@@ -5,10 +5,11 @@
* Test the kernel's signal frame code.
*
* The kernel sets up two sets of ucontexts if the signal was to be
- * delivered while the thread was in a transaction.
+ * delivered while the thread was in a transaction (referred too as
+ * first and second contexts).
* Expected behaviour is that the checkpointed state is in the user
- * context passed to the signal handler. The speculated state can be
- * accessed with the uc_link pointer.
+ * context passed to the signal handler (first context). The speculated
+ * state can be accessed with the uc_link pointer (second context).
*
* The rationale for this is that if TM unaware code (which linked
* against TM libs) installs a signal handler it will not know of the
@@ -28,17 +29,20 @@
#define MAX_ATTEMPT 500000
-#define NV_FPU_REGS 18
+#define NV_FPU_REGS 18 /* Number of non-volatile FP registers */
+#define FPR14 14 /* First non-volatile FP register to check in f14-31 subset */
long tm_signal_self_context_load(pid_t pid, long *gprs, double *fps, vector int *vms, vector int *vss);
-/* Be sure there are 2x as many as there are NV FPU regs (2x18) */
+/* Test only non-volatile registers, i.e. 18 fpr registers from f14 to f31 */
static double fps[] = {
+ /* First context will be set with these values, i.e. non-speculative */
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
+ /* Second context will be set with these values, i.e. speculative */
-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-6,-7,-8,-9,-10,-11,-12,-13,-14,-15,-16,-17,-18
};
-static sig_atomic_t fail;
+static sig_atomic_t fail, broken;
static void signal_usr1(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *uc)
{
@@ -46,11 +50,24 @@ static void signal_usr1(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *uc)
ucontext_t *ucp = uc;
ucontext_t *tm_ucp = ucp->uc_link;
- for (i = 0; i < NV_FPU_REGS && !fail; i++) {
- fail = (ucp->uc_mcontext.fp_regs[i + 14] != fps[i]);
- fail |= (tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.fp_regs[i + 14] != fps[i + NV_FPU_REGS]);
- if (fail)
- printf("Failed on %d FP %g or %g\n", i, ucp->uc_mcontext.fp_regs[i + 14], tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.fp_regs[i + 14]);
+ for (i = 0; i < NV_FPU_REGS; i++) {
+ /* Check first context. Print all mismatches. */
+ fail = (ucp->uc_mcontext.fp_regs[FPR14 + i] != fps[i]);
+ if (fail) {
+ broken = 1;
+ printf("FPR%d (1st context) == %g instead of %g (expected)\n",
+ FPR14 + i, ucp->uc_mcontext.fp_regs[FPR14 + i], fps[i]);
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NV_FPU_REGS; i++) {
+ /* Check second context. Print all mismatches. */
+ fail = (tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.fp_regs[FPR14 + i] != fps[NV_FPU_REGS + i]);
+ if (fail) {
+ broken = 1;
+ printf("FPR%d (2nd context) == %g instead of %g (expected)\n",
+ FPR14 + i, tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.fp_regs[FPR14 + i], fps[NV_FPU_REGS + i]);
+ }
}
}
@@ -72,13 +89,19 @@ static int tm_signal_context_chk_fpu()
}
i = 0;
- while (i < MAX_ATTEMPT && !fail) {
+ while (i < MAX_ATTEMPT && !broken) {
+ /*
+ * tm_signal_self_context_load will set both first and second
+ * contexts accordingly to the values passed through non-NULL
+ * array pointers to it, in that case 'fps', and invoke the
+ * signal handler installed for SIGUSR1.
+ */
rc = tm_signal_self_context_load(pid, NULL, fps, NULL, NULL);
FAIL_IF(rc != pid);
i++;
}
- return fail;
+ return (broken);
}
int main(void)
@@ -5,10 +5,11 @@
* Test the kernel's signal frame code.
*
* The kernel sets up two sets of ucontexts if the signal was to be
- * delivered while the thread was in a transaction.
+ * delivered while the thread was in a transaction (referred too as
+ * first and second contexts).
* Expected behaviour is that the checkpointed state is in the user
- * context passed to the signal handler. The speculated state can be
- * accessed with the uc_link pointer.
