Message ID | 20190820232046.50175-10-brendanhiggins@google.com |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | [v14,01/18] kunit: test: add KUnit test runner core | expand |
Hi Brendan, On 8/20/19 5:20 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote: > Add support for aborting/bailing out of test cases, which is needed for > implementing assertions. > > An assertion is like an expectation, but bails out of the test case > early if the assertion is not met. The idea with assertions is that you > use them to state all the preconditions for your test. Logically > speaking, these are the premises of the test case, so if a premise isn't > true, there is no point in continuing the test case because there are no > conclusions that can be drawn without the premises. Whereas, the > expectation is the thing you are trying to prove. > > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> > Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> > --- > include/kunit/test.h | 2 + > include/kunit/try-catch.h | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++ > kunit/Makefile | 3 +- > kunit/test.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > kunit/try-catch.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 include/kunit/try-catch.h > create mode 100644 kunit/try-catch.c > > diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h > index 6917b186b737a..390ce02f717b6 100644 > --- a/include/kunit/test.h > +++ b/include/kunit/test.h > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > #define _KUNIT_TEST_H > > #include <kunit/assert.h> > +#include <kunit/try-catch.h> > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/types.h> > @@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ struct kunit { > > /* private: internal use only. */ > const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */ > + struct kunit_try_catch try_catch; > /* > * success starts as true, and may only be set to false during a test > * case; thus, it is safe to update this across multiple threads using > diff --git a/include/kunit/try-catch.h b/include/kunit/try-catch.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000..404f336cbdc85 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/kunit/try-catch.h > @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > +/* > + * An API to allow a function, that may fail, to be executed, and recover in a > + * controlled manner. > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC. > + * Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> > + */ > + > +#ifndef _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H > +#define _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H > + > +#include <linux/types.h> > + > +typedef void (*kunit_try_catch_func_t)(void *); > + > +struct completion; > +struct kunit; > + > +/** > + * struct kunit_try_catch - provides a generic way to run code which might fail. > + * @test: The test case that is currently being executed. > + * @try_completion: Completion that the control thread waits on while test runs. > + * @try_result: Contains any errno obtained while running test case. > + * @try: The function, the test case, to attempt to run. > + * @catch: The function called if @try bails out. > + * @context: used to pass user data to the try and catch functions. > + * > + * kunit_try_catch provides a generic, architecture independent way to execute > + * an arbitrary function of type kunit_try_catch_func_t which may bail out by > + * calling kunit_try_catch_throw(). If kunit_try_catch_throw() is called, @try > + * is stopped at the site of invocation and @catch is called. > + * > + * struct kunit_try_catch provides a generic interface for the functionality > + * needed to implement kunit->abort() which in turn is needed for implementing > + * assertions. Assertions allow stating a precondition for a test simplifying > + * how test cases are written and presented. > + * > + * Assertions are like expectations, except they abort (call > + * kunit_try_catch_throw()) when the specified condition is not met. This is > + * useful when you look at a test case as a logical statement about some piece > + * of code, where assertions are the premises for the test case, and the > + * conclusion is a set of predicates, rather expectations, that must all be > + * true. If your premises are violated, it does not makes sense to continue. > + */ > +struct kunit_try_catch { > + /* private: internal use only. */ > + struct kunit *test; > + struct completion *try_completion; > + int try_result; > + kunit_try_catch_func_t try; > + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch; > + void *context; > +}; > + > +void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, > + struct kunit *test, > + kunit_try_catch_func_t try, > + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch); > + > +void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context); > + > +void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch); > + > +static inline int kunit_try_catch_get_result(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch) > +{ > + return try_catch->try_result; > +} > + > +/* > + * Exposed for testing only. > + */ > +void kunit_generic_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch); > + > +#endif /* _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H */ > diff --git a/kunit/Makefile b/kunit/Makefile > index 4e46450bcb3a8..c9176c9c578c6 100644 > --- a/kunit/Makefile > +++ b/kunit/Makefile > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ > obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += test.o \ > string-stream.o \ > - assert.o > + assert.o \ > + try-catch.