Message ID | 20240205190858.3076363-1-tharvey@gateworks.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | update venice dts | expand |
Hi Tim, On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 4:09 PM Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> wrote: > > This series brings some recent upstream Linux dt updates into U-Boot for > the Gateworks Venice family. Please specify what "some recent upstream Linux dt" means. Is it 6.8-rc, linux-next, or Shawn's tree? Can't you instead sync the imx8mm-venice DTs in U-Boot with this kernel tree? > Tim Harvey (5): > arm: dts: imx8mm-venice-gw7901: add digital I/O direction control GPIO's > arm: dts: imx8mm-venice-gw7901: add TPM device > arm: dts: imx8mm-venice-gw71xx: fix USB OTG VBUS > arm: dts: imx8mm-venice-gw71xx: add TPM device > arm: dts: imx8mp-venice-gw71xx: add TPM device > > .../dts/imx8mm-venice-gw71xx-0x-u-boot.dtsi | 7 ++++ > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw71xx.dtsi | 40 +++++++++---------- > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw7901-u-boot.dtsi | 14 +++++++ Why is u-boot.dtsi being touched? Please add a justification. > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw7901.dts | 14 ++++++- > .../dts/imx8mp-venice-gw71xx-2x-u-boot.dtsi | 9 +++++ Same here.
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 11:22 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 4:09 PM Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> wrote: > > > > This series brings some recent upstream Linux dt updates into U-Boot for > > the Gateworks Venice family. > > Please specify what "some recent upstream Linux dt" means. > > Is it 6.8-rc, linux-next, or Shawn's tree? > > Can't you instead sync the imx8mm-venice DTs in U-Boot with this kernel tree? > > > Tim Harvey (5): > > arm: dts: imx8mm-venice-gw7901: add digital I/O direction control GPIO's > > arm: dts: imx8mm-venice-gw7901: add TPM device > > arm: dts: imx8mm-venice-gw71xx: fix USB OTG VBUS > > arm: dts: imx8mm-venice-gw71xx: add TPM device > > arm: dts: imx8mp-venice-gw71xx: add TPM device > > > > .../dts/imx8mm-venice-gw71xx-0x-u-boot.dtsi | 7 ++++ > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw71xx.dtsi | 40 +++++++++---------- > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw7901-u-boot.dtsi | 14 +++++++ > > Why is u-boot.dtsi being touched? Please add a justification. > > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw7901.dts | 14 ++++++- > > .../dts/imx8mp-venice-gw71xx-2x-u-boot.dtsi | 9 +++++ > > Same here. Fabio, Ok, makes sense - drop this series. I will send a single patch instead with more detail if needed in the commit log. Best regards, Tim
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 12:19:47PM -0800, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 11:22 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Tim, > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 4:09 PM Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> wrote: > > > > > > This series brings some recent upstream Linux dt updates into U-Boot for > > > the Gateworks Venice family. > > > > Please specify what "some recent upstream Linux dt" means. > > > > Is it 6.8-rc, linux-next, or Shawn's tree? > > > > Can't you instead sync the imx8mm-venice DTs in U-Boot with this kernel tree? > > > > > Tim Harvey (5): > > > arm: dts: imx8mm-venice-gw7901: add digital I/O direction control GPIO's > > > arm: dts: imx8mm-venice-gw7901: add TPM device > > > arm: dts: imx8mm-venice-gw71xx: fix USB OTG VBUS > > > arm: dts: imx8mm-venice-gw71xx: add TPM device > > > arm: dts: imx8mp-venice-gw71xx: add TPM device > > > > > > .../dts/imx8mm-venice-gw71xx-0x-u-boot.dtsi | 7 ++++ > > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw71xx.dtsi | 40 +++++++++---------- > > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw7901-u-boot.dtsi | 14 +++++++ > > > > Why is u-boot.dtsi being touched? Please add a justification. > > > > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw7901.dts | 14 ++++++- > > > .../dts/imx8mp-venice-gw71xx-2x-u-boot.dtsi | 9 +++++ > > > > Same here. > > Fabio, > > Ok, makes sense - drop this series. I will send a single patch instead > with more detail if needed in the commit log. Can you please look at https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=393337&state=* and work on top of that? I would like to pull that in to v2024.04, still, and that will be a better long term path for your platforms as well. And if it looks like it would be a problem, getting that kind of feedback now is also appreciated. Thanks!