Message ID | 20240906-j784s4-esm-enable-v1-2-b83b17d5a744@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | RFC |
Delegated to: | Tom Rini |
Headers | show |
Series | k3-j784s4-r5-evm: Enable ESMs and related PMIC | expand |
Hi Andrew, On 9/7/2024 2:54 AM, Andrew Halaney wrote: > From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> > > Initialize the ESM & PMIC ESM. This allows things like > the watchdog to reset the board when tripped. > > Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> > Link: https://git.ti.com/cgit/ti-u-boot/ti-u-boot/commit/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c?h=ti-u-boot-2024.04&id=9d8b40958ce792808bc571d828197dbc2e7978d6 > [halaney: add a line to the commit message, include header] > Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com> > --- > board/ti/j784s4/evm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c b/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c > index 548dbd5925d..a0ef3a44536 100644 > --- a/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c > +++ b/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > * > */ > > +#include <dm.h> > #include <efi_loader.h> > #include <init.h> > #include <spl.h> > @@ -72,4 +73,31 @@ int board_late_init(void) > > void spl_board_init(void) > { > + struct udevice *dev; > + int ret; > + > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_K3)) { > + ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@700000", > + &dev); > + if (ret) > + printf("MISC init for esm@700000 failed: %d\n", ret); > + > + ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@40800000", > + &dev); > + if (ret) > + printf("MISC init for esm@40800000 failed: %d\n", ret); > + > + ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@42080000", > + &dev); > + if (ret) > + printf("MISC init for esm@42080000 failed: %d\n", ret); > + } Thanks for patch , IMO, if one of esm is failing then we can skip other esm probe, > + > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_PMIC)) { > + ret = uclass_get_device_by_driver(UCLASS_MISC, > + DM_DRIVER_GET(pmic_esm), > + &dev); Same here if esm probe is successful then only we should probe pmic_esm. Reason is , if any of probe is failing functionality will not work and there is no point to probe devices, if function is not working. > + if (ret) > + printf("ESM PMIC init failed: %d\n", ret); > + } > } >
On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 11:12:05AM GMT, Kumar, Udit wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 9/7/2024 2:54 AM, Andrew Halaney wrote: > > From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> > > > > Initialize the ESM & PMIC ESM. This allows things like > > the watchdog to reset the board when tripped. > > > > Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> > > Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> > > Link: https://git.ti.com/cgit/ti-u-boot/ti-u-boot/commit/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c?h=ti-u-boot-2024.04&id=9d8b40958ce792808bc571d828197dbc2e7978d6 > > [halaney: add a line to the commit message, include header] > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com> > > --- > > board/ti/j784s4/evm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c b/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c > > index 548dbd5925d..a0ef3a44536 100644 > > --- a/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c > > +++ b/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > > * > > */ > > +#include <dm.h> > > #include <efi_loader.h> > > #include <init.h> > > #include <spl.h> > > @@ -72,4 +73,31 @@ int board_late_init(void) > > void spl_board_init(void) > > { > > + struct udevice *dev; > > + int ret; > > + > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_K3)) { > > + ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@700000", > > + &dev); > > + if (ret) > > + printf("MISC init for esm@700000 failed: %d\n", ret); > > + > > + ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@40800000", > > + &dev); > > + if (ret) > > + printf("MISC init for esm@40800000 failed: %d\n", ret); > > + > > + ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@42080000", > > + &dev); > > + if (ret) > > + printf("MISC init for esm@42080000 failed: %d\n", ret); > > + } > > Thanks for patch , > > IMO, if one of esm is failing then we can skip other esm probe, > > > + > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_PMIC)) { > > + ret = uclass_get_device_by_driver(UCLASS_MISC, > > + DM_DRIVER_GET(pmic_esm), > > + &dev); > > Same here if esm probe is successful then only we should probe pmic_esm. > > Reason is , if any of probe is failing functionality will not work and > > there is no point to probe devices, if function is not working. Any preference on how this is handled? I was going to do something like: if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_K3)) { ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@700000", &dev); if (ret) { printf("MISC init for esm@700000 failed: %d\n", ret); return; } ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@40800000", &dev); ... if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_PMIC)) { ret = uclass_get_device_by_driver(UCLASS_MISC, DM_DRIVER_GET(pmic_esm), &dev); if (ret) { printf("ESM PMIC init failed: %d\n", ret); return; } } } but wasn't sure if a err_esm label and goto would be more in line with what you imagined? Let me know otherwise I'll just submit this version tomorrow or so. Thanks, Andrew
