diff mbox series

[net-next,2/6] net/smc: use termination worker under send_lock

Message ID 20200217152455.15341-3-ubraun@linux.ibm.com
State Accepted
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show
Series net/smc: patches 2020-02-17 | expand

Commit Message

Ursula Braun Feb. 17, 2020, 3:24 p.m. UTC 
From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>

smc_tx_rdma_write() is called under the send_lock and should not call
smc_lgr_terminate() directly. Call smc_lgr_terminate_sched() instead
which schedules a worker.

Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_tx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_tx.c b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
index 0d42e7716b91..9f1ade86d70e 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_tx.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@  static int smc_tx_rdma_write(struct smc_connection *conn, int peer_rmbe_offset,
 	rdma_wr->rkey = lgr->rtokens[conn->rtoken_idx][SMC_SINGLE_LINK].rkey;
 	rc = ib_post_send(link->roce_qp, &rdma_wr->wr, NULL);
 	if (rc)
-		smc_lgr_terminate(lgr, true);
+		smc_lgr_terminate_sched(lgr);
 	return rc;
 }