From patchwork Tue Jul 28 02:16:51 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: tanhuazhong X-Patchwork-Id: 1337451 X-Patchwork-Delegate: davem@davemloft.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=23.128.96.18; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BG0jr4nFFz9sSn for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:19:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727055AbgG1CTN (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2020 22:19:13 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:8286 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726247AbgG1CTM (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2020 22:19:12 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 8C8081CFD7E6C69A53A6; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:19:07 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.69.192.56) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:19:00 +0800 From: Huazhong Tan To: CC: , , , , , , Guojia Liao , Huazhong Tan Subject: [PATCH net 4/5] net: hns3: fix aRFS FD rules leftover after add a user FD rule Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:16:51 +0800 Message-ID: <1595902612-12880-5-git-send-email-tanhuazhong@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1595902612-12880-1-git-send-email-tanhuazhong@huawei.com> References: <1595902612-12880-1-git-send-email-tanhuazhong@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.69.192.56] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Guojia Liao When user had created a FD rule, all the aRFS rules should be clear up. HNS3 process flow as below: 1.get spin lock of fd_ruls_list 2.clear up all aRFS rules 3.release lock 4.get spin lock of fd_ruls_list 5.creat a rules 6.release lock; There is a short period of time between step 3 and step 4, which would creatting some new aRFS FD rules if driver was receiving packet. So refactor the fd_rule_lock to fix it. Fixes: 441228875706 ("net: hns3: refine the flow director handle") Signed-off-by: Guojia Liao Signed-off-by: Huazhong Tan --- .../ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c | 28 ++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c index bb4a632..cee84e7 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c @@ -5806,9 +5806,9 @@ static int hclge_add_fd_entry(struct hnae3_handle *handle, /* to avoid rule conflict, when user configure rule by ethtool, * we need to clear all arfs rules */ + spin_lock_bh(&hdev->fd_rule_lock); hclge_clear_arfs_rules(handle); - spin_lock_bh(&hdev->fd_rule_lock); ret = hclge_fd_config_rule(hdev, rule); spin_unlock_bh(&hdev->fd_rule_lock); @@ -5851,6 +5851,7 @@ static int hclge_del_fd_entry(struct hnae3_handle *handle, return ret; } +/* make sure being called after lock up with fd_rule_lock */ static void hclge_del_all_fd_entries(struct hnae3_handle *handle, bool clear_list) { @@ -5863,7 +5864,6 @@ static void hclge_del_all_fd_entries(struct hnae3_handle *handle, if (!hnae3_dev_fd_supported(hdev)) return; - spin_lock_bh(&hdev->fd_rule_lock); for_each_set_bit(location, hdev->fd_bmap, hdev->fd_cfg.rule_num[HCLGE_FD_STAGE_1]) hclge_fd_tcam_config(hdev, HCLGE_FD_STAGE_1, true, location, @@ -5880,8 +5880,6 @@ static void hclge_del_all_fd_entries(struct hnae3_handle *handle, bitmap_zero(hdev->fd_bmap, hdev->fd_cfg.rule_num[HCLGE_FD_STAGE_1]); } - - spin_unlock_bh(&hdev->fd_rule_lock); } static int hclge_restore_fd_entries(struct hnae3_handle *handle) @@ -6263,7 +6261,7 @@ static int hclge_add_fd_entry_by_arfs(struct hnae3_handle *handle, u16 queue_id, u16 flow_id, struct flow_keys *fkeys) { struct hclge_vport *vport = hclge_get_vport(handle); - struct hclge_fd_rule_tuples new_tuples; + struct hclge_fd_rule_tuples new_tuples = {}; struct hclge_dev *hdev = vport->back; struct hclge_fd_rule *rule; u16 tmp_queue_id; @@ -6273,19 +6271,17 @@ static int hclge_add_fd_entry_by_arfs(struct hnae3_handle *handle, u16 queue_id, if (!hnae3_dev_fd_supported(hdev)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - memset(&new_tuples, 0, sizeof(new_tuples)); - hclge_fd_get_flow_tuples(fkeys, &new_tuples); - - spin_lock_bh(&hdev->fd_rule_lock); - /* when there is already fd rule existed add by user, * arfs should not work */ + spin_lock_bh(&hdev->fd_rule_lock); if (hdev->fd_active_type == HCLGE_FD_EP_ACTIVE) { spin_unlock_bh(&hdev->fd_rule_lock); return -EOPNOTSUPP; } + hclge_fd_get_flow_tuples(fkeys, &new_tuples); + /* check is there flow director filter existed for this flow, * if not, create a new filter for it; * if filter exist with different queue id, modify the filter; @@ -6368,6 +6364,7 @@ static void hclge_rfs_filter_expire(struct hclge_dev *hdev) #endif } +/* make sure being called after lock up with fd_rule_lock */ static void hclge_clear_arfs_rules(struct hnae3_handle *handle) { #ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL @@ -6420,10 +6417,14 @@ static void hclge_enable_fd(struct hnae3_handle *handle, bool enable) hdev->fd_en = enable; clear = hdev->fd_active_type == HCLGE_FD_ARFS_ACTIVE; - if (!enable) + + if (!enable) { + spin_lock_bh(&hdev->fd_rule_lock); hclge_del_all_fd_entries(handle, clear); - else + spin_unlock_bh(&hdev->fd_rule_lock); + } else { hclge_restore_fd_entries(handle); + } } static void hclge_cfg_mac_mode(struct hclge_dev *hdev, bool enable) @@ -6886,8 +6887,9 @@ static void hclge_ae_stop(struct hnae3_handle *handle) int i; set_bit(HCLGE_STATE_DOWN, &hdev->state); - + spin_lock_bh(&hdev->fd_rule_lock); hclge_clear_arfs_rules(handle); + spin_unlock_bh(&hdev->fd_rule_lock); /* If it is not PF reset, the firmware will disable the MAC, * so it only need to stop phy here.