diff mbox series

bpf, x86_32: Fix logic error in BPF_LDX zero-extension

Message ID 20200423050637.GA4029@udknight
State Accepted
Delegated to: BPF Maintainers
Headers show
Series bpf, x86_32: Fix logic error in BPF_LDX zero-extension | expand

Commit Message

Wang YanQing April 23, 2020, 5:06 a.m. UTC
When verifier_zext is true, we don't need to emit code
for zero-extension.

Fixes: 836256bf ("x32: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen")

Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Alexei Starovoitov April 25, 2020, 12:25 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:18 PM Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When verifier_zext is true, we don't need to emit code
> for zero-extension.
>
> Fixes: 836256bf ("x32: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen")
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>

Applied.
Please make sure fixes tag looks like this:
Fixes: 836256bf5f37 ("x32: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen")

all 12 digits.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 4d2a7a764602..ed34dd16ebc5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -1847,7 +1847,7 @@  static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
 			case BPF_B:
 			case BPF_H:
 			case BPF_W:
-				if (!bpf_prog->aux->verifier_zext)
+				if (bpf_prog->aux->verifier_zext)
 					break;
 				if (dstk) {
 					EMIT3(0xC7, add_1reg(0x40, IA32_EBP),