mbox series

[RFC,v3,0/2] FIT documentation link vs copy

Message ID 20240708153941.1045588-1-sam.povilus@amd.com
Headers show
Series FIT documentation link vs copy | expand

Message

Sam Povilus July 8, 2024, 3:39 p.m. UTC
I'm proposing linking the FIT documentation instead of double book keeping it, it does have the disadvantage of making it more difficult to see the documentation especially if offline. 

v2: update table of contents instead of removing
v3: remove duplicate entries, provide commit message

Sam Povilus (2):
  doc: Remove FIT documentation that is elsewhere
  doc: add missing table of content links

 doc/usage/fit/index.rst              |  26 +-
 doc/usage/fit/source_file_format.rst | 682 +--------------------------
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 685 deletions(-)