Message ID | 6dca011f426c4678166ad4b452112ba15207e1c5.1664830160.git.sander@svanheule.net |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Sander Vanheule |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <openwrt-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.openwrt.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.openwrt.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=openwrt-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.openwrt.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=rkDZZGgS; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=svanheule.net header.i=@svanheule.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail1707 header.b=Ax6hCVOs; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MhCmh39cPz23jR for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 07:56:20 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=IAssj9T1hZnsNbFoR5Kz3OXvs9cvz4DskIJB0ku8xUo=; b=rkDZZGgSjH/DEc ME1nK9T5OsDIugmnWtxbUQEc1/xWgJN5Ps9Q5bVYwluJ6UuSQ5rdFlQDM3YnVzxIyyQHwOzOfTIPE JY6hnkoeQ4KbAWk9qITNUVVmDVQvFKusMFmE6UI+92MYy9GNqSKP3kKf+8azdonqlPCsxt42eFMhL anS0QamGv8kDxH64WXrrh/ddMMFZ/7Oe5GDxUY5dox5Os8vfttL8FNiV+fHVQRPKmApKudNlMn85d 2+H9g7givHgdRwUz+yRm8874oPyiNGUYs1btylNaiBmuFbMZv6qIqSYCocXdgGIkPB1FHvek6Lxzh AbLydym9lDNJCQiyc1sg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ofSSC-007Zbc-9p; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 20:54:20 +0000 Received: from polaris.svanheule.net ([84.16.241.116]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ofSQh-007ZHw-H4 for openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 20:52:48 +0000 Received: from terra.. (247.72-129-109.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [109.129.72.247]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sander@svanheule.net) by polaris.svanheule.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BED232A6A5; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 22:52:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=svanheule.net; s=mail1707; t=1664830356; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CVvzePGW50RXCUJAEzInpB0gVLrfGuTKc5ngntBYhhM=; b=Ax6hCVOs5L4UhHPdfuzEm89cMANcH25i4RNtrgKZ6Zs3OlZm8pLYrXaRS/EgT1D5cLBFWJ nhQLZ94xzeHiTB5DOWadxJPPiMt8H6BZjdFlQYaMofWSGtsOjSe9J9qNtouu+69I1IC+a9 F6oArvPX9ld2Noz/smBRce6fd1aKaaem7FuVSs+uYDGm7QXf1jcoqDlOHtt7+XR1ttH4dN vOctse4w90hT06L+xDrEcpDcFQq+o9S7o25vtD2hfXw1lB+sMebBWfp2rnJ9/Irh0XZMrw DIjT6i88OkQ+ZPHjIa5BMsvSdubxj7RN5/cfZNghKyG2l3kt5O8mHFxtbBLO2g== From: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Cc: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>, Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>, INAGAKI Hiroshi <musashino.open@gmail.com>, Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>, Stijn Segers <foss@volatilesystems.org>, Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net> Subject: [PATCH v2 08/16] realtek: rtl838x: add sys-led node Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 22:52:19 +0200 Message-Id: <6dca011f426c4678166ad4b452112ba15207e1c5.1664830160.git.sander@svanheule.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.3 In-Reply-To: <cover.1664830160.git.sander@svanheule.net> References: <cover.1664830160.git.sander@svanheule.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221003_135247_765758_3559D766 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.93 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: All devices that can use the system LED peripheral to control an actual LED currently use this as a GPIO-controlled LED. A GPIO LED provides more fine-grained control of blink rates, at the cost of so [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [84.16.241.116 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain X-BeenThere: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: OpenWrt Development List <openwrt-devel.lists.openwrt.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/options/openwrt-devel>, <mailto:openwrt-devel-request@lists.openwrt.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> List-Help: <mailto:openwrt-devel-request@lists.openwrt.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel>, <mailto:openwrt-devel-request@lists.openwrt.org?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "openwrt-devel" <openwrt-devel-bounces@lists.openwrt.org> Errors-To: openwrt-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.openwrt.org |
Series |
realtek: pinctrl and switch LED drivers
|
expand
|
diff --git a/target/linux/realtek/dts-5.10/rtl838x.dtsi b/target/linux/realtek/dts-5.10/rtl838x.dtsi index 631cd0e8f733..bb7348d10243 100644 --- a/target/linux/realtek/dts-5.10/rtl838x.dtsi +++ b/target/linux/realtek/dts-5.10/rtl838x.dtsi @@ -220,6 +220,11 @@ compatible = "realtek,maple-switchcore", "syscon"; reg = <0x1b000000 0x10000>; + hw_sys_led: sys-led { + compatible = "realtek,maple-sys-led"; + status = "disabled"; + }; + pinctrl { compatible = "realtek,maple-pinctrl";
All devices that can use the system LED peripheral to control an actual LED currently use this as a GPIO-controlled LED. A GPIO LED provides more fine-grained control of blink rates, at the cost of some CPU cycles. Users may anyhow prefer to use the sys-led peripheral, so add the sys-led node as "disabled" Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net> --- target/linux/realtek/dts-5.10/rtl838x.dtsi | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)