From patchwork Mon Oct 7 06:28:52 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mike Rapoport X-Patchwork-Id: 1993435 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=oDIoR3rE; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=OQrnWRR3; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XMTrg4dFhz1xtb for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:34:11 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=VoDjrKHpUT224dnSitnnGFqJ2by/iZ5cZnUq7cIEdF4=; b=oDIoR3rEFphB2ZmDLURaX2ISxb 1ZaVFktbj34ZFUGe+kxFffFOlqVpx5myJuopcfHD9D0QRJbc/y+WEMcIQfK+GSn2x9jBGCvk96z7Y qxCGGViyraPT///y8meA4VGwoVBILy9gt0anGgKEmc6mMNk7AOF20y8vb/h53aBAxLZEY/fdmx9rk kz6ynciWN3KIRqPhBxh8pw04EZT/gJmS1XBr9jLHZQkiUFcB9nz70Hn0TPgsUZrtBsRor53hZhc0B F5Tz/nVJcZt5WlIyOtYf3iPCRJAVvjYvcNDbUPPITegRjnlYbt8VYASbIVnz3Zx0YbJHP1ZxJi7q+ gRU4QWVw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sxhJp-00000001Rwe-0G47; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 06:34:09 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sxhFi-00000001QMb-3bxq; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 06:29:56 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EF05C59DC; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 06:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF2BFC4CEC6; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 06:29:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1728282594; bh=FFXSlSIenlvc/JFQhdQdJ8pK7321CYQcMdI24yMcjAo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OQrnWRR3/g7hkdwqKSPCCpC6iFIYY/d292H/OkXvsUSIeBCbNT8KZSGMgs98muJ6O hStgp6uWL5I4mPNO24G+F+cFs8u7131j/Ey2uNjues5m4rGfIl+ezO5d7V6cyfXRrB ff1uz0i8ryxaYlWwqB3Tbk2Qfaen2IbD0G0cn3eSzNqjZHyYnCmEOJkRb1lVxqWFoq uXQrayzrXN+XpU2Oiz+opHfaOrJilIbQoWVWPrD++Zkr2uZPOk/qb3+N03ykByAfhN p1iJ7Mmzt/MjewEvg+nhLagLlQ4uD909oU6Ls/cTOKl5Oc1CSXLgqfomaexJDZ7MVY yRZGKqDqoDdLw== From: Mike Rapoport To: Andrew Morton Cc: Andreas Larsson , Andy Lutomirski , Ard Biesheuvel , Arnd Bergmann , Borislav Petkov , Brian Cain , Catalin Marinas , Christoph Hellwig , Christophe Leroy , Dave Hansen , Dinh Nguyen , Geert Uytterhoeven , Guo Ren , Helge Deller , Huacai Chen , Ingo Molnar , Johannes Berg , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Kent Overstreet , "Liam R. Howlett" , Luis Chamberlain , Mark Rutland , Masami Hiramatsu , Matt Turner , Max Filippov , Michael Ellerman , Michal Simek , Mike Rapoport , Oleg Nesterov , Palmer Dabbelt , Peter Zijlstra , Richard Weinberger , Russell King , Song Liu , Stafford Horne , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Thomas Gleixner , Uladzislau Rezki , Vineet Gupta , Will Deacon , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 2/8] mm: vmalloc: don't account for number of nodes for HUGE_VMAP allocations Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 09:28:52 +0300 Message-ID: <20241007062858.44248-3-rppt@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20241007062858.44248-1-rppt@kernel.org> References: <20241007062858.44248-1-rppt@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241006_232955_027439_37BF9579 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.73 ) X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" vmalloc allocations with VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP that do not explicitly specify node ID will use huge pages only if size_per_node is larger than a huge page. Still the actual allocated memory is not distri [...] Content analysis details: (-4.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [2604:1380:4641:c500:0:0:0:1 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.2 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - High trust sender X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" vmalloc allocations with VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP that do not explicitly specify node ID will use huge pages only if size_per_node is larger than a huge page. Still the actual allocated memory is not distributed between nodes and there is no advantage in such approach. On the contrary, BPF allocates SZ_2M * num_possible_nodes() for each new bpf_prog_pack, while it could do with a single huge page per pack. Don't account for number of nodes for VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP with NUMA_NO_NODE and use huge pages whenever the requested allocation size is larger than a huge page. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) --- mm/vmalloc.c | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index 634162271c00..86b2344d7461 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -3763,8 +3763,6 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, } if (vmap_allow_huge && (vm_flags & VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP)) { - unsigned long size_per_node; - /* * Try huge pages. Only try for PAGE_KERNEL allocations, * others like modules don't yet expect huge pages in @@ -3772,13 +3770,10 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, * supporting them. */ - size_per_node = size; - if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) - size_per_node /= num_online_nodes(); - if (arch_vmap_pmd_supported(prot) && size_per_node >= PMD_SIZE) + if (arch_vmap_pmd_supported(prot) && size >= PMD_SIZE) shift = PMD_SHIFT; else - shift = arch_vmap_pte_supported_shift(size_per_node); + shift = arch_vmap_pte_supported_shift(size); align = max(real_align, 1UL << shift); size = ALIGN(real_size, 1UL << shift);