Message ID | 20110413161107.17837.3529.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6 |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | c3291f5d18445cd91b540342d31d76254b32376c |
Headers | show |
Hi Guilherme, > If you write a test for, say, the bundle form of a patch list, you'd still > have to specify the 'no change' value to other form (e.g. the multiple update > one) fields using MultipleBooleanField or else it'd raise a ValueError when > field.clean() is called as part of form._get_errors(). Applied, thanks. Looks like I just hit this with bundle updates too. Cheers, Jeremy
diff --git a/apps/patchwork/forms.py b/apps/patchwork/forms.py index 2c57c08..e069fe9 100644 --- a/apps/patchwork/forms.py +++ b/apps/patchwork/forms.py @@ -187,8 +187,8 @@ class MultipleBooleanField(forms.ChoiceField): return False def to_python(self, value): - if self.is_no_change(value): - return value + if value is None or self.is_no_change(value): + return self.no_change_choice[0] elif value == 'True': return True elif value == 'False':
If you write a test for, say, the bundle form of a patch list, you'd still have to specify the 'no change' value to other form (e.g. the multiple update one) fields using MultipleBooleanField or else it'd raise a ValueError when field.clean() is called as part of form._get_errors(). Signed-off-by: Guilherme Salgado <guilherme.salgado@linaro.org> --- apps/patchwork/forms.py | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)