@@ -678,6 +678,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_task_stack_proto = {
BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
void *, buf, u32, size, u64, flags)
{
+ struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *)(ctx->regs);
struct perf_event *event = ctx->event;
struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
bool kernel, user;
@@ -685,7 +686,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
__u64 nr_kernel;
if (!(event->attr.sample_type & __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY))
- return __bpf_get_stack(ctx->regs, NULL, NULL, buf, size, flags);
+ return __bpf_get_stack(regs, NULL, NULL, buf, size, flags);
if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID)))
@@ -705,8 +706,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
__u64 nr = trace->nr;
trace->nr = nr_kernel;
- err = __bpf_get_stack(ctx->regs, NULL, trace, buf,
- size, flags);
+ err = __bpf_get_stack(regs, NULL, trace, buf, size, flags);
/* restore nr */
trace->nr = nr;
@@ -718,8 +718,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
goto clear;
flags = (flags & ~BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK) | skip;
- err = __bpf_get_stack(ctx->regs, NULL, trace, buf,
- size, flags);
+ err = __bpf_get_stack(regs, NULL, trace, buf, size, flags);
}
return err;
Architectures like s390, powerpc, arm64, riscv have speical definition of bpf_user_pt_regs_t. So we need to cast the pointer before passing it to bpf_get_stack(). This is similar to bpf_get_stack_tp(). Fixes: 03d42fd2d83f ("bpf: Separate bpf_get_[stack|stackid] for perf events BPF") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> --- kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)