From patchwork Wed Jul 19 10:37:42 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Cyril Hrubis X-Patchwork-Id: 1809815 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux.it (client-ip=2001:1418:10:5::2; helo=picard.linux.it; envelope-from=ltp-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.linux.it; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=RcmEEWTh; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=KpxnPmkR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [IPv6:2001:1418:10:5::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4R5XLY5CM5z20Cs for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 20:36:53 +1000 (AEST) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363D23CAE7B for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:36:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: ltp@lists.linux.it Delivered-To: ltp@picard.linux.it Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E99E93C02F7 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:36:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F57C200926 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:36:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E9DE21AE2; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 10:36:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1689763007; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HwLa1r8NK4LNOdiioCyUjenqXKibRzNCjoM0CtyE62U=; b=RcmEEWThrTaFM1Ox/X3Z6dFqowpt29tRUptv1/eINLpwh8hrewQk9VQvDwZCCV+1dHC9sc 5N06+vPczRQ8Z22dBYvX90V5HaJIIJKFRUxlCaKxCnAJUn1QWLTu7Nmdx9ssQEVHLYCLW+ hUOeUgKWIKwwa+bhysywF0xf1HAXVIc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1689763007; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HwLa1r8NK4LNOdiioCyUjenqXKibRzNCjoM0CtyE62U=; b=KpxnPmkROJndQUIBAGDqRypJCyZIzo8t5DNPXXEwKnK+dk2+qkBbvwBjGmv7skDmk71K8m qBB4IYOHeYY7VyDg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AD0D1361C; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 10:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id epalHL+8t2RORQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 19 Jul 2023 10:36:47 +0000 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Valentin Schneider , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:37:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20230719103743.4775-2-chrubis@suse.cz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230719103743.4775-1-chrubis@suse.cz> References: <20230719103743.4775-1-chrubis@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=7.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on in-7.smtp.seeweb.it Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial value X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jiri Bohac , ltp@lists.linux.it Errors-To: ltp-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Thre is 10% rounding error in the intial value of the sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice with CONFIG_HZ_300=y. This was found with LTP test sched_rr_get_interval01: sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90 sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90 What this test does is to compare the return value from the sched_rr_get_interval() and the sched_rr_timeslice_ms sysctl file and fails if they do not match. The prolem it found is the intial sysctl file value which was computed as: static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * RR_TIMESLICE; which works fine as long as MSEC_PER_SEC is multiple of HZ, however it introduces 10% rounding error for CONFIG_HZ_300: (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * (100 * HZ / 1000) (1000 / 300) * (100 * 300 / 1000) 3 * 30 = 90 This can be easily fixed by reversing the order of the multiplication and division. After this fix we get: (MSEC_PER_SEC * (100 * HZ / 1000)) / HZ (1000 * (100 * 300 / 1000)) / 300 (1000 * 30) / 300 = 100 Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis CC: Jiri Bohac Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel Acked-by: Mel Gorman Tested-by: Petr Vorel --- kernel/sched/rt.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c index 00e0e5074115..185d3d749f6b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ unsigned int sysctl_sched_rt_period = 1000000; int sysctl_sched_rt_runtime = 950000; #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL -static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * RR_TIMESLICE; +static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC * RR_TIMESLICE) / HZ; static int sched_rt_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos); static int sched_rr_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,