| Message ID | 20200716143444.77470-1-peter.stadler@student.uibk.ac.at |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | opkg: prioritize the latest provider (not the first) | expand |
diff --git a/libopkg/pkg_hash.c b/libopkg/pkg_hash.c index 52c64ff..f564b6f 100644 --- a/libopkg/pkg_hash.c +++ b/libopkg/pkg_hash.c @@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ pkg_t *pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate(abstract_pkg_t * apkg, for (i = 0; i < matching_pkgs->len; i++) { pkg_t *matching = matching_pkgs->pkgs[i]; arch_priority = pkg_get_arch_priority(matching); - if (arch_priority > prio) { + if (arch_priority >= prio) { priorized_matching = matching; prio = arch_priority; opkg_msg(DEBUG, "Match %s with priority %i.\n",
Hi, this is now the right patch that does: Set `priorized_matching` to the latest provider with maximum priority, such that it is similar to the other selections (especially `good_pkg_by_name`). So, we have consistency between using `opkg install apkg` and installing a package that `DEPENDS:=+apkg` (if there are two providers for `apkg`). All the best, Peter Signed-off-by: Peter Stadler <peter.stadler@student.uibk.ac.at> --- libopkg/pkg_hash.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)