Message ID | 20160108121130.GL27290@indiana.gru.redhat.com |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@openvswitch.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from archives.nicira.com (li376-54.members.linode.com [96.126.127.54]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F471401DA for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:11:42 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from archives.nicira.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by archives.nicira.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2361610B55; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 04:11:42 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: dev@openvswitch.org Delivered-To: dev@openvswitch.org Received: from mx1e3.cudamail.com (mx1.cudamail.com [69.90.118.67]) by archives.nicira.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E070A10B53 for <dev@openvswitch.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 04:11:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from bar2.cudamail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1e3.cudamail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 536B64201FC for <dev@openvswitch.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:11:40 -0700 (MST) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1452255099-03dc5366eb15350001-byXFYA Received: from mx1-pf2.cudamail.com ([192.168.24.2]) by bar2.cudamail.com with ESMTP id jatCXkID4nK4ibxY (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dev@openvswitch.org>; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:11:39 -0700 (MST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: cascardo@redhat.com X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 192.168.24.2 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by mx1-pf2.cudamail.com with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 8 Jan 2016 12:11:38 -0000 Received-SPF: pass (mx1-pf2.cudamail.com: SPF record at _spf1.redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 209.132.183.28 X-Barracuda-RBL-IP: 209.132.183.28 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55A2DFB75B; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from indiana.gru.redhat.com (ovpn-113-48.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.48]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u08CBVA2017745 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:11:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:11:31 -0200 X-CudaMail-Envelope-Sender: cascardo@redhat.com From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@redhat.com> To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> X-CudaMail-MID: CM-E2-107008195 X-CudaMail-DTE: 010816 X-CudaMail-Originating-IP: 209.132.183.28 Message-ID: <20160108121130.GL27290@indiana.gru.redhat.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [##CM-E2-107008195##]Re: [PATCH] net: preserve IP control block during GSO segmentation References: <145225444176.22215.2003378381077166898.stgit@zurg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <145225444176.22215.2003378381077166898.stgit@zurg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26 X-GBUdb-Analysis: 0, 209.132.183.28, Ugly c=0.303425 p=-0.157895 Source Normal X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-10486-c X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[192.168.24.2] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1452255099 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-URL: https://web.cudamail.com:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at cudamail.com X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 2.60 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=2.60 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=4.0 tests=BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO, BSF_SC7_SA_HREF_FROM_MISMATCH_TEXT_URIx1_HL, RDNS_NONE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.25949 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO Envelope rcpt doesn't match header 0.10 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS 2.50 BSF_SC7_SA_HREF_FROM_MISMATCH_TEXT_URIx1_HL Custom Rule HREF_FROM_MISMATCH_TEXT_URIx1_HL Cc: dev@openvswitch.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] net: preserve IP control block during GSO segmentation X-BeenThere: dev@openvswitch.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: <dev.openvswitch.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://openvswitch.org/mailman/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@openvswitch.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev> List-Post: <mailto:dev@openvswitch.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@openvswitch.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@openvswitch.org?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: dev-bounces@openvswitch.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@openvswitch.org> |
--- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c +++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c @@ -359,7 +359,6 @@ static int queue_gso_packets(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb, /* Queue all of the segments. */ skb = segs; do { - *OVS_CB(skb) = ovs_cb; if (gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP && skb != segs) key = &later_key;