From patchwork Sun May 5 21:36:28 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Karsten Merker X-Patchwork-Id: 1095567 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=lists.denx.de (client-ip=81.169.180.215; helo=lists.denx.de; envelope-from=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Received: from lists.denx.de (dione.denx.de [81.169.180.215]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44xzjJ2R1mz9s5c for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 07:37:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: by lists.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 105) id CF465C21E0D; Sun, 5 May 2019 21:36:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lists.denx.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from lists.denx.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B22C21CB6; Sun, 5 May 2019 21:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 105) id 65591C21C38; Sun, 5 May 2019 21:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.13]) by lists.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04A9EC21C38 for ; Sun, 5 May 2019 21:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from excalibur.cnev.de ([213.196.205.91]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue108 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M89TB-1hQxBT3ZRL-005Kdu; Sun, 05 May 2019 23:36:32 +0200 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=excalibur.cnev.de) by excalibur.cnev.de with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hNOoC-0005mw-89; Sun, 05 May 2019 23:36:32 +0200 From: Karsten Merker To: Bin Meng , u-boot@lists.denx.de Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 23:36:28 +0200 Message-Id: <20190505213629.22208-1-merker@debian.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:zWKJct11SOXhvYoQpR0rSxi66ls+AwzuoN6Lb/WmFDgGeAXuw1w /YwYJVmgTtHlU9DrKXr4gmBLWhSRMQmHkHrfIDuFaFjfJTGZNhkz7dFzw9HRZUF1ENJ0r8v lLGx9ii6KF8e2rUG/l1YtpGZWkAQwm/5YWMPXDpNWm+i/+sR0b327TaIYPYxIaNo7jAgD65 N3hqDvj3lu4jtBG94k8PQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; V03:K0:BL6EE99clCI=:fOC7MK5Kc0K6IwLQwfJv5f sBEBYNt60zQxjoRQGy+/zUKPDInFUUxWxc5UNxM71nFFjLs29Bz57kwMgehq0ivky7tV803sU AzDMs72hIZjupx9Iet7Xr6VsbDM+559uC9usr/x0hsIBfPyYog/8YF0G/w5fo44HRMr4IsNtc aqrK+vDsJIXq0MFFDs0vh57LqMVsT8Vx0g1A8sA/aCYki4SRg8pXqYXpwgl7HnLYeHqDX579k 16sGWaRVCH7Jd8vMNPTnF7LiUum0fCmRYwqTexflnZwvw9Uc/OQmLSx/1IVpCHPeH6g/9KNhT hZGVxtVkPaozJHu/7L3h4+J4waHcvTddmDlVNvQaPu4c71nk21KkMuOdJeSLMrpkiClHcj5Wc Fr6cYQSj2pMscqnJHG0YIILx/0hKvwrWGiczn1M5zXRKUe6gpN4E/BWHtbFwSLpjE7Zb6n18s yKBAJomBWrBoqRqy4G0rUg5L+7ao8tyK/I/yRMZdsN5Tshy6cmFkBQ6lQRIGeCgVHqljS92af 6AnD9OCY/KXlzvdnJ7rOcCvsY2G4inWAdfo/QUrBNMn7nUBhKp11PIOqwl8e+gf1sR3jV9UtA FoLOY4TDmAtfHV0u0EJaJ+vzy/rMXOwMawS4i48L49zJDj4Hah2c+lp9LeRbS5kfkbuG4DBUw XRB79dduT/wKKLf2R/c+CYrka9Or0VSQC/eve2Qed8TNweA/GI1UB7/z5GsCNEVFZXUjeHcjw ZH0eBnFZEbVQiSLd5+RNipIgitFnI4CtECaYVg== Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/1] riscv: qemu-riscv environment size X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" Hello, currently the environment size for the qemu-riscv platform is set to only 4kB. The default environment (with distro_bootcmd support) has already nearly 4kB, so defining additional environment variables very quickly exceeds the allocated space. Is there a specific reason to use only 4kB for the environment? If not, I would like to propose to increase the environment size to 128kB similar to what we have on a number of other platforms. Regards, Karsten Karsten Merker (1): riscv: increase the environment size for the qemu-riscv platform to 128kB include/configs/qemu-riscv.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)