From patchwork Wed Jan 30 17:51:00 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ursula Braun X-Patchwork-Id: 1033692 X-Patchwork-Delegate: davem@davemloft.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43qWBf29wcz9sDB for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 04:51:22 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732619AbfA3RvV (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:51:21 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:53866 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726341AbfA3RvT (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:51:19 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x0UHiYF5071313 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:51:18 -0500 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qbg1a233e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:51:18 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:51:15 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:51:13 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x0UHpC057733560 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:51:12 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BB04203F; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:51:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAF742042; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:51:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.85.9]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:51:11 +0000 (GMT) From: Ursula Braun To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, raspl@linux.ibm.com, ubraun@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH net 1/9] net/smc: fix another sizeof to int comparison Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:51:00 +0100 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.4 In-Reply-To: <20190130175108.103221-1-ubraun@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190130175108.103221-1-ubraun@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19013017-0020-0000-0000-0000030E6F88 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19013017-0021-0000-0000-0000215F74AC Message-Id: <20190130175108.103221-2-ubraun@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-01-30_13:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=731 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901300136 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Comparing an int to a size, which is unsigned, causes the int to become unsigned, giving the wrong result. kernel_sendmsg can return a negative error code. Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun --- net/smc/smc_clc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.c b/net/smc/smc_clc.c index 776e9dfc915d..d53fd588d1f5 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_clc.c +++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.c @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ int smc_clc_send_decline(struct smc_sock *smc, u32 peer_diag_info) vec.iov_len = sizeof(struct smc_clc_msg_decline); len = kernel_sendmsg(smc->clcsock, &msg, &vec, 1, sizeof(struct smc_clc_msg_decline)); - if (len < sizeof(struct smc_clc_msg_decline)) + if (len < 0 || len < sizeof(struct smc_clc_msg_decline)) len = -EPROTO; return len > 0 ? 0 : len; }