diff mbox series

[bpf] bpf: fix BPF_ALU32 | BPF_ARSH on BE arches

Message ID 1561480910-23543-1-git-send-email-jiong.wang@netronome.com
State Accepted
Delegated to: BPF Maintainers
Headers show
Series [bpf] bpf: fix BPF_ALU32 | BPF_ARSH on BE arches | expand

Commit Message

Jiong Wang June 25, 2019, 4:41 p.m. UTC
Yauheni reported the following code do not work correctly on BE arches:

       ALU_ARSH_X:
               DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> SRC);
               CONT;
       ALU_ARSH_K:
               DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> IMM);
               CONT;

and are causing failure of test_verifier test 'arsh32 on imm 2' on BE
arches.

The code is taking address and interpreting memory directly, so is not
endianness neutral. We should instead perform standard C type casting on
the variable. A u64 to s32 conversion will drop the high 32-bit and reserve
the low 32-bit as signed integer, this is all we want.

Fixes: 2dc6b100f928 ("bpf: interpreter support BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH")
Reported-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/core.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Song Liu June 25, 2019, 8:15 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:31 PM Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> wrote:
>
> Yauheni reported the following code do not work correctly on BE arches:
>
>        ALU_ARSH_X:
>                DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> SRC);
>                CONT;
>        ALU_ARSH_K:
>                DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> IMM);
>                CONT;
>
> and are causing failure of test_verifier test 'arsh32 on imm 2' on BE
> arches.
>
> The code is taking address and interpreting memory directly, so is not
> endianness neutral. We should instead perform standard C type casting on
> the variable. A u64 to s32 conversion will drop the high 32-bit and reserve
> the low 32-bit as signed integer, this is all we want.
>
> Fixes: 2dc6b100f928 ("bpf: interpreter support BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH")
> Reported-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>

I guess we need:

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #v5.0+


> ---
>  kernel/bpf/core.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> index 080e2bb..f2148db 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> @@ -1364,10 +1364,10 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack)
>                 insn++;
>                 CONT;
>         ALU_ARSH_X:
> -               DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> SRC);
> +               DST = (u64) (u32) (((s32) DST) >> SRC);
>                 CONT;
>         ALU_ARSH_K:
> -               DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> IMM);
> +               DST = (u64) (u32) (((s32) DST) >> IMM);
>                 CONT;
>         ALU64_ARSH_X:
>                 (*(s64 *) &DST) >>= SRC;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Daniel Borkmann June 26, 2019, 2:31 p.m. UTC | #2
On 06/25/2019 06:41 PM, Jiong Wang wrote:
> Yauheni reported the following code do not work correctly on BE arches:
> 
>        ALU_ARSH_X:
>                DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> SRC);
>                CONT;
>        ALU_ARSH_K:
>                DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> IMM);
>                CONT;
> 
> and are causing failure of test_verifier test 'arsh32 on imm 2' on BE
> arches.
> 
> The code is taking address and interpreting memory directly, so is not
> endianness neutral. We should instead perform standard C type casting on
> the variable. A u64 to s32 conversion will drop the high 32-bit and reserve
> the low 32-bit as signed integer, this is all we want.
> 
> Fixes: 2dc6b100f928 ("bpf: interpreter support BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH")
> Reported-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>

Applied, thanks!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 080e2bb..f2148db 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1364,10 +1364,10 @@  static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack)
 		insn++;
 		CONT;
 	ALU_ARSH_X:
-		DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> SRC);
+		DST = (u64) (u32) (((s32) DST) >> SRC);
 		CONT;
 	ALU_ARSH_K:
-		DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> IMM);
+		DST = (u64) (u32) (((s32) DST) >> IMM);
 		CONT;
 	ALU64_ARSH_X:
 		(*(s64 *) &DST) >>= SRC;