From patchwork Tue Jan 31 09:20:08 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xiang W X-Patchwork-Id: 1734693 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=opensbi-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=2+OyQl0H; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=126.com header.i=@126.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=s110527 header.b=kcG+8sco; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4P5ffr2QNJz23gV for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 20:20:52 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=oQUR5kAEWr3u7ODY+oX3qkZ5uWRtEHxYxDNtzU20AL4=; b=2+OyQl0HjA66eB cT/Nk5Lm3uGtxH47kserep+5pfFpbbhK+mIGHQTkqpmTdnVW43BlOn9ZCXQeJ4/kgk9AfJRsAkKBc wumKHIjgP95/Z0x+Hbdiow4DUK7/bNbe1u6yW8mjbph+U6VIcmb4R3UgSB2K+htp8c/HvZZdHMSwo G6HqtaddeXeHQtGPtoSyV6yG2rHOPnvclQAR2UfBFOVNK6jCOUPt11Ar8gHU+qyH2Ggb1lS+Emn2C qPDaajXecxoyao6nuN0jKA3PItb0SPE3PJULA/YrdVBjB2FwlXQvqWkLgO2doLZRHuHcZB/mV+SnD b+GXw4XkPMRd0VY9x3Vw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pMmof-006xKT-LT; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:20:37 +0000 Received: from m126.mail.126.com ([220.181.12.29]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pMmoc-006xIk-DG for opensbi@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:20:36 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=126.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=ZDpXp RqccTpo7JPRo+U0V4KWNJpB2gfZRhVRyFNnA/A=; b=kcG+8scocIido7Hr6oFP/ JMEAUNKNH6nj3zGp++ZH28JHKYaFCfj+LiEtHbczHr4piY8J3o0rIbTjPVuHbmVk vFj5oJCeSDo6jMnevhXoCbmEkdOf2uBS0uuLFMR6gxnw9M0y1fRe0QnZOfZvF4sf LbQcIHsQwamMFIuDzMnXZ4= Received: from x390.lan (unknown [210.22.74.155]) by zwqz-smtp-mta-g0-1 (Coremail) with SMTP id _____wDHP85V3dhjDFYFAg--.29655S5; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:20:26 +0800 (CST) From: Xiang W To: opensbi@lists.infradead.org Cc: Xiang W Subject: [PATCH 3/3] lib: sbi: rename function of sbi_ipi Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:20:08 +0800 Message-Id: <20230131092008.51078-4-wxjstz@126.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0 In-Reply-To: <20230131092008.51078-1-wxjstz@126.com> References: <20230131092008.51078-1-wxjstz@126.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: _____wDHP85V3dhjDFYFAg--.29655S5 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoW7tr43Jw17JFyUCF1xAr15twb_yoW8trW3pF 9xAFnFkw4xtryUK39rAw40gr93tr4vqFZ7urW7ta4FqF4DArn8tF93Jw1jyr95Jr93Kw1a vwsFvrW8CF12qrUanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0zR4q2_UUUUU= X-Originating-IP: [210.22.74.155] X-CM-SenderInfo: pz0m23b26rjloofrz/1tbiJh4IOlpD8AYpggABsP X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230131_012034_815965_BA41DB80 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.66 ) X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Renamed some functions and reused some code Signed-off-by: Xiang W --- lib/sbi/sbi_tlb.c | 27 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_tlb.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_tlb.c index 685b8ea..c82f53a 100644 --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_tlb.c +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_tlb.c @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void tlb_pmu_incr_fw_ctr(struct sbi_tlb_info [...] Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider [wxjstz[at]126.com] -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain X-BeenThere: opensbi@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "opensbi" Errors-To: opensbi-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org Renamed some functions and reused some code Signed-off-by: Xiang W --- lib/sbi/sbi_tlb.c | 27 ++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_tlb.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_tlb.c index 685b8ea..c82f53a 100644 --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_tlb.c +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_tlb.c @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void tlb_pmu_incr_fw_ctr(struct sbi_tlb_info *data) sbi_pmu_ctr_incr_fw(SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID_SENT); } -static void tlb_entry_process(struct sbi_tlb_info *tinfo) +static void tlb_process_helper(struct sbi_tlb_info *tinfo) { u32 rhartid; struct sbi_scratch *rscratch = NULL; @@ -229,30 +229,23 @@ static void tlb_entry_process(struct sbi_tlb_info *tinfo) } } -static void tlb_process_count(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, int count) +static int tlb_process_once(struct sbi_scratch *scratch) { struct sbi_tlb_info tinfo; - unsigned int deq_count = 0; struct sbi_fifo *tlb_fifo = sbi_scratch_offset_ptr(scratch, tlb_fifo_off); - while (!sbi_fifo_dequeue(tlb_fifo, &tinfo)) { - tlb_entry_process(&tinfo); - deq_count++; - if (deq_count > count) - break; - + if (!sbi_fifo_dequeue(tlb_fifo, &tinfo)) { + tlb_process_helper(&tinfo); + return 0; } + + return -1; } static void tlb_process(struct sbi_scratch *scratch) { - struct sbi_tlb_info tinfo; - struct sbi_fifo *tlb_fifo = - sbi_scratch_offset_ptr(scratch, tlb_fifo_off); - - while (!sbi_fifo_dequeue(tlb_fifo, &tinfo)) - tlb_entry_process(&tinfo); + while (!tlb_process_once(scratch)); } static void tlb_sync(struct sbi_scratch *scratch) @@ -265,7 +258,7 @@ static void tlb_sync(struct sbi_scratch *scratch) * While we are waiting for remote hart to set the sync, * consume fifo requests to avoid deadlock. */ - tlb_process_count(scratch, 1); + tlb_process_once(scratch); } return; @@ -383,7 +376,7 @@ static int tlb_update(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, * TODO: Introduce a wait/wakeup event mechanism to handle * this properly. */ - tlb_process_count(scratch, 1); + tlb_process_once(scratch); sbi_dprintf("hart%d: hart%d tlb fifo full\n", curr_hartid, remote_hartid); }