Message ID | 20191004231356.135996-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | net: phy: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index | expand |
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:13:53 -0700 > This series switches phy drivers form using fwnode_get_named_gpiod() and > gpiod_get_from_of_node() that are scheduled to be removed in favor > of fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that behaves more like standard > gpiod_get_index() and will potentially handle secondary software > nodes in cases we need to augment platform firmware. > > This depends on the new code that can be bound in > ib-fwnode-gpiod-get-index immutable branch of Linus' Walleij tree: > > git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git ib-fwnode-gpiod-get-index > > I hope that it would be possible to pull in this immutable branch and > not wait until after 5.5 merge window. For series: Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Hi David, On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 04:13:53PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > This series switches phy drivers form using fwnode_get_named_gpiod() and > gpiod_get_from_of_node() that are scheduled to be removed in favor > of fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that behaves more like standard > gpiod_get_index() and will potentially handle secondary software > nodes in cases we need to augment platform firmware. > > This depends on the new code that can be bound in > ib-fwnode-gpiod-get-index immutable branch of Linus' Walleij tree: > > git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git ib-fwnode-gpiod-get-index > > I hope that it would be possible to pull in this immutable branch and > not wait until after 5.5 merge window. I see that the patches are marked as "Not applicable" in the netdev patchwork. Does this mean that you decided against pulling this immutable branch, or you dropped them because of kbuild complaints (that happened because it could not figure out how to apply the patches)? Thanks.
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:42:42 -0700 > I see that the patches are marked as "Not applicable" in the netdev > patchwork. Does this mean that you decided against pulling this > immutable branch, or you dropped them because of kbuild complaints (that > happened because it could not figure out how to apply the patches)? I can't, because the dependencies don't exist in my tree. So submit this into the tree that will have the dependencies.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:05:40PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:42:42 -0700 > > > I see that the patches are marked as "Not applicable" in the netdev > > patchwork. Does this mean that you decided against pulling this > > immutable branch, or you dropped them because of kbuild complaints (that > > happened because it could not figure out how to apply the patches)? > > I can't, because the dependencies don't exist in my tree. > > So submit this into the tree that will have the dependencies. Argh, Gmail decided to stuff your original ACK and this reply in spam so I completely missed it and just fished them out of my spam folder, sorry about that. OK, I'll add your ACKs and forward to Linus Walleij then. I should have had him on the original emails... Thanks!