From patchwork Mon Aug 10 12:16:58 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Miaohe Lin X-Patchwork-Id: 1342818 X-Patchwork-Delegate: davem@davemloft.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=23.128.96.18; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BQFNp2VbNz9sTT for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 22:18:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726809AbgHJMSR (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:18:17 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:9256 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726146AbgHJMSP (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:18:15 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 4D9A955539E3F4B410D8; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:18:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.104.175) by DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:18:02 +0800 From: Miaohe Lin To: , , , , , , , CC: , , Subject: [PATCH] net: Fix potential memory leak in proto_register() Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:16:58 -0400 Message-ID: <20200810121658.54657-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.104.175] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org If we failed to assign proto idx, we free the twsk_slab_name but forget to free the twsk_slab. Add a helper function tw_prot_cleanup() to free these together and also use this helper function in proto_unregister(). Fixes: b45ce32135d1 ("sock: fix potential memory leak in proto_register()") Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin --- net/core/sock.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index 49cd5ffe673e..c9083ad44ea1 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -3406,6 +3406,16 @@ static void sock_inuse_add(struct net *net, int val) } #endif +static void tw_prot_cleanup(struct timewait_sock_ops *twsk_prot) +{ + if (!twsk_prot) + return; + kfree(twsk_prot->twsk_slab_name); + twsk_prot->twsk_slab_name = NULL; + kmem_cache_destroy(twsk_prot->twsk_slab); + twsk_prot->twsk_slab = NULL; +} + static void req_prot_cleanup(struct request_sock_ops *rsk_prot) { if (!rsk_prot) @@ -3476,7 +3486,7 @@ int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab) prot->slab_flags, NULL); if (prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab == NULL) - goto out_free_timewait_sock_slab_name; + goto out_free_timewait_sock_slab; } } @@ -3484,15 +3494,15 @@ int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab) ret = assign_proto_idx(prot); if (ret) { mutex_unlock(&proto_list_mutex); - goto out_free_timewait_sock_slab_name; + goto out_free_timewait_sock_slab; } list_add(&prot->node, &proto_list); mutex_unlock(&proto_list_mutex); return ret; -out_free_timewait_sock_slab_name: +out_free_timewait_sock_slab: if (alloc_slab && prot->twsk_prot) - kfree(prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab_name); + tw_prot_cleanup(prot->twsk_prot); out_free_request_sock_slab: if (alloc_slab) { req_prot_cleanup(prot->rsk_prot); @@ -3516,12 +3526,7 @@ void proto_unregister(struct proto *prot) prot->slab = NULL; req_prot_cleanup(prot->rsk_prot); - - if (prot->twsk_prot != NULL && prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab != NULL) { - kmem_cache_destroy(prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab); - kfree(prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab_name); - prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab = NULL; - } + tw_prot_cleanup(prot->twsk_prot); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(proto_unregister);