From patchwork Fri Nov 19 16:39:26 2010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alex Deucher X-Patchwork-Id: 72269 X-Patchwork-Delegate: davem@davemloft.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681041007D2 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 03:39:52 +1100 (EST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755856Ab0KSQjc (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:39:32 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:45795 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755329Ab0KSQj3 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:39:29 -0500 Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13so830065fxm.19 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:39:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YgG3k8d/St5bfoYPHK4Y0ySpAPzpGY4j8fUMT/6Md24=; b=iatTfaNwDci1AmO23hmcdSlEXBMJmzw4gnCR+qYi81Ot3vdL4SbDvHPHq4zScfFHbl N7goBKaGKwy9RHs5pWlriF3O6M9jjxqMO6Ll6GcsLYmdOPQC/CaC1HciJDi1s2oKaAJU 7UkGNvYLXTwsqabmy0cNLlwbG9v+aZMJP3yjg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tHZ4rhng/Gp4n9Fo2KNDzwq1X6Qb62zK0UPxSOP6syx7SJCi9gtVnGzoz1azZsdoiN 6I/9HdbdAmh7U/YZIaj12BmvNsFHeHEFR9S5Oc0DwBGK67UddyTlNWQl2GInhMaAImT+ csou9TmhCpayYCm421kzccYN9vaTTmL/WigzE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.79.65 with SMTP id o1mr1095262fak.145.1290184767054; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:39:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.112.81 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:39:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CE5C919.7090504@teksavvy.com> References: <4CE5C919.7090504@teksavvy.com> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:39:26 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 2.6.37-rc2-git4: Reported regressions 2.6.35 -> 2.6.36 From: Alex Deucher To: Mark Lord Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux SCSI List , Linux ACPI , Network Development , Linux Wireless List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DRI , Florian Mickler , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Linus Torvalds , Linux PM List , Maciej Rutecki Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Lord wrote: > On 10-11-18 06:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced >> before >> 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking >> team. >> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. >> >> If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.35 regressions, please let us >> know >> either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know if any >> of the entries below are invalid. > >> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21652 >> Subject         : several problems with intel graphics since 2.6.36 >> Submitter       : Norbert Preining >> Date            : 2010-10-27 14:32 (23 days old) >> Message-ID      :<20101027143252.GA8676@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> >> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128818998630241&w=2 > > That one is interesting to me.. I suspect it may be the same cause > as for https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21952 > > I have one of those Samsung (N210) Netbooks here: works fine with 2.6.34 and > earlier, > but fails to come out of suspend on 2.6.35/2.6.36 (haven't tried 2.6.37). > > So perhaps add 21952 to the list, or link it to the 21652 > (kind of amusing how similar the bug numbers are..). > > > My non-Intel graphics notebook (has ATI X1400 graphics) also has a resume > regression with 2.6.36.  But it does work fine with 2.6.35 (and earlier, > back many years).  As a result, I'm stuck with 2.6.35 for the time being, > and lack the time for a concerted debug effort on 2.6.36+ right now. > Can you bisect? Does this patch help? break; Alex > Cheers > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel > --- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c index 8e421f6..05efb5b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base, base += 3; break; case ATOM_IIO_WRITE: + (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1)); ctx->card->ioreg_write(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1), temp); base += 3;