diff mbox

HOLES_IN_ZONE...

Message ID 20090205180617.8ee3dfb5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
State RFC
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Feb. 5, 2009, 9:06 a.m. UTC 
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:26:51 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> The point of this email is, do I really need to set this thing on
> sparc64?  I've never seen this check triggered before, it only seems
> to have started triggering in 2.6.27 or so but I obviously can't find
> anything that would influence something of this nature.
> 

Clarifing my e-mail again..(sorry for bad text.)

1. This is not problem from HOLES_IN_ZONE.
2. Your end_pfn(0x81f7ff)'s memmap is not initialized correctly.
3. It's because 0x81f7ff has memmap but not in early_node_map[].

So, initialzing mem_map() for this end_pfn is necessary.

This is my patch. Mel, how do you think ?
==

A struct page for pfn which is not in early_node_map[] can exist and
it's not be initalized.

This patch changes early_pfn_to_nid() to return -1 and if -1 returns,
initialized mem_map with passed nid. After this patch, the page will be
marked as PG_reserved and never freed later.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

David Miller Feb. 5, 2009, 9:21 a.m. UTC | #1 
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:06:17 +0900

> @@ -2632,7 +2633,8 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned
>  		if (context == MEMMAP_EARLY) {
>  			if (!early_pfn_valid(pfn))
>  				continue;
> -			if (!early_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid))
> +			tmp = early_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid);
> +			if (tmp > -1 && tmp != nid)

early_pfn_in_nid() returns true or false, not the found nid

I think you meant to change this to call early_pfn_to_nid()

I'll make that correction and test your patch.

BTW, if you make that conversion there is no need for
early_pfn_in_nid() since there will be no other users.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Feb03/mm/page_alloc.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.29-Feb03.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.29-Feb03/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2618,6 +2618,7 @@  void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned
 	unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + size;
 	unsigned long pfn;
 	struct zone *z;
+	int tmp;
 
 	if (highest_memmap_pfn < end_pfn - 1)
 		highest_memmap_pfn = end_pfn - 1;
@@ -2632,7 +2633,8 @@  void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned
 		if (context == MEMMAP_EARLY) {
 			if (!early_pfn_valid(pfn))
 				continue;
-			if (!early_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid))
+			tmp = early_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid);
+			if (tmp > -1 && tmp != nid)
 				continue;
 		}
 		page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
@@ -2999,8 +3001,9 @@  int __meminit early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned 
 			return early_node_map[i].nid;
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	return -1;
 }
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID */
 
 /* Basic iterator support to walk early_node_map[] */