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += string-stream-test.o > > diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c > index 3cbceb34b3b36..ded9895143209 100644 > --- a/kunit/test.c > +++ b/kunit/test.c > @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ > */ > > #include <kunit/test.h> > +#include <kunit/try-catch.h> > #include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/sched/debug.h> > > static void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test) > { > @@ -162,6 +164,19 @@ static void kunit_fail(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_assert *assert) > WARN_ON(string_stream_destroy(stream)); > } > > +static void __noreturn kunit_abort(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + kunit_try_catch_throw(&test->try_catch); /* Does not return. */ > + > + /* > + * Throw could not abort from test. > + * > + * XXX: we should never reach this line! As kunit_try_catch_throw is > + * marked __noreturn. > + */ > + BUG(); I recall discussion on this. What's the point in keeping thie BUG() around when it doesn't even reach? It can even be a WARN_ON() in that case right? thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:36 AM shuah <shuah@kernel.org> wrote: > > Hi Brendan, > > On 8/20/19 5:20 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote: > > Add support for aborting/bailing out of test cases, which is needed for > > implementing assertions. > > > > An assertion is like an expectation, but bails out of the test case > > early if the assertion is not met. The idea with assertions is that you > > use them to state all the preconditions for your test. Logically > > speaking, these are the premises of the test case, so if a premise isn't > > true, there is no point in continuing the test case because there are no > > conclusions that can be drawn without the premises. Whereas, the > > expectation is the thing you are trying to prove. > > > > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> > > Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > > Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> > > --- > > include/kunit/test.h | 2 + > > include/kunit/try-catch.h | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > kunit/Makefile | 3 +- > > kunit/test.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > kunit/try-catch.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 5 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 include/kunit/try-catch.h > > create mode 100644 kunit/try-catch.c > > > > diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h > > index 6917b186b737a..390ce02f717b6 100644 > > --- a/include/kunit/test.h > > +++ b/include/kunit/test.h > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > > #define _KUNIT_TEST_H > > > > #include <kunit/assert.h> > > +#include <kunit/try-catch.h> > > #include <linux/kernel.h> > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <linux/types.h> > > @@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ struct kunit { > > > > /* private: internal use only. */ > > const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */ > > + struct kunit_try_catch try_catch; > > /* > > * success starts as true, and may only be set to false during a test > > * case; thus, it is safe to update this across multiple threads using > > diff --git a/include/kunit/try-catch.h b/include/kunit/try-catch.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000000..404f336cbdc85 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/include/kunit/try-catch.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > > +/* > > + * An API to allow a function, that may fail, to be executed, and recover in a > > + * controlled manner. > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC. > > + * Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> > > + */ > > + > > +#ifndef _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H > > +#define _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H > > + > > +#include <linux/types.h> > > + > > +typedef void (*kunit_try_catch_func_t)(void *); > > + > > +struct completion; > > +struct kunit; > > + > > +/** > > + * struct kunit_try_catch - provides a generic way to run code which might fail. > > + * @test: The test case that is currently being executed. > > + * @try_completion: Completion that the control thread waits on while test runs. > > + * @try_result: Contains any errno obtained while running test case. > > + * @try: The function, the test case, to attempt to run. > > + * @catch: The function called if @try bails out. > > + * @context: used to pass user data to the try and catch functions. > > + * > > + * kunit_try_catch provides a generic, architecture independent way to execute > > + * an arbitrary function of type kunit_try_catch_func_t which may bail out by > > + * calling kunit_try_catch_throw(). If kunit_try_catch_throw() is called, @try > > + * is stopped at the site of invocation and @catch is called. > > + * > > + * struct kunit_try_catch provides a generic interface for the functionality > > + * needed to implement kunit->abort() which in turn is needed for implementing > > + * assertions. Assertions allow stating a precondition for a test simplifying > > + * how test cases are written and presented. > > + * > > + * Assertions are like expectations, except they abort (call > > + * kunit_try_catch_throw()) when the specified condition is not met. This is > > + * useful when you look at a test case as a logical statement about some piece > > + * of code, where assertions are the premises for the test case, and the > > + * conclusion is a set of predicates, rather expectations, that must all be > > + * true. If your premises are violated, it does not makes sense to continue. > > + */ > > +struct kunit_try_catch { > > + /* private: internal use only. */ > > + struct kunit *test; > > + struct completion *try_completion; > > + int try_result; > > + kunit_try_catch_func_t try; > > + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch; > > + void *context; > > +}; > > + > > +void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, > > + struct kunit *test, > > + kunit_try_catch_func_t try, > > + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch); > > + > > +void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context); > > + > > +void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch); > > + > > +static inline int kunit_try_catch_get_result(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch) > > +{ > > + return try_catch->try_result; > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * Exposed for testing only. > > + */ > > +void kunit_generic_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch); > > + > > +#endif /* _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H */ > > diff --git a/kunit/Makefile b/kunit/Makefile > > index 4e46450bcb3a8..c9176c9c578c6 100644 > > --- a/kunit/Makefile > > +++ b/kunit/Makefile > > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ > > obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += test.o \ > > string-stream.o \ > > - assert.o > > + assert.o \ > > + try-catch.o > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += string-stream-test.o > > > > diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c > > index 3cbceb34b3b36..ded9895143209 100644 > > --- a/kunit/test.c > > +++ b/kunit/test.c > > @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ > > */ > > > > #include <kunit/test.h> > > +#include <kunit/try-catch.h> > > #include <linux/kernel.h> > > +#include <linux/sched/debug.h> > > > > static void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test) > > { > > @@ -162,6 +164,19 @@ static void kunit_fail(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_assert *assert) > > WARN_ON(string_stream_destroy(stream)); > > } > > > > +static void __noreturn kunit_abort(struct kunit *test) > > +{ > > + kunit_try_catch_throw(&test->try_catch); /* Does not return. */ > > + > > + /* > > + * Throw could not abort from test. > > + * > > + * XXX: we should never reach this line! As kunit_try_catch_throw is > > + * marked __noreturn. > > + */ > > + BUG(); > > > I recall discussion on this. What's the point in keeping thie > BUG() around when it doesn't even reach? It can even be a > WARN_ON() in that case right? Originally I had BUG() here, and Frank (I think it was Frank, sorry it was a while ago) told me it should be WARN_ON(). In v12 Stephen told me it should be BUG(), and nobody objected so I went back to making it a BUG() (note I also mentioned this change on the cover letter of v13 and still no one objected). You can see the most recent discussion with Stephen here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20190812182421.141150-1-brendanhiggins@google.com/T/#mb108adc525092dd72fd3368ecae34251bad29edf Cheers
On 8/23/19 10:56 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:36 AM shuah <shuah@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Brendan, >> >> On 8/20/19 5:20 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote: >>> Add support for aborting/bailing out of test cases, which is needed for >>> implementing assertions. >>> >>> An assertion is like an expectation, but bails out of the test case >>> early if the assertion is not met. The idea with assertions is that you >>> use them to state all the preconditions for your test. Logically >>> speaking, these are the premises of the test case, so if a premise isn't >>> true, there is no point in continuing the test case because there are no >>> conclusions that can be drawn without the premises. Whereas, the >>> expectation is the thing you are trying to prove. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> >>> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> >>> --- >>> include/kunit/test.h | 2 + >>> include/kunit/try-catch.h | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>> kunit/Makefile | 3 +- >>> kunit/test.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- >>> kunit/try-catch.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 5 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 include/kunit/try-catch.h >>> create mode 100644 kunit/try-catch.c >>> >>> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h >>> index 6917b186b737a..390ce02f717b6 100644 >>> --- a/include/kunit/test.h >>> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h >>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ >>> #define _KUNIT_TEST_H >>> >>> #include <kunit/assert.h> >>> +#include <kunit/try-catch.h> >>> #include <linux/kernel.h> >>> #include <linux/slab.h> >>> #include <linux/types.h> >>> @@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ struct kunit { >>> >>> /* private: internal use only. */ >>> const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */ >>> + struct kunit_try_catch try_catch; >>> /* >>> * success starts as true, and may only be set to false during a test >>> * case; thus, it is safe to update this across multiple threads using >>> diff --git a/include/kunit/try-catch.h b/include/kunit/try-catch.h >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000000000..404f336cbdc85 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/include/kunit/try-catch.h >>> @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ >>> +/* >>> + * An API to allow a function, that may fail, to be executed, and recover in a >>> + * controlled manner. >>> + * >>> + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC. >>> + * Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> >>> + */ >>> + >>> +#ifndef _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H >>> +#define _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H >>> + >>> +#include <linux/types.h> >>> + >>> +typedef void (*kunit_try_catch_func_t)(void *); >>> + >>> +struct completion; >>> +struct kunit; >>> + >>> +/** >>> + * struct kunit_try_catch - provides a generic