+ * context passed to the signal handler (first context). The speculated
+ * state can be accessed with the uc_link pointer (second context).
*
* The rationale for this is that if TM unaware code (which linked
* against TM libs) installs a signal handler it will not know of the
@@ -28,14 +29,22 @@
#define MAX_ATTEMPT 500000
-#define NV_GPR_REGS 18
+#define NV_GPR_REGS 18 /* Number of non-volatile GPR registers */
+#define R14 14 /* First non-volatile register to check in r14-r31 subset */
long tm_signal_self_context_load(pid_t pid, long *gprs, double *fps, vector int *vms, vector int *vss);
-static sig_atomic_t fail;
+static sig_atomic_t fail, broken;
-static long gps[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
- -1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-6,-7,-8,-9,-10,-11,-12,-13,-14,-15,-16,-17,-18};
+/* Test only non-volatile general purpose registers, i.e. r14-r31 */
+static long gprs[] = {
+ /* First context will be set with these values, i.e. non-speculative */
+ /* R14, R15, ... */
+ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
+ /* Second context will be set with these values, i.e. speculative */
+ /* R14, R15, ... */
+ -1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-6,-7,-8,-9,-10,-11,-12,-13,-14,-15,-16,-17,-18
+};
static void signal_usr1(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *uc)
{
@@ -43,12 +52,24 @@ static void signal_usr1(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *uc)
ucontext_t *ucp = uc;
ucontext_t *tm_ucp = ucp->uc_link;
- for (i = 0; i < NV_GPR_REGS && !fail; i++) {
- fail = (ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[i + 14] != gps[i]);
- fail |= (tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[i + 14] != gps[i + NV_GPR_REGS]);
- if (fail)
- printf("Failed on %d GPR %lu or %lu\n", i,
- ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[i + 14], tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[i + 14]);
+ /* Check first context. Print all mismatches. */
+ for (i = 0; i < NV_GPR_REGS; i++) {
+ fail = (ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[R14 + i] != gprs[i]);
+ if (fail) {
+ broken = 1;
+ printf("GPR%d (1st context) == %lu instead of %lu (expected)\n",
+ R14 + i, ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[R14 + i], gprs[i]);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Check second context. Print all mismatches. */
+ for (i = 0; i < NV_GPR_REGS; i++) {
+ fail = (tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[R14 + i] != gprs[NV_GPR_REGS + i]);
+ if (fail) {
+ broken = 1;
+ printf("GPR%d (2nd context) == %lu instead of %lu (expected)\n",
+ R14 + i, tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[R14 + i], gprs[NV_GPR_REGS + i]);
+ }
}
}
@@ -70,13 +91,19 @@ static int tm_signal_context_chk_gpr()
}
i = 0;
- while (i < MAX_ATTEMPT && !fail) {
- rc = tm_signal_self_context_load(pid, gps, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ while (i < MAX_ATTEMPT && !broken) {
+ /*
+ * tm_signal_self_context_load will set both first and second
+ * contexts accordingly to the values passed through non-NULL
+ * array pointers to it, in that case 'gprs', and invoke the
+ * signal handler installed for SIGUSR1.
+ */
+ rc = tm_signal_self_context_load(pid, gprs, NULL, NULL, NULL);
FAIL_IF(rc != pid);
i++;
}
- return fail;
+ return broken;
}
int main(void)
@@ -5,10 +5,11 @@
* Test the kernel's signal frame code.
*
* The kernel sets up two sets of ucontexts if the signal was to be
- * delivered while the thread was in a transaction.
+ * delivered while the thread was in a transaction (referred too as
+ * first and second contexts).
* Expected behaviour is that the checkpointed state is in the user
- * context passed to the signal handler. The speculated state can be
- * accessed with the uc_link pointer.
+ * context passed to the signal handler (first context). The speculated
+ * state can be accessed with the uc_link pointer (second context).
