Message ID | 20230615143212.2464680-1-ynezz@true.cz |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <openwrt-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.openwrt.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.openwrt.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=openwrt-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.openwrt.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=jR0iT/p3; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" header.d=true.cz header.i=@true.cz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=xnet header.b=P0Py4SVn; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QhlDG48Csz20X4 for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 00:34:22 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc :To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=qyRcYyXeoykICmoP1PC/wM9EHW9aV6DwXIh9mhbJ004=; b=jR0iT/p3460K04 P/yGlbdlctA0t1Xh2eG2xzVJ8oTqNvIgoKcyPsEZkHg4zPnyHz4sU48f7GRqXc9JzI1j+HJ3sQxk4 aSYaaz5w707Sp8asX8f0+tccGvMerxa409pTq1Vkd+rQp9l6oh20eEdzAsfaegq1/z/+5mi07XSy1 /Z3JFH0PWRycL59Cc1Y8DX4g0C72b3rLs1Cj9uU5VSIBjWLoanFEBG3bmvMb0ihnKUirJyQ6Rd350 2EiHhWdfaHXBphRNTKHKu1Wrbro2v2qWbpGtz3rcBXvEZ/Pdf2veNbeby5dD3yNOk7Vf6320u4hJO LWBQJTHlSKXfNMflvQ1g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q9o1b-00F8pR-0I; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 14:32:35 +0000 Received: from smtp-out.xnet.cz ([178.217.244.18]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q9o1V-00F8nX-1E for openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 14:32:32 +0000 Received: from meh.true.cz (meh.true.cz [108.61.167.218]) (Authenticated sender: petr@true.cz) by smtp-out.xnet.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78B4D18453; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:32:25 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=true.cz; s=xnet; t=1686839545; bh=FhZdwB+Ls4sa+o+OGyLrpukrw72GiFNsA5NYL0fqH8E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=P0Py4SVn67KISF5kRmzfbmAAsvt+bkJbcmdomIYLObwXYgpqdtYap5ogthXlIgz5g FGMAT46aBFsqV9fOGFgsN8XpTP+0HzRxzwIGzGMKkzN+19L84K1HWfSuUn1++P9NWA WvptMK4qFp/5depduNXbHkVTEBRl6xQx7v6953ZA= Received: by meh.true.cz (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6ec84fa7; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:31:38 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?q?Petr_=C5=A0tetiar?= <ynezz@true.cz> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Cc: =?utf-8?q?Petr_=C5=A0tetiar?= <ynezz@true.cz> Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Fix missing TLS v1.3 support with OpenSSL Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:32:07 +0200 Message-Id: <20230615143212.2464680-1-ynezz@true.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230615_073229_606299_013CA729 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.60 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, current default official images on all devices are using mbedTLS 2.y which doesn't support TLS v1.3 (#12874), so lets fix it by using OpenSSL on devices which should have enough storage space to accom [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.1 DKIM_INVALID DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid X-BeenThere: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: OpenWrt Development List <openwrt-devel.lists.openwrt.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/options/openwrt-devel>, <mailto:openwrt-devel-request@lists.openwrt.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> List-Help: <mailto:openwrt-devel-request@lists.openwrt.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel>, <mailto:openwrt-devel-request@lists.openwrt.org?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Sender: "openwrt-devel" <openwrt-devel-bounces@lists.openwrt.org> Errors-To: openwrt-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.openwrt.org |
Series | Fix missing TLS v1.3 support with OpenSSL | expand |