@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
#include <asm/oplib.h>
#include <asm/idprom.h>
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
#include <asm/openprom.h>
#include <asm/oplib.h>
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+
#include <asm/openprom.h>
#include <asm/oplib.h>
#include <asm/auxio.h>
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
*/
#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+
#include <asm/openprom.h>
#include <asm/oplib.h>
#include <asm/types.h>
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/ctype.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
#include <asm/openprom.h>
#include <asm/oplib.h>
@@ -210,7 +211,7 @@ int prom_searchsiblings(int node_start, char *nodename)
return 0;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(prom_searchsiblinbs);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(prom_searchsiblings);
/* Interal version of nextprop that does not alter return values. */
char * __prom_nextprop(int node, char * oprop)
sparc: Add includes missing from sparc_ksyms_*.c minimisation And fix a typo. Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com> --- And of course, these little bits managed to slip through my build tests. (You're saying: with a bug like the one in tree_32.c, how the hell can he claim build tests? Well I thought they were sparc32, but they were sparc64 thanks to the recent Kconfig change) So, after I'm all done and dusted, I kick off my randconfig runs and the first one, the *first* *damn* *one* fails with these issues. Thanks, Julian Calaby --- arch/sparc/kernel/idprom.c | 1 + arch/sparc/prom/init_32.c | 1 + arch/sparc/prom/misc_32.c | 2 ++ arch/sparc/prom/ranges.c | 2 ++ arch/sparc/prom/tree_32.c | 3 ++- 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)