Message ID | 20200725142404.30634-1-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
From: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 19:53:58 +0530 > This patch series provides ACPI support for dpaa2 MAC driver. > This also introduces ACPI mechanism to get PHYs registered on a > MDIO bus and provide them to be connected to MAC. > > Previous discussions on this patchset is available at: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20200715090400.4733-1-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com/T/#t > > Patch "net: dpaa2-mac: Add ACPI support for DPAA2 MAC driver" depends on > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/linux.git/commit/?h=acpi/for-next&id=c279c4cf5bcd3c55b4fb9709d9036cd1bfe3beb8 > Remaining patches are independent of the above patch and can be applied without > any issues. This really needs to be reviewed by phy/phylink people. > Device Tree can be tested on LX2160A-RDB with the below change which is also > available in the above referenced patches: > > --- a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c > +++ b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c > @@ -931,6 +931,7 @@ static int fsl_mc_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (error < 0) > goto error_cleanup_mc_io; > > + mc_bus_dev->dev.fwnode = pdev->dev.fwnode; > mc->root_mc_bus_dev = mc_bus_dev; > return 0; I don't know how you expect me to handle this dependency in the networking tree.
On 7/28/2020 5:39 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com> > Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 19:53:58 +0530 > >> This patch series provides ACPI support for dpaa2 MAC driver. >> This also introduces ACPI mechanism to get PHYs registered on a >> MDIO bus and provide them to be connected to MAC. >> >> Previous discussions on this patchset is available at: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20200715090400.4733-1-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com/T/#t >> >> Patch "net: dpaa2-mac: Add ACPI support for DPAA2 MAC driver" depends on >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/linux.git/commit/?h=acpi/for-next&id=c279c4cf5bcd3c55b4fb9709d9036cd1bfe3beb8 >> Remaining patches are independent of the above patch and can be applied without >> any issues. > > This really needs to be reviewed by phy/phylink people. Oh it has been reviewed! We just have stalled for various reasons. There is another email thread with the same subject which is still being discussed: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20200715090400.4733-1-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com/T/#t
--- a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c +++ b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c @@ -931,6 +931,7 @@ static int fsl_mc_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (error < 0) goto error_cleanup_mc_io; + mc_bus_dev->dev.fwnode = pdev->dev.fwnode; mc->root_mc_bus_dev = mc_bus_dev; return 0;