*
* The rationale for this is that if TM unaware code (which linked
* against TM libs) installs a signal handler it will not know of the
@@ -29,18 +30,24 @@
#define MAX_ATTEMPT 500000
-#define NV_VMX_REGS 12
+#define NV_VMX_REGS 12 /* Number of non-volatile VMX registers */
+#define VMX20 20 /* First non-volatile register to check in vr20-31 subset */
long tm_signal_self_context_load(pid_t pid, long *gprs, double *fps, vector int *vms, vector int *vss);
-static sig_atomic_t fail;
+static sig_atomic_t fail, broken;
+/* Test only non-volatile registers, i.e. 12 vmx registers from vr20 to vr31 */
vector int vms[] = {
- {1, 2, 3, 4 },{5, 6, 7, 8 },{9, 10,11,12},
+ /* First context will be set with these values, i.e. non-speculative */
+ /* VMX20 , VMX21 , ... */
+ { 1, 2, 3, 4},{ 5, 6, 7, 8},{ 9,10,11,12},
{13,14,15,16},{17,18,19,20},{21,22,23,24},
{25,26,27,28},{29,30,31,32},{33,34,35,36},
{37,38,39,40},{41,42,43,44},{45,46,47,48},
- {-1, -2, -3, -4}, {-5, -6, -7, -8}, {-9, -10,-11,-12},
+ /* Second context will be set with these values, i.e. speculative */
+ /* VMX20 , VMX21 , ... */
+ { -1, -2, -3, -4},{ -5, -6, -7, -8},{ -9,-10,-11,-12},
{-13,-14,-15,-16},{-17,-18,-19,-20},{-21,-22,-23,-24},
{-25,-26,-27,-28},{-29,-30,-31,-32},{-33,-34,-35,-36},
{-37,-38,-39,-40},{-41,-42,-43,-44},{-45,-46,-47,-48}
@@ -48,26 +55,43 @@ vector int vms[] = {
static void signal_usr1(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *uc)
{
- int i;
+ int i, j;
ucontext_t *ucp = uc;
ucontext_t *tm_ucp = ucp->uc_link;
- for (i = 0; i < NV_VMX_REGS && !fail; i++) {
- fail = memcmp(ucp->uc_mcontext.v_regs->vrregs[i + 20],
+ for (i = 0; i < NV_VMX_REGS; i++) {
+ /* Check first context. Print all mismatches. */
+ fail = memcmp(ucp->uc_mcontext.v_regs->vrregs[VMX20 + i],
&vms[i], sizeof(vector int));
- fail |= memcmp(tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.v_regs->vrregs[i + 20],
- &vms[i + NV_VMX_REGS], sizeof (vector int));
-
if (fail) {
- int j;
+ broken = 1;
+ printf("VMX%d (1st context) == 0x", VMX20 + i);
+ /* Print actual value in first context. */
+ for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
+ printf("%08x", ucp->uc_mcontext.v_regs->vrregs[VMX20 + i][j]);
+ printf(" instead of 0x");
+ /* Print expected value. */
+ for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
+ printf("%08x", vms[i][j]);
+ printf(" (expected)\n");
+ }
+ }
- fprintf(stderr, "Failed on %d vmx 0x", i);
+ for (i = 0; i < NV_VMX_REGS; i++) {
+ /* Check second context. Print all mismatches. */
+ fail = memcmp(tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.v_regs->vrregs[VMX20 + i],
+ &vms[NV_VMX_REGS + i], sizeof (vector int));
+ if (fail) {
+ broken = 1;
+ printf("VMX%d (2nd context) == 0x", NV_VMX_REGS + i);
+ /* Print actual value in second context. */
+ for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
+ printf("%08x", tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.v_regs->vrregs[VMX20 + i][j]);
+ printf(" instead of 0x");
+ /* Print expected value. */
for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
- fprintf(stderr, "%04x", ucp->uc_mcontext.v_regs->vrregs[i + 20][j]);
- fprintf(stderr, " vs 0x");
- for (j = 0 ; j < 4; j++)
- fprintf(stderr, "%04x", tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.v_regs->vrregs[i + 20][j]);
- fprintf(stderr, "\n");
+ printf("%08x", vms[NV_VMX_REGS + i][j]);
+ printf(" (expected)\n");
}
}
}
@@ -90,13 +114,19 @@ static int tm_signal_context_chk()
}
i = 0;
- while (i < MAX_ATTEMPT && !fail) {
+ while (i < MAX_ATTEMPT && !broken) {
+ /*
+ * tm_signal_self_context_load will set both first and second
+ * contexts accordingly to the values passed through non-NULL
+ * array pointers to it, in that case 'vms', and invoke the
+ * signal handler installed for SIGUSR1.