On 9/10/2024 10:52 PM, Andrew Halaney wrote: > On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 11:12:05AM GMT, Kumar, Udit wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> On 9/7/2024 2:54 AM, Andrew Halaney wrote: >>> From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> >>> >>> Initialize the ESM & PMIC ESM. This allows things like >>> the watchdog to reset the board when tripped. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> >>> Link: https://git.ti.com/cgit/ti-u-boot/ti-u-boot/commit/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c?h=ti-u-boot-2024.04&id=9d8b40958ce792808bc571d828197dbc2e7978d6 >>> [halaney: add a line to the commit message, include header] >>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> board/ti/j784s4/evm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c b/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c >>> index 548dbd5925d..a0ef3a44536 100644 >>> --- a/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c >>> +++ b/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c >>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ >>> * >>> */ >>> +#include <dm.h> >>> #include <efi_loader.h> >>> #include <init.h> >>> #include <spl.h> >>> @@ -72,4 +73,31 @@ int board_late_init(void) >>> void spl_board_init(void) >>> { >>> + struct udevice *dev; >>> + int ret; >>> + >>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_K3)) { >>> + ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@700000", >>> + &dev); >>> + if (ret) >>> + printf("MISC init for esm@700000 failed: %d\n", ret); >>> + >>> + ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@40800000", >>> + &dev); >>> + if (ret) >>> + printf("MISC init for esm@40800000 failed: %d\n", ret); >>> + >>> + ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@42080000", >>> + &dev); >>> + if (ret) >>> + printf("MISC init for esm@42080000 failed: %d\n", ret); >>> + } >> Thanks for patch , >> >> IMO, if one of esm is failing then we can skip other esm probe, >> >>> + >>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_PMIC)) { >>> + ret = uclass_get_device_by_driver(UCLASS_MISC, >>> + DM_DRIVER_GET(pmic_esm), >>> + &dev); >> Same here if esm probe is successful then only we should probe pmic_esm. >> >> Reason is , if any of probe is failing functionality will not work and >> >> there is no point to probe devices, if function is not working. > Any preference on how this is handled? I was going to do something like: > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_K3)) { > ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@700000", > &dev); > if (ret) { > printf("MISC init for esm@700000 failed: %d\n", ret); > return; > } What I have in mind kind of having string array with name , as esm@700000, esm@40800000 and esm@42080000 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_K3)) { for(i = 0 ; i< 2; i++) { ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, STRING[i], &dev); if(ret) { printf("MISC init for %s failed: %d\n", ret, STRING[i]); break; } } } if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_PMIC) && ret == 0) { ret = uclass_get_device_by_driver(UCLASS_MISC, DM_DRIVER_GET(pmic_esm), &dev); .... } ... .... > ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@40800000", > &dev); > ... > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_PMIC)) { > ret = uclass_get_device_by_driver(UCLASS_MISC, > DM_DRIVER_GET(pmic_esm), > &dev); > if (ret) { > printf("ESM PMIC init failed: %d\n", ret); > return; > } > } > } > > but wasn't sure if a err_esm label and goto would be more in line with > what you imagined? Let me know otherwise I'll just submit this version > tomorrow or so. > > Thanks, > Andrew >
diff --git a/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c b/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c index 548dbd5925d..a0ef3a44536 100644 --- a/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c +++ b/board/ti/j784s4/evm.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ * */ +#include <dm.h> #include <efi_loader.h> #include <init.h> #include <spl.h> @@ -72,4 +73,31 @@ int board_late_init(void) void spl_board_init(void) { + struct udevice *dev; + int ret; + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_K3)) { + ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@700000", + &dev); + if (ret) + printf("MISC init for esm@700000 failed: %d\n", ret); + + ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@40800000", + &dev); + if (ret) + printf("MISC init for esm@40800000 failed: %d\n", ret); + + ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_MISC, "esm@42080000", + &dev); + if (ret) + printf("MISC init for esm@42080000 failed: %d\n", ret); + } + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ESM_PMIC)) { + ret = uclass_get_device_by_driver(UCLASS_MISC, + DM_DRIVER_GET(pmic_esm), + &dev); + if (ret) + printf("ESM PMIC init failed: %d\n", ret); + } }