diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v4,3/4] bpf: cgroup: properly use bpf_prog_array api

Message ID 20190528211444.166437-3-sdf@google.com
State Accepted
Delegated to: BPF Maintainers
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,v4,1/4] bpf: remove __rcu annotations from bpf_prog_array | expand

Commit Message

Stanislav Fomichev May 28, 2019, 9:14 p.m. UTC 
Now that we don't have __rcu markers on the bpf_prog_array helpers,
let's use proper rcu_dereference_protected to obtain array pointer
under mutex.

We also don't need __rcu annotations on cgroup_bpf.inactive since
it's not read/updated concurrently.

v4:
* drop cgroup_rcu_xyz wrappers and use rcu APIs directly; presumably
  should be more clear to understand which mutex/refcount protects
  each particular place

v3:
* amend cgroup_rcu_dereference to include percpu_ref_is_dying;
  cgroup_bpf is now reference counted and we don't hold cgroup_mutex
  anymore in cgroup_bpf_release

v2:
* replace xchg with rcu_swap_protected

Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h |  2 +-
 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c        | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

Roman Gushchin May 28, 2019, 9:48 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 02:14:43PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Now that we don't have __rcu markers on the bpf_prog_array helpers,
> let's use proper rcu_dereference_protected to obtain array pointer
> under mutex.
> 
> We also don't need __rcu annotations on cgroup_bpf.inactive since
> it's not read/updated concurrently.
> 
> v4:
> * drop cgroup_rcu_xyz wrappers and use rcu APIs directly; presumably
>   should be more clear to understand which mutex/refcount protects
>   each particular place
> 
> v3:
> * amend cgroup_rcu_dereference to include percpu_ref_is_dying;
>   cgroup_bpf is now reference counted and we don't hold cgroup_mutex
>   anymore in cgroup_bpf_release
> 
> v2:
> * replace xchg with rcu_swap_protected
> 
> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>

Yeah, the looks even better.

Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>

Thanks!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
index 9f100fc422c3..b631ee75762d 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@  struct cgroup_bpf {
 	u32 flags[MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE];
 
 	/* temp storage for effective prog array used by prog_attach/detach */
-	struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *inactive;
+	struct bpf_prog_array *inactive;
 
 	/* reference counter used to detach bpf programs after cgroup removal */
 	struct percpu_ref refcnt;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
index d995edbe816d..ff594eb86fd7 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@  static void cgroup_bpf_release(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct cgroup *cgrp = container_of(work, struct cgroup,
 					   bpf.release_work);
 	enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype;
+	struct bpf_prog_array *old_array;
 	unsigned int type;
 
 	for (type = 0; type < ARRAY_SIZE(cgrp->bpf.progs); type++) {
@@ -54,7 +55,10 @@  static void cgroup_bpf_release(struct work_struct *work)
 			kfree(pl);
 			static_branch_dec(&cgroup_bpf_enabled_key);
 		}
-		bpf_prog_array_free(cgrp->bpf.effective[type]);
+		old_array = rcu_dereference_protected(
+				cgrp->bpf.effective[type],
+				percpu_ref_is_dying(&cgrp->bpf.refcnt));
+		bpf_prog_array_free(old_array);
 	}
 
 	percpu_ref_exit(&cgrp->bpf.refcnt);
@@ -126,7 +130,7 @@  static bool hierarchy_allows_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp,
  */
 static int compute_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp,
 				   enum bpf_attach_type type,
-				   struct bpf_prog_array __rcu **array)
+				   struct bpf_prog_array **array)
 {
 	enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype;
 	struct bpf_prog_array *progs;
@@ -164,17 +168,16 @@  static int compute_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp,
 		}
 	} while ((p = cgroup_parent(p)));
 
-	rcu_assign_pointer(*array, progs);
+	*array = progs;
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void activate_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp,
 				     enum bpf_attach_type type,
-				     struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *array)
+				     struct bpf_prog_array *old_array)
 {
-	struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *old_array;
-
-	old_array = xchg(&cgrp->bpf.effective[type], array);
+	rcu_swap_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[type], old_array,
+			   lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
 	/* free prog array after grace period, since __cgroup_bpf_run_*()
 	 * might be still walking the array
 	 */
@@ -191,7 +194,7 @@  int cgroup_bpf_inherit(struct cgroup *cgrp)
  * that array below is variable length
  */
 #define	NR ARRAY_SIZE(cgrp->bpf.effective)
-	struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *arrays[NR] = {};
+	struct bpf_prog_array *arrays[NR] = {};
 	int ret, i;
 
 	ret = percpu_ref_init(&cgrp->bpf.refcnt, cgroup_bpf_release_fn, 0,
@@ -477,10 +480,14 @@  int __cgroup_bpf_query(struct cgroup *cgrp, const union bpf_attr *attr,
 	enum bpf_attach_type type = attr->query.attach_type;
 	struct list_head *progs = &cgrp->bpf.progs[type];
 	u32 flags = cgrp->bpf.flags[type];
+	struct bpf_prog_array *effective;
 	int cnt, ret = 0, i;
 
+	effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[type],
+					      lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
+
 	if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE)
-		cnt = bpf_prog_array_length(cgrp->bpf.effective[type]);
+		cnt = bpf_prog_array_length(effective);
 	else
 		cnt = prog_list_length(progs);
 
@@ -497,8 +504,7 @@  int __cgroup_bpf_query(struct cgroup *cgrp, const union bpf_attr *attr,
 	}
 
 	if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE) {
-		return bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(cgrp->bpf.effective[type],
-						   prog_ids, cnt);
+		return bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(effective, prog_ids, cnt);
 	} else {
 		struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
 		u32 id;