| Message ID | 20240904104824.1844082-6-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com |
|---|---|
| State | RFC |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Support socket access-control | expand |
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 06:48:10PM +0800, Mikhail Ivanov wrote: > Add test that validates behaviour of Landlock after rule with > unknown access is added. > > Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> > --- > Changes since v2: > * Replaces EXPECT_EQ with ASSERT_EQ for close(). > * Refactors commit title. > > Changes since v1: > * Refactors commit messsage. > --- > .../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c > index cb23efd3ccc9..811bdaa95a7a 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c > @@ -325,4 +325,30 @@ TEST_F(protocol, socket_access_rights) > ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); > } > > +TEST_F(protocol, rule_with_unknown_access) > +{ > + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { > + .handled_access_socket = ACCESS_ALL, > + }; > + struct landlock_socket_attr protocol = { > + .family = self->prot.family, > + .type = self->prot.type, > + }; > + int ruleset_fd; > + __u64 access; > + > + ruleset_fd = > + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); > + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); > + > + for (access = 1ULL << 63; access != ACCESS_LAST; access >>= 1) { > + protocol.allowed_access = access; > + EXPECT_EQ(-1, > + landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET, > + &protocol, 0)); > + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno); > + } > + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); > +} > + > TEST_HARNESS_MAIN > -- > 2.34.1 > Reviewed-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c index cb23efd3ccc9..811bdaa95a7a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c @@ -325,4 +325,30 @@ TEST_F(protocol, socket_access_rights) ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); } +TEST_F(protocol, rule_with_unknown_access) +{ + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { + .handled_access_socket = ACCESS_ALL, + }; + struct landlock_socket_attr protocol = { + .family = self->prot.family, + .type = self->prot.type, + }; + int ruleset_fd; + __u64 access; + + ruleset_fd = + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); + + for (access = 1ULL << 63; access != ACCESS_LAST; access >>= 1) { + protocol.allowed_access = access; + EXPECT_EQ(-1, + landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET, + &protocol, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno); + } + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); +} + TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
Add test that validates behaviour of Landlock after rule with unknown access is added. Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> --- Changes since v2: * Replaces EXPECT_EQ with ASSERT_EQ for close(). * Refactors commit title. Changes since v1: * Refactors commit messsage. --- .../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)