@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ struct bsc_api {
* not implemented AMR5.9 will be used.
*/
void (*mr_config)(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn,
- uint8_t *mr_ms_lv, uint8_t *mr_bts_lv);
+ struct gsm_lchan *lchan, int full_rate);
};
int bsc_api_init(struct gsm_network *network, struct bsc_api *api);
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static void handle_mr_config(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn,
struct gsm48_multi_rate_conf *mr_conf;
if (api->mr_config)
- return api->mr_config(conn, lchan->mr_ms_lv, lchan->mr_bts_lv);
+ return api->mr_config(conn, lchan, full_rate);
if (full_rate)
mr = &lchan->ts->trx->bts->mr_full;
@@ -491,9 +491,10 @@ static void bsc_cm_update(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn,
}
static void bsc_mr_config(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn,
- struct gsm48_multi_rate_conf *conf)
+ struct gsm_lchan *lchan, int full_rate)
{
struct osmo_msc_data *msc;
+ struct gsm48_multi_rate_conf *ms_conf, *bts_conf;
if (!conn->sccp_con) {
LOGP(DMSC, LOGL_ERROR,
@@ -504,18 +505,31 @@ static void bsc_mr_config(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn,
msc = conn->sccp_con->msc;
- conf->ver = 1;
- conf->icmi = 1;
+ /* initialize the data structure */
+ lchan->mr_ms_lv[0] = sizeof(*ms_conf);
+ lchan->mr_bts_lv[0] = sizeof(*bts_conf);
+ ms_conf = (struct gsm48_multi_rate_conf *) &lchan->mr_ms_lv[1];
+ bts_conf = (struct gsm48_multi_rate_conf *) &lchan->mr_bts_lv[1];
+ memset(ms_conf, 0, sizeof(*ms_conf));
+ memset(bts_conf, 0, sizeof(*bts_conf));
+
+ bts_conf->ver = ms_conf->ver = 1;
+ bts_conf->icmi = ms_conf->icmi = 1;
/* maybe gcc see's it is copy of _one_ byte */
- conf->m4_75 = msc->amr_conf.m4_75;
- conf->m5_15 = msc->amr_conf.m5_15;
- conf->m5_90 = msc->amr_conf.m5_90;
- conf->m6_70 = msc->amr_conf.m6_70;
- conf->m7_40 = msc->amr_conf.m7_40;
- conf->m7_95 = msc->amr_conf.m7_95;
- conf->m10_2 = msc->amr_conf.m10_2;
- conf->m12_2 = msc->amr_conf.m12_2;
+ bts_conf->m4_75 = ms_conf->m4_75 = msc->amr_conf.m4_75;
+ bts_conf->m5_15 = ms_conf->m5_15 = msc->amr_conf.m5_15;
+ bts_conf->m5_90 = ms_conf->m5_90 = msc->amr_conf.m5_90;
+ bts_conf->m6_70 = ms_conf->m6_70 = msc->amr_conf.m6_70;
+ bts_conf->m7_40 = ms_conf->m7_40 = msc->amr_conf.m7_40;
+ bts_conf->m7_95 = ms_conf->m7_95 = msc->amr_conf.m7_95;
+ if (full_rate) {
+ bts_conf->m10_2 = ms_conf->m10_2 = msc->amr_conf.m10_2;
+ bts_conf->m12_2 = ms_conf->m12_2 = msc->amr_conf.m12_2;
+ }
+
+ /* now copy this into the bts structure */
+ memcpy(lchan->mr_bts_lv, lchan->mr_ms_lv, sizeof(lchan->mr_ms_lv));
}
static struct bsc_api bsc_handler = {
From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther <holger@moiji-mobile.com> The signature of mr_config and the BSC implementation didn't match and the compiler was warning about it: osmo_bsc_api.c:530:2: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type .mr_config = bsc_mr_config, ^ osmo_bsc_api.c:530:2: warning: (near initialization for ‘bsc_handler.mr_config’) Change the mr_config again and provide an implementation that will set the ms and bts data structure. It would be better to put the size outside of the IE but I am not going to change it right now. It would also be nice to either move the AMR setting into the "nitb" structure or have the msc data be used _after_ the bts settings. This needs to be cleaned up in the next step. Manually verified by placing a MO call and checking that both the channel mode modify and the mode modify request contain the multi rate config with the rate mr config (length two bytes, version 1, icmi==1, no start mode being set). --- openbsc/include/openbsc/bsc_api.h | 2 +- openbsc/src/libbsc/bsc_api.c | 2 +- openbsc/src/osmo-bsc/osmo_bsc_api.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)