+ */
rc = tm_signal_self_context_load(pid, NULL, NULL, vms, NULL);
FAIL_IF(rc != pid);
i++;
}
- return fail;
+ return (broken);
}
int main(void)
@@ -5,10 +5,11 @@
* Test the kernel's signal frame code.
*
* The kernel sets up two sets of ucontexts if the signal was to be
- * delivered while the thread was in a transaction.
+ * delivered while the thread was in a transaction (referred too as
+ * first and second contexts).
* Expected behaviour is that the checkpointed state is in the user
- * context passed to the signal handler. The speculated state can be
- * accessed with the uc_link pointer.
+ * context passed to the signal handler (first context). The speculated
+ * state can be accessed with the uc_link pointer (second context).
*
* The rationale for this is that if TM unaware code (which linked
* against TM libs) installs a signal handler it will not know of the
@@ -29,17 +30,24 @@
#define MAX_ATTEMPT 500000
-#define NV_VSX_REGS 12
+#define NV_VSX_REGS 12 /* Number of VSX registers to check. */
+#define VSX20 20 /* First VSX register to check in vsr20-vsr31 subset */
+#define FPR20 20 /* FPR20 overlaps VSX20 most significant doubleword */
long tm_signal_self_context_load(pid_t pid, long *gprs, double *fps, vector int *vms, vector int *vss);
-static sig_atomic_t fail;
+static sig_atomic_t fail, broken;
-vector int vss[] = {
- {1, 2, 3, 4 },{5, 6, 7, 8 },{9, 10,11,12},
+/* Test only 12 vsx registers from vsr20 to vsr31 */
+vector int vsxs[] = {
+ /* First context will be set with these values, i.e. non-speculative */
+ /* VSX20 , VSX21 , ... */
+ { 1, 2, 3, 4},{ 5, 6, 7, 8},{ 9,10,11,12},
{13,14,15,16},{17,18,19,20},{21,22,23,24},
{25,26,27,28},{29,30,31,32},{33,34,35,36},
{37,38,39,40},{41,42,43,44},{45,46,47,48},
+ /* Second context will be set with these values, i.e. speculative */
+ /* VSX20 , VSX21 , ... */
{-1, -2, -3, -4 },{-5, -6, -7, -8 },{-9, -10,-11,-12},
{-13,-14,-15,-16},{-17,-18,-19,-20},{-21,-22,-23,-24},
{-25,-26,-27,-28},{-29,-30,-31,-32},{-33,-34,-35,-36},
@@ -48,41 +56,91 @@ vector int vss[] = {
static void signal_usr1(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *uc)
{
- int i;
- uint8_t vsc[sizeof(vector int)];
- uint8_t vst[sizeof(vector int)];
+ int i, j;
+ uint8_t vsx[sizeof(vector int)];
+ uint8_t vsx_tm[sizeof(vector int)];
ucontext_t *ucp = uc;
ucontext_t *tm_ucp = ucp->uc_link;
/*
- * The other half of the VSX regs will be after v_regs.
+ * FP registers and VMX registers overlap the VSX registers.
+ *
+ * FP registers (f0-31) overlap the most significant 64 bits of VSX
+ * registers vsr0-31, whilst VMX registers vr0-31, being 128-bit like
+ * the VSX registers, overlap fully the other half of VSX registers,
+ * i.e. vr0-31 overlaps fully vsr32-63.
+ *
+ * Due to compatibility and historical reasons (VMX/Altivec support
+ * appeared first on the architecture), VMX registers vr0-31 (so VSX
+ * half vsr32-63 too) are stored right after the v_regs pointer, in an
+ * area allocated for 'vmx_reverse' array (please see
+ * arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h for details about the
+ * mcontext_t structure on Power).
+ *
+ * The other VSX half (vsr0-31) is hence stored below vr0-31/vsr32-63
+ * registers, but only the least significant 64 bits of vsr0-31. The
+ * most significant 64 bits of vsr0-31 (f0-31), as it overlaps the FP
+ * registers, is kept in fp_regs.