way to run code which might fail. >>> + * @test: The test case that is currently being executed. >>> + * @try_completion: Completion that the control thread waits on while test runs. >>> + * @try_result: Contains any errno obtained while running test case. >>> + * @try: The function, the test case, to attempt to run. >>> + * @catch: The function called if @try bails out. >>> + * @context: used to pass user data to the try and catch functions. >>> + * >>> + * kunit_try_catch provides a generic, architecture independent way to execute >>> + * an arbitrary function of type kunit_try_catch_func_t which may bail out by >>> + * calling kunit_try_catch_throw(). If kunit_try_catch_throw() is called, @try >>> + * is stopped at the site of invocation and @catch is called. >>> + * >>> + * struct kunit_try_catch provides a generic interface for the functionality >>> + * needed to implement kunit->abort() which in turn is needed for implementing >>> + * assertions. Assertions allow stating a precondition for a test simplifying >>> + * how test cases are written and presented. >>> + * >>> + * Assertions are like expectations, except they abort (call >>> + * kunit_try_catch_throw()) when the specified condition is not met. This is >>> + * useful when you look at a test case as a logical statement about some piece >>> + * of code, where assertions are the premises for the test case, and the >>> + * conclusion is a set of predicates, rather expectations, that must all be >>> + * true. If your premises are violated, it does not makes sense to continue. >>> + */ >>> +struct kunit_try_catch { >>> + /* private: internal use only. */ >>> + struct kunit *test; >>> + struct completion *try_completion; >>> + int try_result; >>> + kunit_try_catch_func_t try; >>> + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch; >>> + void *context; >>> +}; >>> + >>> +void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, >>> + struct kunit *test, >>> + kunit_try_catch_func_t try, >>> + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch); >>> + >>> +void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context); >>> + >>> +void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch); >>> + >>> +static inline int kunit_try_catch_get_result(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch) >>> +{ >>> + return try_catch->try_result; >>> +} >>> + >>> +/* >>> + * Exposed for testing only. >>> + */ >>> +void kunit_generic_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch); >>> + >>> +#endif /* _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H */ >>> diff --git a/kunit/Makefile b/kunit/Makefile >>> index 4e46450bcb3a8..c9176c9c578c6 100644 >>> --- a/kunit/Makefile >>> +++ b/kunit/Makefile >>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ >>> obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += test.o \ >>> string-stream.o \ >>> - assert.o >>> + assert.o \ >>> + try-catch.o >>> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += string-stream-test.o >>> >>> diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c >>> index 3cbceb34b3b36..ded9895143209 100644 >>> --- a/kunit/test.c >>> +++ b/kunit/test.c >>> @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ >>> */ >>> >>> #include <kunit/test.h> >>> +#include <kunit/try-catch.h> >>> #include <linux/kernel.h> >>> +#include <linux/sched/debug.h> >>> >>> static void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test) >>> { >>> @@ -162,6 +164,19 @@ static void kunit_fail(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_assert *assert) >>> WARN_ON(string_stream_destroy(stream)); >>> } >>> >>> +static void __noreturn kunit_abort(struct kunit *test) >>> +{ >>> + kunit_try_catch_throw(&test->try_catch); /* Does not return. */ >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * Throw could not abort from test. >>> + * >>> + * XXX: we should never reach this line! As kunit_try_catch_throw is >>> + * marked __noreturn. >>> + */ >>> + BUG(); >> >> >> I recall discussion on this. What's the point in keeping thie >> BUG() around when it doesn't even reach? It can even be a >> WARN_ON() in that case right? > > Originally I had BUG() here, and Frank (I think it was Frank, sorry it > was a while ago) told me it should be WARN_ON(). In v12 Stephen told > me it should be BUG(), and nobody objected so I went back to making it > a BUG() (note I also mentioned this change on the cover letter of v13 > and still no one objected). > Yeah. Sorry for the confusing advice. WARN_ON() or nothing is the right thing here. I have been cleaning BUG() and WARN_ON() that aren't needed. I would just delete BUG all together. thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:07 AM shuah <shuah@kernel.org> wrote: > > On 8/23/19 10:56 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:36 AM shuah <shuah@kernel.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Brendan, > >> > >> On 8/20/19 5:20 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote: > >>> Add support for aborting/bailing out of test cases, which is needed for > >>> implementing assertions. > >>> > >>> An assertion is like an expectation, but bails out of the test case > >>> early if the assertion is not met. The idea with assertions is that you > >>> use them to state all the preconditions for your test. Logically > >>> speaking, these are the premises of the test case, so if a premise isn't > >>> true, there is no point in continuing the test case because there are no > >>> conclusions that can be drawn without the premises. Whereas, the > >>> expectation is the thing you are trying to prove. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> > >>> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > >>> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> > >>> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> > >>> --- > >>> include/kunit/test.h | 2 + > >>> include/kunit/try-catch.h | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> kunit/Makefile | 3 +- > >>> kunit/test.