From patchwork Thu Jul 4 07:35:11 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sughosh Ganu X-Patchwork-Id: 1956659 X-Patchwork-Delegate: trini@ti.com Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.denx.de (client-ip=2a01:238:438b:c500:173d:9f52:ddab:ee01; helo=phobos.denx.de; envelope-from=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [IPv6:2a01:238:438b:c500:173d:9f52:ddab:ee01]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WF7nP3ZHLz1xpP for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 17:39:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2D68881D; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:37:03 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id ED661888F5; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:37:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on phobos.denx.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2188890F for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:36:59 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=sughosh.ganu@linaro.org Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49381367; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 00:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from a079122.blr.arm.com (a079122.arm.com [10.162.17.48]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 251703F762; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 00:36:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Sughosh Ganu To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Tom Rini , Ilias Apalodimas , Heinrich Schuchardt , Simon Glass , Marek Vasut , Mark Kettenis , Fabio Estevam , Michal Simek , Sughosh Ganu Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 15/48] test: lmb: remove the test for max regions Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:05:11 +0530 Message-Id: <20240704073544.670249-16-sughosh.ganu@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240704073544.670249-1-sughosh.ganu@linaro.org> References: <20240704073544.670249-1-sughosh.ganu@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean The LMB memory map is now persistent and global, and the CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS config symbol has now been removed. Remove the corresponding lmb test case. Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu Reviewed-by: Simon Glass Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas --- Changes since V1: New patch test/lib/lmb.c | 67 -------------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 67 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/lib/lmb.c b/test/lib/lmb.c index 9f6b5633a7..a3a7ad904c 100644 --- a/test/lib/lmb.c +++ b/test/lib/lmb.c @@ -648,73 +648,6 @@ static int lib_test_lmb_get_free_size(struct unit_test_state *uts) } LIB_TEST(lib_test_lmb_get_free_size, 0); -#ifdef CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS -static int lib_test_lmb_max_regions(struct unit_test_state *uts) -{ - const phys_addr_t ram = 0x00000000; - /* - * All of 32bit memory space will contain regions for this test, so - * we need to scale ram_size (which in this case is the size of the lmb - * region) to match. - */ - const phys_size_t ram_size = ((0xFFFFFFFF >> CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS) - + 1) * CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS; - const phys_size_t blk_size = 0x10000; - phys_addr_t offset; - int ret, i; - - ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, 0); - ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.max, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS); - ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, 0); - ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.max, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS); - - /* Add CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS memory regions */ - for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS; i++) { - offset = ram + 2 * i * ram_size; - ret = lmb_add(offset, ram_size); - ut_asserteq(ret, 0); - } - ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS); - ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, 0); - - /* error for the (CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS + 1) memory regions */ - offset = ram + 2 * (CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS + 1) * ram_size; - ret = lmb_add(offset, ram_size); - ut_asserteq(ret, -1); - - ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS); - ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, 0); - - /* reserve CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS regions */ - for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS; i++) { - offset = ram + 2 * i * blk_size; - ret = lmb_reserve(offset, blk_size); - ut_asserteq(ret, 0); - } - - ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS); - ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS); - - /* error for the 9th reserved blocks */ - offset = ram + 2 * (CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS + 1) * blk_size; - ret = lmb_reserve(offset, blk_size); - ut_asserteq(ret, -1); - - ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS); - ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS); - - /* check each regions */ - for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS; i++) - ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.region[i].base, ram + 2 * i * ram_size); - - for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS; i++) - ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.region[i].base, ram + 2 * i * blk_size); - - return 0; -} -LIB_TEST(lib_test_lmb_max_regions, 0); -#endif - static int lib_test_lmb_flags(struct unit_test_state *uts) { const phys_addr_t ram = 0x40000000;