diff mbox series

[net] mptcp: Initialize map_seq upon subflow establishment

Message ID 20200511162442.78382-1-cpaasch@apple.com
State Accepted
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show
Series [net] mptcp: Initialize map_seq upon subflow establishment | expand

Commit Message

Christoph Paasch May 11, 2020, 4:24 p.m. UTC
When the other MPTCP-peer uses 32-bit data-sequence numbers, we rely on
map_seq to indicate how to expand to a 64-bit data-sequence number in
expand_seq() when receiving data.

For new subflows, this field is not initialized, thus results in an
"invalid" mapping being discarded.

Fix this by initializing map_seq upon subflow establishment time.

Fixes: f296234c98a8 ("mptcp: Add handling of incoming MP_JOIN requests")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

David Miller May 12, 2020, 7:09 p.m. UTC | #1
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 19:35:21 +0200

> On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 09:24 -0700, Christoph Paasch wrote:
>> When the other MPTCP-peer uses 32-bit data-sequence numbers, we rely on
>> map_seq to indicate how to expand to a 64-bit data-sequence number in
>> expand_seq() when receiving data.
>> 
>> For new subflows, this field is not initialized, thus results in an
>> "invalid" mapping being discarded.
>> 
>> Fix this by initializing map_seq upon subflow establishment time.
>> 
>> Fixes: f296234c98a8 ("mptcp: Add handling of incoming MP_JOIN requests")
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
 ...
> Reviewed-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

Applied, thanks.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index e1f23016ed3f..32ea8d35489a 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1629,6 +1629,8 @@  bool mptcp_finish_join(struct sock *sk)
 
 	ret = mptcp_pm_allow_new_subflow(msk);
 	if (ret) {
+		subflow->map_seq = msk->ack_seq;
+
 		/* active connections are already on conn_list */
 		spin_lock_bh(&msk->join_list_lock);
 		if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&subflow->node)))