@@ -1479,9 +1479,9 @@ static inline void skb_mark_not_on_list(struct sk_buff *skb)
}
/* Iterate through singly-linked GSO fragments of an skb. */
-#define skb_list_walk_safe(first, skb, next) \
- for ((skb) = (first), (next) = (skb) ? (skb)->next : NULL; (skb); \
- (skb) = (next), (next) = (skb) ? (skb)->next : NULL)
+#define skb_list_walk_safe(first, skb, next_skb) \
+ for ((skb) = (first), (next_skb) = (skb) ? (skb)->next : NULL; (skb); \
+ (skb) = (next_skb), (next_skb) = (skb) ? (skb)->next : NULL)
static inline void skb_list_del_init(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
This worked before, because we made all callers name their next pointer "next". But in trying to be more "drop-in" ready, the silliness here is revealed. This commit fixes the problem by making the macro argument and the member use different names. Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> --- include/linux/skbuff.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)