From patchwork Fri Jul 26 23:51:30 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sean Christopherson X-Patchwork-Id: 1965485 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=C5zPkJs5; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WW4gc1w1dz1yY9 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 10:07:24 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=C5zPkJs5; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WW4gc0vD7z3dVp for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 10:07:24 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=C5zPkJs5; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::114a; helo=mail-yw1-x114a.google.com; envelope-from=38dakzgykdcszlhuqjnvvnsl.jvtspubewwj-klcspzaz.vgshiz.vyn@flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mail-yw1-x114a.google.com (mail-yw1-x114a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::114a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WW4MQ3CNmz3d8S for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 09:53:22 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-yw1-x114a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-66619cb2d3eso5958457b3.2 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:53:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1722038000; x=1722642800; darn=lists.ozlabs.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=khS3+Cji6+1mvvdZyBUq0wqzq89EmN0cfXvMph1EjiU=; b=C5zPkJs5BKd6hBpk6bk7pdPZIbj/uK+Ryup46C9tjtjoYPMIh8XavMiYv4bVfQiw9o 5Vww+DBrI8xuUNMX8wsEdzDuxyLL1nCS7XZ7dr2okI0g5NQ/mYTwKCvuIH7hgP+wNwP/ 7b8AYV4M0ER7x0aZ2WRxQGUVk+BY7ocgGrzAZpswarDAQdJKNayfsZ1uUEN8Ku+3KL1B L8Y+jxntpKdTnXey/BNYch+HmVW4ccKR4OO/AySkaQkldoAdzUcntc5y3+3aWk/6iJyd 2xhgeosYb+noUxpvDrICJv4cSF2AJORcnSmL1LDDhO9/HK4M73IwZsA2BMnlneUX/cDs 7YLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722038000; x=1722642800; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=khS3+Cji6+1mvvdZyBUq0wqzq89EmN0cfXvMph1EjiU=; b=MCJyCDu1HtmiXjdAKyx2gCuX1Pk+6bp3jokYAZCQWpJumqS4h/0vQSRZpS478BFwY8 e8+FECpRb5rUSANskBH/UAVQGtjbN1eYLnN7mZy6Pqq0rGfPzBPVcux0E2mspswVVjVo xPQHRboaentcvakCXRDYHWXJxjkP2y6N8iMVZZquGMkTpEb07rdNRdCRLH/nc1TDFa6t aBa7X4lBg+Bchwu4vwNXi+f638kGTjf7HfqGwgpNhIy8nJEBKhIJ9I3Z9tktoJQJoziq 2eJXb72NNjjiax0jwnfR8BxFkxld2tp9QAyBQT0TvQRBkjRtz5KyMZ/mNfGY0FSzuiE/ 7oNA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXcDzon5gaLompstHD7XiZmUDpOT2Cwhf5esOcJYWrhCcopL/J/U+6aYWAbEY/ohJb10AY71YiGRCcxJ1KM3wk7pModM7+1u30N+NAKIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YweBxRAUJHYkU/iEVbMHpWznpTQNa4TWeXaGGVu/amyPpWLlh1q tsS21GK+bN9ln7RDqoFMGLWjHYcu6RiZEOdUSdCAPh3JbxXGnnFY61lIag0ekl6X7UfAkrK8NeF TdA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHn8ljNba0QNoBWKfaXu8Wx8VTGIoZ1RPeW8pDsltrF/Hl6Iy7/rU4VvDeHaG7eZvfgbbZBLlqPjFc= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a05:690c:806:b0:64a:8aec:617c with SMTP id 00721157ae682-679fffd3e35mr362617b3.0.1722038000511; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:51:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20240726235234.228822-1-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20240726235234.228822-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0.rc1.232.g9752f9e123-goog Message-ID: <20240726235234.228822-22-seanjc@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v12 21/84] KVM: nVMX: Rely on kvm_vcpu_unmap() to track validity of eVMCS mapping From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Tianrui Zhao , Bibo Mao , Huacai Chen , Michael Ellerman , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , Sean Christopherson X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Sean Christopherson Cc: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Matlack , David Stevens , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Remove the explicit evmptr12 validity check when deciding whether or not to unmap the eVMCS pointer, and instead rely on kvm_vcpu_unmap() to play nice with a NULL map->hva, i.e. to do nothing if the map is invalid. Note, vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_map is zero-allocated along with the rest of vcpu_vmx, i.e. the map starts out invalid/NULL. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c index 2392a7ef254d..a34b49ea64b5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c @@ -231,11 +231,8 @@ static inline void nested_release_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_vcpu = to_hv_vcpu(vcpu); struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu); - if (nested_vmx_is_evmptr12_valid(vmx)) { - kvm_vcpu_unmap(vcpu, &vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_map, true); - vmx->nested.hv_evmcs = NULL; - } - + kvm_vcpu_unmap(vcpu, &vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_map, true); + vmx->nested.hv_evmcs = NULL; vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr = EVMPTR_INVALID; if (hv_vcpu) {