| Message ID | 1435548658-1734-1-git-send-email-ldpinney@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | Rafał Miłecki |
| Headers | show |
On 29 June 2015 at 05:30, L. D. Pinney <ldpinney@gmail.com> wrote: > It's an 8 MiB flash with 4 KiB erase sectors. > > Unfortunately this patch from Rafał Miłecki <zajec5 at gmail.com> hasn't been picked up. I don't pick/backport every (mtd) patch, so: 1) Please drop your complainings from the commit message 2) Backport this patch to 4.0 and 4.1 as well 3) Rename it, see target/linux/generic/PATCHES 4) Resend
On 29 June 2015 at 06:36, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 June 2015 at 05:30, L. D. Pinney <ldpinney@gmail.com> wrote: >> It's an 8 MiB flash with 4 KiB erase sectors. >> >> Unfortunately this patch from Rafał Miłecki <zajec5 at gmail.com> hasn't been picked up. > > I don't pick/backport every (mtd) patch, so: > 1) Please drop your complainings from the commit message > 2) Backport this patch to 4.0 and 4.1 as well > 3) Rename it, see target/linux/generic/PATCHES > 4) Resend 5) Sign it off
On 29/06/2015 06:37, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 29 June 2015 at 06:36, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 29 June 2015 at 05:30, L. D. Pinney <ldpinney@gmail.com> wrote: >>> It's an 8 MiB flash with 4 KiB erase sectors. >>> >>> Unfortunately this patch from Rafał Miłecki <zajec5 at gmail.com> hasn't been picked up. >> >> I don't pick/backport every (mtd) patch, so: >> 1) Please drop your complainings from the commit message >> 2) Backport this patch to 4.0 and 4.1 as well >> 3) Rename it, see target/linux/generic/PATCHES >> 4) Resend > > 5) Sign it off > 6) send it upstream to minux-mtd
On 29 June 2015 at 07:00, John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> wrote: > On 29/06/2015 06:37, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> On 29 June 2015 at 06:36, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 29 June 2015 at 05:30, L. D. Pinney <ldpinney@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> It's an 8 MiB flash with 4 KiB erase sectors. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately this patch from Rafał Miłecki <zajec5 at gmail.com> hasn't been picked up. >>> >>> I don't pick/backport every (mtd) patch, so: >>> 1) Please drop your complainings from the commit message >>> 2) Backport this patch to 4.0 and 4.1 as well >>> 3) Rename it, see target/linux/generic/PATCHES >>> 4) Resend >> >> 5) Sign it off >> > > 6) send it upstream to minux-mtd It's a backport. It was already sent by me :) Queued for 4.2.
OK Thanks.... I'll try to fix it ... I need it for the Bitmain Antminer S3 :) Larry On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 June 2015 at 07:00, John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> wrote: > > On 29/06/2015 06:37, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> On 29 June 2015 at 06:36, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On 29 June 2015 at 05:30, L. D. Pinney <ldpinney@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> It's an 8 MiB flash with 4 KiB erase sectors. > >>>> > >>>> Unfortunately this patch from Rafał Miłecki <zajec5 at gmail.com> > hasn't been picked up. > >>> > >>> I don't pick/backport every (mtd) patch, so: > >>> 1) Please drop your complainings from the commit message > >>> 2) Backport this patch to 4.0 and 4.1 as well > >>> 3) Rename it, see target/linux/generic/PATCHES > >>> 4) Resend > >> > >> 5) Sign it off > >> > > > > 6) send it upstream to minux-mtd > > It's a backport. It was already sent by me :) Queued for 4.2. > > -- > Rafał > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >
diff --git a/target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/475-mtd-spi-nor-add-support-for-the-Spansion_S25FL164K b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/475-mtd-spi-nor-add-support-for-the-Spansion_S25FL164K new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6b185b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/generic/patches-3.18/475-mtd-spi-nor-add-support-for-the-Spansion_S25FL164K @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c ++++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c +@@ -573,6 +573,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id spi_nor_ids[] = { + { "s25fl008k", INFO(0xef4014, 0, 64 * 1024, 16, SECT_4K) }, + { "s25fl016k", INFO(0xef4015, 0, 64 * 1024, 32, SECT_4K) }, + { "s25fl064k", INFO(0xef4017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) }, ++ { "s25fl164k", INFO(0x014017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) }, + + /* SST -- large erase sizes are "overlays", "sectors" are 4K */ + { "sst25vf040b", INFO(0xbf258d, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K | SST_WRITE) },
It's an 8 MiB flash with 4 KiB erase sectors. Unfortunately this patch from Rafał Miłecki <zajec5 at gmail.com> hasn't been picked up. Tested-by: L. D. Pinney <ldpinney@gmail.com> --- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)