+ *
+ * v_regs is a 16 byte aligned pointer at the start of vmx_reserve
+ * (vmx_reserve may or may not be 16 aligned) where the v_regs structure
+ * exists, so v_regs points to where vr0-31 / vsr32-63 registers are
+ * fully stored. Since v_regs type is elf_vrregset_t, v_regs + 1
+ * skips all the slots used to store vr0-31 / vsr32-64 and points to
+ * part of one VSX half, i.e. v_regs + 1 points to the least significant
+ * 64 bits of vsr0-31. The other part of this half (the most significant
+ * part of vsr0-31) is stored in fp_regs.
*
- * In short, vmx_reserve array holds everything. v_regs is a 16
- * byte aligned pointer at the start of vmx_reserve (vmx_reserve
- * may or may not be 16 aligned) where the v_regs structure exists.
- * (half of) The VSX regsters are directly after v_regs so the
- * easiest way to find them below.
*/
+ /* Get pointer to least significant doubleword of vsr0-31 */
long *vsx_ptr = (long *)(ucp->uc_mcontext.v_regs + 1);
long *tm_vsx_ptr = (long *)(tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.v_regs + 1);
- for (i = 0; i < NV_VSX_REGS && !fail; i++) {
- memcpy(vsc, &ucp->uc_mcontext.fp_regs[i + 20], 8);
- memcpy(vsc + 8, &vsx_ptr[20 + i], 8);
- fail = memcmp(vsc, &vss[i], sizeof(vector int));
- memcpy(vst, &tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.fp_regs[i + 20], 8);
- memcpy(vst + 8, &tm_vsx_ptr[20 + i], 8);
- fail |= memcmp(vst, &vss[i + NV_VSX_REGS], sizeof(vector int));
- if (fail) {
- int j;
+ /* Check first context. Print all mismatches. */
+ for (i = 0; i < NV_VSX_REGS; i++) {
+ /*
+ * Copy VSX most significant doubleword from fp_regs and
+ * copy VSX least significant one from 64-bit slots below
+ * saved VMX registers.
+ */
+ memcpy(vsx, &ucp->uc_mcontext.fp_regs[FPR20 + i], 8);
+ memcpy(vsx + 8, &vsx_ptr[VSX20 + i], 8);
+
+ fail = memcmp(vsx, &vsxs[i], sizeof(vector int));
- fprintf(stderr, "Failed on %d vsx 0x", i);
+ if (fail) {
+ broken = 1;
+ printf("VSX%d (1st context) == 0x", VSX20 + i);
for (j = 0; j < 16; j++)
- fprintf(stderr, "%02x", vsc[j]);
- fprintf(stderr, " vs 0x");
+ printf("%02x", vsx[j]);
+ printf(" instead of 0x");
+ for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
+ printf("%08x", vsxs[i][j]);
+ printf(" (expected)\n");
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Check second context. Print all mismatches. */
+ for (i = 0; i < NV_VSX_REGS; i++) {
+ /*
+ * Copy VSX most significant doubleword from fp_regs and
+ * copy VSX least significant one from 64-bit slots below
+ * saved VMX registers.
+ */
+ memcpy(vsx_tm, &tm_ucp->uc_mcontext.fp_regs[FPR20 + i], 8);
+ memcpy(vsx_tm + 8, &tm_vsx_ptr[VSX20 + i], 8);
+
+ fail = memcmp(vsx_tm, &vsxs[NV_VSX_REGS + i], sizeof(vector int));
+
+ if (fail) {
+ broken = 1;
+ printf("VSX%d (2nd context) == 0x", VSX20 + i);
for (j = 0; j < 16; j++)
- fprintf(stderr, "%02x", vst[j]);
- fprintf(stderr, "\n");
+ printf("%02x", vsx_tm[j]);
+ printf(" instead of 0x");
+ for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
+ printf("%08x", vsxs[NV_VSX_REGS + i][j]);
+ printf("(expected)\n");
}
}
}
@@ -105,13 +163,19 @@ static int tm_signal_context_chk()
}
i = 0;
- while (i < MAX_ATTEMPT && !fail) {
- rc = tm_signal_self_context_load(pid, NULL, NULL, NULL, vss);
+ while (i < MAX_ATTEMPT && !broken) {
+ /*
+ * tm_signal_self_context_load will set both first and second
+ * contexts accordingly to the values passed through non-NULL
+ * array pointers to it, in that case 'vsxs', and invoke the
+ * signal handler installed for SIGUSR1.
