Message ID | 20200115091428.32502-1-stefan.bader@canonical.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | (Re)apply RAID0 layout support | expand |
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:14:22AM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: > So here is the set of patches Dann already sent for B/D/E backported to > Xenial (#1-#5). There is one additional SAUCE patch (#6) which changes > the behavior to keep using the layout that was used before and just warn > about that in syslog. That patch is the same for X/B/D/E and should be > added to the set Dann sent for the other releases. > > With that we can roll out the layout support without breaking anybody (at > least not worse than anybody already is). Then follow up with user-space > without having to worry about dependencies. > > Using the 6 patch sets, this could again be staged for the next cylcle. I assume we also want patch 6 applied to focal/unstable? Thanks, Seth
Acked-by: Marcelo Henrique Cerri <marcelo.cerri@canonical.com>
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:14:22AM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: > So here is the set of patches Dann already sent for B/D/E backported to > Xenial (#1-#5). There is one additional SAUCE patch (#6) which changes > the behavior to keep using the layout that was used before and just warn > about that in syslog. That patch is the same for X/B/D/E and should be > added to the set Dann sent for the other releases. > > With that we can roll out the layout support without breaking anybody (at > least not worse than anybody already is). Then follow up with user-space > without having to worry about dependencies. > > Using the 6 patch sets, this could again be staged for the next cylcle. Never saw a response to my question about this for focal, however it seems unlikely that we wouldn't want it there as well. Applied the sauce patch only to focal/master-next and unstable/master, thanks!