From patchwork Wed Aug 21 19:23:58 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1151141 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming-bpf@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-bpf@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DHfW6YcFz9s7T for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 05:24:35 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729782AbfHUTYb (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:24:31 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:50406 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729467AbfHUTYb (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:24:31 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7LJLojX085425 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:24:30 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uhb7u20ga-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:24:30 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:24:27 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:24:24 +0100 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x7LJON4C50331762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 19:24:23 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87046A405C; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 19:24:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B602A405B; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 19:24:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naverao1-tp.ibmuc.com (unknown [9.85.72.179]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 19:24:21 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jiong Wang Cc: Michael Ellerman , , , , Subject: [PATCH] bpf: handle 32-bit zext during constant blinding Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:53:58 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19082119-0012-0000-0000-00000341366C X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19082119-0013-0000-0000-0000217B5F31 Message-Id: <20190821192358.31922-1-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-08-21_06:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908210186 Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Since BPF constant blinding is performed after the verifier pass, the ALU32 instructions inserted for doubleword immediate loads don't have a corresponding zext instruction. This is causing a kernel oops on powerpc and can be reproduced by running 'test_cgroup_storage' with bpf_jit_harden=2. Fix this by emitting BPF_ZEXT during constant blinding if prog->aux->verifier_zext is set. Fixes: a4b1d3c1ddf6cb ("bpf: verifier: insert zero extension according to analysis result") Reported-by: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Reviewed-by: Jiong Wang --- Changes since RFC: - Removed changes to ALU32 and JMP32 ops since those don't alter program execution, and the verifier would have already accounted for them. kernel/bpf/core.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 8191a7db2777..66088a9e9b9e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -890,7 +890,8 @@ int bpf_jit_get_func_addr(const struct bpf_prog *prog, static int bpf_jit_blind_insn(const struct bpf_insn *from, const struct bpf_insn *aux, - struct bpf_insn *to_buff) + struct bpf_insn *to_buff, + bool emit_zext) { struct bpf_insn *to = to_buff; u32 imm_rnd = get_random_int(); @@ -1005,6 +1006,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_blind_insn(const struct bpf_insn *from, case 0: /* Part 2 of BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW. */ *to++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_AX, imm_rnd ^ aux[0].imm); *to++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_AX, imm_rnd); + if (emit_zext) + *to++ = BPF_ZEXT_REG(BPF_REG_AX); *to++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, aux[0].dst_reg, BPF_REG_AX); break; @@ -1088,7 +1091,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_jit_blind_constants(struct bpf_prog *prog) insn[1].code == 0) memcpy(aux, insn, sizeof(aux)); - rewritten = bpf_jit_blind_insn(insn, aux, insn_buff); + rewritten = bpf_jit_blind_insn(insn, aux, insn_buff, + clone->aux->verifier_zext); if (!rewritten) continue;