Message ID | 20220508024351.110391-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | sparc32: srmmu: Fix typo in a comment | expand |
On Sun, 2022-05-08 at 10:43 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > The double `hush' in the comment in line 1186 is repeated. Remove one > of them from the comment. [] > diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c [] > @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static void __init init_swift(void) > srmmu_modtype = Swift_lots_o_bugs; > hwbug_bitmask |= (HWBUG_KERN_ACCBROKEN | HWBUG_KERN_CBITBROKEN); > /* > - * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush hush about > + * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush about This is not really a repeated word. do a google search on "hush hush" It _might_ sometimes use a dash, like 'hush-hush'
diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c index a9aa6a92c7fe..da6fd141662b 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static void __init init_swift(void) srmmu_modtype = Swift_lots_o_bugs; hwbug_bitmask |= (HWBUG_KERN_ACCBROKEN | HWBUG_KERN_CBITBROKEN); /* - * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush hush about + * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush about * this hardware bug... really braindamage stuff going * on here. However I think we can find a way to avoid * all of the workaround overhead under Linux. Basically,
The double `hush' in the comment in line 1186 is repeated. Remove one of them from the comment. Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@cdjrlc.com> --- arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)