Message ID | 20190102170023.10415-1-mfo@canonical.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | netfilter: xt_connlimit: backport upstream fixes for race in connection counting | expand |
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com> wrote: > Recently, Alakesh Haloi reported the following issue [1] with stable/4.14: > > """ > An iptable rule like the following on a multicore systems will result in > accepting more connections than set in the rule. > > iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --syn --dport 7777 -m connlimit \ > --connlimit-above 2000 --connlimit-mask 0 -j DROP > """ > > And proposed a fix that is not in Linus's tree. The discussion went on to > confirm whether the issue was still reproducible with mainline/nf.git tip, > and to either identify the upstream fix or re-submit the non-upstream fix. > > Alakesh eventually was able to test with upstream, and reported that issue > was still reproducible [2]. > On that, our findinds diverge, at least in my test environment: > > First, I verified that the suggested mainline fix for the issue [3] indeed > fixes it, by testing with it applied and reverted on v4.18, a clean revert. > (The issue is reproducible with the commit reverted). > > Then, with a consistent reproducer, I moved to nf.git, with HEAD on commit > a007232 ("netfilter: nf_conncount: fix argument order to find_next_bit"), > and the issues was not reproducible (even with 20+ threads on client side, > the number Alakesh reported to achieve 2150+ connections [4], and I tried > spreading the network interface IRQ affinity over more and more CPUs too.) > > Either way, the suggested mainline fix does actually fix the issue in 4.14 > for at least one environment. So, it might well be the case that Alakesh's > test environment has differences/subtleties that leads to more connections > accepted, and more commits are needed for that particular environment type. nf_conncount has a design flaw that is only closed in nf.git/net.git at the time of this writing, so results with earlier kernels (including 4.20) might just fail with different bugs. 4.14 doesn't have those problems, so I think this series (aside from the nit in patch 4/4) indeed should fix the issue reported. > But for now, with one bare-metal environment (24-core server, 4-core client) > verified, I thought of submitting the patches for review/comments/testing, > then looking for additional fixes for that environment separately. 4.14 should be good after this afaics. Thanks a lot for doing this backport and the details testing information.
Florian, On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 3:17 PM Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote: > > Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com> wrote: <snip> > > Either way, the suggested mainline fix does actually fix the issue in 4.14 > > for at least one environment. So, it might well be the case that Alakesh's > > test environment has differences/subtleties that leads to more connections > > accepted, and more commits are needed for that particular environment type. > > nf_conncount has a design flaw that is only closed in nf.git/net.git > at the time of this writing, so results with earlier kernels (including > 4.20) might just fail with different bugs. > > 4.14 doesn't have those problems, so I think this series (aside from the > nit in patch 4/4) indeed should fix the issue reported. Thanks for mentioning that. It offers some relief about the different results observed. > > But for now, with one bare-metal environment (24-core server, 4-core client) > > verified, I thought of submitting the patches for review/comments/testing, > > then looking for additional fixes for that environment separately. > > 4.14 should be good after this afaics. > > Thanks a lot for doing this backport and the details testing > information. Thank you a lot for your quick and careful review. I'll build/test/submit a PATCH v2 series (with that fix to patch 4/4) shortly. cheers,