro Den wrote:
> [Impact]
>
> exec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage
>
> When opening a file for exec via do_filp_open(), permission checking is
> done against the file's metadata at that moment, and on success, a file
> pointer is passed back. Much later in the execve() code path, the file
> metadata (specifically mode, uid, and gid) is used to determine if/how
> to set the uid and gid. However, those values may have changed since the
> permissions check, meaning the execution may gain unintended privileges.
>
> For example, if a file could change permissions from executable and not
> set-id:
>
> ---------x 1 root root 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target
>
> to set-id and non-executable:
>
> ---S------ 1 root root 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target
>
> it is possible to gain root privileges when execution should have been
> disallowed.
>
> While this race condition is rare in real-world scenarios, it has been
> observed (and proven exploitable) when package managers are updating
> the setuid bits of installed programs. Such files start with being
> world-executable but then are adjusted to be group-exec with a set-uid
> bit. For example, "chmod o-x,u+s target" makes "target" executable only
> by uid "root" and gid "cdrom", while also becoming setuid-root:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target
>
> becomes:
>
> -rwsr-xr-- 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug  7 13:16 target
>
> But racing the chmod means users without group "cdrom" membership can
> get the permission to execute "target" just before the chmod, and when
> the chmod finishes, the exec reaches brpm_fill_uid(), and performs the
> setuid to root, violating the expressed authorization of "only cdrom
> group members can setuid to root".
>
> Re-check that we still have execute permissions in case the metadata
> has changed. It would be better to keep a copy from the perm-check time,
> but until we can do that refactoring, the least-bad option is to do a
> full inode_permission() call (under inode lock). It is understood that
> this is safe against dead-locks, but hardly optimal.
>
> [Fix]
>
> Noble:  Clean cherry-pick
> Jammy:  fixed via stable
> Focal:  fixed via stable
> Bionic: fix sent to esm ML
> Xenial: fix sent to esm ML
> Trusty: won't fix
>
> [Test Case]
>
> Compile and boot tested
>
> [Where problems could occur]
>
> This fix addresses issues which is generic in nature, an issue with this
> fix would cause unexpected privilege escalation in rare race condition.
>
>
> Kees Cook (1):
>    exec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage
>
>   fs/exec.c | 8 +++++++-
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Applied to noble:linux master-next branch. Thanks!