From patchwork Mon Oct 7 10:17:42 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Linus Walleij X-Patchwork-Id: 1993523 X-Patchwork-Delegate: linus.walleij@linaro.org Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=IylsuL2N; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=cUc8BTcz; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.openwrt.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=openwrt-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.openwrt.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XMZr44TTNz1xtb for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:19:00 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:Message-Id:MIME-Version:Subject: Date:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=siLmjPG+CH4zUAk93REXiKMuC1f/qhSE8foUi2G1D3A=; b=IylsuL2Nh0JemM haBQCqeDbmSYDnSJsLt/Jt6W84ecY3WpfUYvyqKhKHSIHuFIrOh3MH7X7wA4ZEJlDvmdLV+MDUdnb iIrB8LzWWZroolc4aD5JMCwvbwrOroilGvWO7lbE/F7bfm4tq6q+Uh8cE6Yzbcg1VxbXA6/yFccZD FpVWkcrRo4kCbLj5JQyd6r4JAjRNYzMNCb7wuGDzvDilfSvgsnuETSkr00bcDuVkqrzZEKA0ukp8Z D+jCFE2gOCLn9R5e3D600e46Tmi5bhZzFtElyFp0FVXaK/1FPAD6nPYdcuRu+uKhmz2cHLISaOW9n CLN5ckCRYf2O23mwcVFA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sxkoK-0000000228n-1P36; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 10:17:52 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sxkoG-0000000227s-1tXK for openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 10:17:50 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a9957588566so98181266b.3 for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 03:17:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1728296266; x=1728901066; darn=lists.openwrt.org; h=cc:to:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3rEMd8eqUmLNYUd9BE9QaF+6h8v+hMrNuj8cWMZSHTk=; b=cUc8BTczf+Y3F5esZKVDHDeZBxDe9TNKR9D5KxlIOo71HptOsJCvntU5AQUXvtfCiA QoJV8msuh3yEMdW2c67agZBUDSDCC+sTQR8LkFNnUoBvTjuxjT9QOZCZQubiswpkX0bt eOEfts1a6Sv6gUhKTS9rSV0cinaBDrJFdPcUtyMvigAC6gc+7ZZtrvCqPeBS35ktFhCJ Q8vBgx8m8iJVshc/QijGdsl8xmVBIeweuUkOWElkm5P/B0TGSsi44qo6a0cO9Ih7sn1E OJdEecFjKPP5hGxV3hEyaSt27oCeBdsv2VhRk3i/lFvH44+PDSL0JSsirnasrxrY+BiJ HV6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728296266; x=1728901066; h=cc:to:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=3rEMd8eqUmLNYUd9BE9QaF+6h8v+hMrNuj8cWMZSHTk=; b=xBHfRTzGQKRB+JWl4pDcBslMHyqoAh4AYgUgMnNzvg02adGXEagcuZqIvn1jtbsLL7 pRUzZ3JAuYC5Pd6egnVpKll53KKGizuevC1R0/yy7Z+HXgn8TyOxZR/6NQ5c54dGw7ya JVS0J6slG7cbakJX/iyaVFVTsxy/h5fn58TKAQoeLAas5MZYBy5k5Q17L5s4dUraiJJp PBHKqRdFqf5SrY8gK7RFe3rvzkvz2Yad3ZWMqSKy/l38jYedK0xRsYVJwwUGN53zGArP 5LaWgN2RvOiCUx6SKtL3AV5mSBOttDei+ytPoF6QPuHpDrNwps/3870BulzRvETwxWhb 4JrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YysuR9hsbJl3eEVJKtyU324bLI1Rzp3Uhx0g0QsOcu83NlBbz+d mQpVakMzSlU2u57W4bcY4hqQpBUtKv8GFY81/LaSeKIDnsgzZKUzqU6gh0DGC9cIstYdoF+oD9q y X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHDLCZp/dJbd5XVdsy6T9lqfABwspyl9s/uEeUuQ/mz95vlpnIUEIsy4MHUzwqZ7m5NdxTENA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:478e:b0:a86:8e3d:86e2 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a991bcfbc65mr1189588866b.11.1728296266191; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 03:17:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lino.lan ([85.235.12.238]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a9932a6992dsm350383366b.220.2024.10.07.03.17.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Oct 2024 03:17:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Walleij Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 12:17:42 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] linux: generic: dsa: mv88e6xx: Drop obsolete patch MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20241007-mv88e6xxx-drop-patch-v1-1-22d2dea20904@linaro.org> X-B4-Tracking: v=1; b=H4sIAEW1A2cC/x3MQQ5AMBBA0avIrE3SUpSriEXLYBZoWpEmjbtrL N/i/wSBPFOAoUjg6eHA15khywLm3ZwbIS/ZUIlKSSE6PB6tqY0x4uIvh87c847KClnbXreN0ZB T52nl+G/H6X0/p6MVHmYAAAA= To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org, Daniel Golle Cc: Linus Walleij X-Mailer: b4 0.14.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241007_031748_535285_B9DA5BA7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.53 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: As described by Tobias Waldekranz this patch is obsolete and the issue is already fixed in the upstream kernels we are using. Link: http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2024-October/043238.html Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- ...xxx-Request-assisted-learning-on-CPU-port.patch | 27 ---- [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:632 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-BeenThere: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: OpenWrt Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "openwrt-devel" Errors-To: openwrt-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.openwrt.org As described by Tobias Waldekranz this patch is obsolete and the issue is already fixed in the upstream kernels we are using. Link: http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2024-October/043238.html Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- ...xxx-Request-assisted-learning-on-CPU-port.patch | 27 ---------------------- 1 file changed, 27 deletions(-) --- base-commit: b7f4d2d25aa0e7e0600437aad2624c124ad85e6c change-id: 20241007-mv88e6xxx-drop-patch-4b013b9865a8 Best regards, diff --git a/target/linux/generic/pending-6.6/768-net-dsa-mv88e6xxx-Request-assisted-learning-on-CPU-port.patch b/target/linux/generic/pending-6.6/768-net-dsa-mv88e6xxx-Request-assisted-learning-on-CPU-port.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 92f87f619873..000000000000 --- a/target/linux/generic/pending-6.6/768-net-dsa-mv88e6xxx-Request-assisted-learning-on-CPU-port.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,27 +0,0 @@ -From: Tobias Waldekranz -Subject: [RFC net-next 7/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Request assisted learning on CPU port -Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 02:25:15 +0100 -Archived-At: - -While the hardware is capable of performing learning on the CPU port, -it requires alot of additions to the bridge's forwarding path in order -to handle multi-destination traffic correctly. - -Until that is in place, opt for the next best thing and let DSA sync -the relevant addresses down to the hardware FDB. - -Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz ---- - drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 1 + - 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) - ---- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c -+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c -@@ -7027,6 +7027,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_register_switch(str - ds->ops = &mv88e6xxx_switch_ops; - ds->ageing_time_min = chip->info->age_time_coeff; - ds->ageing_time_max = chip->info->age_time_coeff * U8_MAX; -+ ds->assisted_learning_on_cpu_port = true; - - /* Some chips support up to 32, but that requires enabling the - * 5-bit port mode, which we do not support. 640k^W16 ought to