+ */
+ rc = tm_signal_self_context_load(pid, NULL, NULL, NULL, vsxs);
FAIL_IF(rc != pid);
i++;
}
- return fail;
+ return (broken);
}
int main(void)
Currently TM signal context tests for GPR, FPR, VMX, and VSX registers print wrong register numbers (wrongly starting from register 0 instead of the first register in the non-volatile subset). Besides it the output when a mismatch happens is poor giving not much information about which context and which register mismatches, because it prints both contexts at the same time and not a comparison between the value that mismatches and the value expected and, moreover, it stops printing on the first mismatch, but it's important to know if there are other mismatches happening beyond the first one. For instance, this is the current output when a mismatch happens: test: tm_signal_context_chk_gpr tags: git_version:v5.2-8249-g02e970fae465-dirty Failed on 0 GPR 1 or 18446744073709551615 failure: tm_signal_context_chk_gpr test: tm_signal_context_chk_fpu tags: git_version:v5.2-8248-g09c289e3ef80 Failed on 0 FP -1 or -1 failure: tm_signal_context_chk_fpu test: tm_signal_context_chk_vmx tags: git_version:v5.2-8248-g09c289e3ef80 Failed on 0 vmx 0xfffffffffffffffefffffffdfffffffc vs 0xfffffffffffffffefffffffdfffffffc failure: tm_signal_context_chk_vmx test: tm_signal_context_chk_vsx tags: git_version:v5.2-8248-g09c289e3ef80 Failed on 0 vsx 0xfffffffffefffffffdfffffffcffffff vs 0xfffffffffefffffffdfffffffcffffff failure: tm_signal_context_chk_vsx This commit fixes the register numbers printed and enhances the error output by providing a full list of mismatching registers separated by the context (non-speculative or speculative context), for example: test: tm_signal_context_chk_gpr tags: git_version:v5.2-8249-g02e970fae465-dirty GPR14 (1st context) == 1 instead of -1 (expected) GPR15 (1st context) == 2 instead of -2 (expected) GPR14 (2nd context) == 0 instead of 18446744073709551615 (expected) GPR15 (2nd context) == 0 instead of 18446744073709551614 (expected) failure: tm_signal_context_chk_gpr test: tm_signal_context_chk_fpu tags: git_version:v5.2-8249-g02e970fae465-dirty FPR14 (1st context) == -1 instead of 1 (expected) FPR15 (1st context) == -2 instead of 2 (expected) failure: tm_signal_context_chk_fpu test: tm_signal_context_chk_vmx tags: git_version:v5.2-8249-g02e970fae465-dirty VMX20 (1st context) == 0xfffffffffffffffefffffffdfffffffc instead of 0x00000001000000020000000300000004 (expected) VMX21 (1st context) == 0xfffffffbfffffffafffffff9fffffff8 instead of 0x00000005000000060000000700000008 (expected) failure: tm_signal_context_chk_vmx test: tm_signal_context_chk_vsx tags: git_version:v5.2-8249-g02e970fae465-dirty VSX20 (1st context) == 0xfffffffffefffffffdfffffffcffffff instead of 0x00000001000000020000000300000004 (expected) VSX21 (1st context) == 0xfbfffffffafffffff9fffffff8ffffff instead of 0x00000005000000060000000700000008 (expected) failure: tm_signal_context_chk_vsx Finally, this commit adds comments to the tests in the hope that it will help people not so familiar with TM understand the tests. Signed-off-by: Gustavo Romero <gromero@linux.ibm.com> --- .../powerpc/tm/tm-signal-context-chk-fpu.c | 49 +++++-- .../powerpc/tm/tm-signal-context-chk-gpr.c | 59 +++++--- .../powerpc/tm/tm-signal-context-chk-vmx.c | 74 +++++++--- .../powerpc/tm/tm-signal-context-chk-vsx.c | 130 +++++++++++++----- 4 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)