@@ -686,12 +686,12 @@ static struct vcap_field vsc9959_vcap_is2_actions[] = {
[VCAP_IS2_ACT_POLICE_ENA] = { 9, 1},
[VCAP_IS2_ACT_POLICE_IDX] = { 10, 9},
[VCAP_IS2_ACT_POLICE_VCAP_ONLY] = { 19, 1},
- [VCAP_IS2_ACT_PORT_MASK] = { 20, 11},
- [VCAP_IS2_ACT_REW_OP] = { 31, 9},
- [VCAP_IS2_ACT_SMAC_REPLACE_ENA] = { 40, 1},
- [VCAP_IS2_ACT_RSV] = { 41, 2},
- [VCAP_IS2_ACT_ACL_ID] = { 43, 6},
- [VCAP_IS2_ACT_HIT_CNT] = { 49, 32},
+ [VCAP_IS2_ACT_PORT_MASK] = { 20, 6},
+ [VCAP_IS2_ACT_REW_OP] = { 26, 9},
+ [VCAP_IS2_ACT_SMAC_REPLACE_ENA] = { 35, 1},
+ [VCAP_IS2_ACT_RSV] = { 36, 2},
+ [VCAP_IS2_ACT_ACL_ID] = { 38, 6},
+ [VCAP_IS2_ACT_HIT_CNT] = { 44, 32},
};
static const struct vcap_props vsc9959_vcap_props[] = {
The port mask width was larger than the actual number of ports, and therefore, all fields following this one were also shifted by the number of excess bits. But the driver doesn't use the REW_OP, SMAC_REPLACE_ENA or ACL_ID bits from the action vector, so the bug was inconsequential. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> --- drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)