| Message ID | 1523411006-1905-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Rejected, archived |
| Delegated to: | David Miller |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/2] net: can: sja1000: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in peak_pci_probe | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pcmcia.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pcmcia.c index dd56133..1a1fbf3 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pcmcia.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pcmcia.c @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ static int pcan_add_channels(struct pcan_pccard *card) pcan_write_reg(card, PCC_CCR, ccr); /* wait 2ms before unresetting channels */ - mdelay(2); + usleep_range(2000, 3000); ccr &= ~PCC_CCR_RST_ALL; pcan_write_reg(card, PCC_CCR, ccr);
pcan_add_channels() is never called in atomic context. pcan_add_channels() is only called by pcan_probe(), which is only set as ".probe" in struct pcmcia_driver. Despite never getting called from atomic context, pcan_add_channels() calls mdelay() to busily wait. This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to avoid busy waiting. This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. And I also manually check it. Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com> --- drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pcmcia.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)