From patchwork Wed Oct 9 18:08:10 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mike Rapoport X-Patchwork-Id: 1995081 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=t22arFAG; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=G0kX8d++; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XP3rW1w7Dz1xvW for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 07:09:31 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=VoDjrKHpUT224dnSitnnGFqJ2by/iZ5cZnUq7cIEdF4=; b=t22arFAGOZHQhYsbwJrCWHAwJw kkSf3stJWp6JMBJTAWewWxtixeQPyngP4h8ii5IGzV3uaFPF7OxiZ4wT7MVLRAkZXFMhxozO6uVp8 fUzPSEgirCmK4TOTRoD0AjOVhPzKJaZNIvbUDsfEDWlldFNv5zn+qnD2yLbS7A9ll79hipHDuVxX1 X6prw0BmT6zxztdy3Sy2uqRLbQv9ulVze1z77f6BRHJOS0YF7/WE+Jg4WOnBMQcoRS8Ssr5xuPzJV nZ7PvnQJll45MGg+u7QY8euEi91OHmhQFUg+qAnOC8POi7ddC/QbVWkpxSmXngs9am8h37sZ1Uu8s cF4fsuAw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1syczx-0000000AZNG-3IeU; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 20:09:29 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:45d1:ec00::3]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1syb7l-0000000AL2H-1pDd; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 18:09:26 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5737A443F5; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 18:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E241CC4CED1; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 18:09:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1728497363; bh=FFXSlSIenlvc/JFQhdQdJ8pK7321CYQcMdI24yMcjAo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=G0kX8d++3ohcTFZeqD0eAoQ74MtboyreAdFmzFvR9aRtbuXWN3SDchQhtM+5RkLBG jqX7ke47OEJex/CacTt4waa6QacCyJ81RiJRPVr8QqyaDiR8H8hYjx0XTtmyIdnCFG axjODV2+3RwN38yxLyaULcbcJt/U99s04WlG8/Z//h5p001Y3IE3heiFH0uYuCQMJ7 mNBhnDqVayh43rZ21MdGN+lW1QzQwynTVOihJ4leLccP0wbDZ9aKt14dLeFlNvrA6H v0V/WDpoydXU23CoF5XBB201VERoxT8fqH1mP+j/B4wZaAW5cApavv7k/ZamamfcQ5 jt5HNV5iXydvQ== From: Mike Rapoport To: Andrew Morton Cc: Andreas Larsson , Andy Lutomirski , Ard Biesheuvel , Arnd Bergmann , Borislav Petkov , Brian Cain , Catalin Marinas , Christoph Hellwig , Christophe Leroy , Dave Hansen , Dinh Nguyen , Geert Uytterhoeven , Guo Ren , Helge Deller , Huacai Chen , Ingo Molnar , Johannes Berg , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Kent Overstreet , "Liam R. Howlett" , Luis Chamberlain , Mark Rutland , Masami Hiramatsu , Matt Turner , Max Filippov , Michael Ellerman , Michal Simek , Mike Rapoport , Oleg Nesterov , Palmer Dabbelt , Peter Zijlstra , Richard Weinberger , Russell King , Song Liu , Stafford Horne , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Thomas Gleixner , Uladzislau Rezki , Vineet Gupta , Will Deacon , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 2/8] mm: vmalloc: don't account for number of nodes for HUGE_VMAP allocations Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 21:08:10 +0300 Message-ID: <20241009180816.83591-3-rppt@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20241009180816.83591-1-rppt@kernel.org> References: <20241009180816.83591-1-rppt@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241009_110925_611783_58B6626A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.88 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" vmalloc allocations with VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP that do not explicitly specify node ID will use huge pages only if size_per_node is larger than a huge page. Still the actual allocated memory is not distri [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.2 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - High trust sender X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" vmalloc allocations with VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP that do not explicitly specify node ID will use huge pages only if size_per_node is larger than a huge page. Still the actual allocated memory is not distributed between nodes and there is no advantage in such approach. On the contrary, BPF allocates SZ_2M * num_possible_nodes() for each new bpf_prog_pack, while it could do with a single huge page per pack. Don't account for number of nodes for VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP with NUMA_NO_NODE and use huge pages whenever the requested allocation size is larger than a huge page. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig --- mm/vmalloc.c | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index 634162271c00..86b2344d7461 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -3763,8 +3763,6 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, } if (vmap_allow_huge && (vm_flags & VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP)) { - unsigned long size_per_node; - /* * Try huge pages. Only try for PAGE_KERNEL allocations, * others like modules don't yet expect huge pages in @@ -3772,13 +3770,10 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, * supporting them. */ - size_per_node = size; - if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) - size_per_node /= num_online_nodes(); - if (arch_vmap_pmd_supported(prot) && size_per_node >= PMD_SIZE) + if (arch_vmap_pmd_supported(prot) && size >= PMD_SIZE) shift = PMD_SHIFT; else - shift = arch_vmap_pte_supported_shift(size_per_node); + shift = arch_vmap_pte_supported_shift(size); align = max(real_align, 1UL << shift); size = ALIGN(real_size, 1UL << shift);