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > >>> kunit/try-catch.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> 5 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > >>> create mode 100644 include/kunit/try-catch.h > >>> create mode 100644 kunit/try-catch.c > >>> > >>> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h > >>> index 6917b186b737a..390ce02f717b6 100644 > >>> --- a/include/kunit/test.h > >>> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h > >>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > >>> #define _KUNIT_TEST_H > >>> > >>> #include <kunit/assert.h> > >>> +#include <kunit/try-catch.h> > >>> #include <linux/kernel.h> > >>> #include <linux/slab.h> > >>> #include <linux/types.h> > >>> @@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ struct kunit { > >>> > >>> /* private: internal use only. */ > >>> const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */ > >>> + struct kunit_try_catch try_catch; > >>> /* > >>> * success starts as true, and may only be set to false during a test > >>> * case; thus, it is safe to update this across multiple threads using > >>> diff --git a/include/kunit/try-catch.h b/include/kunit/try-catch.h > >>> new file mode 100644 > >>> index 0000000000000..404f336cbdc85 > >>> --- /dev/null > >>> +++ b/include/kunit/try-catch.h > >>> @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ > >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > >>> +/* > >>> + * An API to allow a function, that may fail, to be executed, and recover in a > >>> + * controlled manner. > >>> + * > >>> + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC. > >>> + * Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> > >>> + */ > >>> + > >>> +#ifndef _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H > >>> +#define _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H > >>> + > >>> +#include <linux/types.h> > >>> + > >>> +typedef void (*kunit_try_catch_func_t)(void *); > >>> + > >>> +struct completion; > >>> +struct kunit; > >>> + > >>> +/** > >>> + * struct kunit_try_catch - provides a generic way to run code which might fail. > >>> + * @test: The test case that is currently being executed. > >>> + * @try_completion: Completion that the control thread waits on while test runs. > >>> + * @try_result: Contains any errno obtained while running test case. > >>> + * @try: The function, the test case, to attempt to run. > >>> + * @catch: The function called if @try bails out. > >>> + * @context: used to pass user data to the try and catch functions. > >>> + * > >>> + * kunit_try_catch provides a generic, architecture independent way to execute > >>> + * an arbitrary function of type kunit_try_catch_func_t which may bail out by > >>> + * calling kunit_try_catch_throw(). If kunit_try_catch_throw() is called, @try > >>> + * is stopped at the site of invocation and @catch is called. > >>> + * > >>> + * struct kunit_try_catch provides a generic interface for the functionality > >>> + * needed to implement kunit->abort() which in turn is needed for implementing > >>> + * assertions. Assertions allow stating a precondition for a test simplifying > >>> + * how test cases are written and presented. > >>> + * > >>> + * Assertions are like expectations, except they abort (call > >>> + * kunit_try_catch_throw()) when the specified condition is not met. This is > >>> + * useful when you look at a test case as a logical statement about some piece > >>> + * of code, where assertions are the premises for the test case, and the > >>> + * conclusion is a set of predicates, rather expectations, that must all be > >>> + * true. If your premises are violated, it does not makes sense to continue. > >>> + */ > >>> +struct kunit_try_catch { > >>> + /* private: internal use only. */ > >>> + struct kunit *test; > >>> + struct completion *try_completion; > >>> + int try_result; > >>> + kunit_try_catch_func_t try; > >>> + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch; > >>> + void *context; > >>> +}; > >>> + > >>> +void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, > >>> + struct kunit *test, > >>> + kunit_try_catch_func_t try, > >>> + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch); > >>> + > >>> +void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context); > >>> + > >>> +void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch); > >>> + > >>> +static inline int kunit_try_catch_get_result(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch) > >>> +{ > >>> + return try_catch->try_result; > >>> +} > >>> + > >>> +/* > >>> + * Exposed for testing only. > >>> + */ > >>> +void kunit_generic_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch); > >>> + > >>> +#endif /* _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H */ > >>> diff --git a/kunit/Makefile b/kunit/Makefile > >>> index 4e46450bcb3a8..c9176c9c578c6 100644 > >>> --- a/kunit/Makefile > >>> +++ b/kunit/Makefile > >>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ > >>> obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += test.o \ > >>> string-stream.o \ > >>> - assert.o > >>> + assert.o \ > >>> + try-catch.o > >>> > >>> obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += string-stream-test.o > >>> > >>> diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c > >>> index 3cbceb34b3b36..ded9895143209 100644 > >>> --- a/kunit/test.c > >>> +++ b/kunit/test.c > >>> @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ > >>> */ > >>> > >>> #include <kunit/test.h> > >>> +#include <kunit/try-catch.h> > >>> #include <linux/kernel.h> > >>> +#include <linux/sched/debug.h> > >>> > >>> static void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test) > >>> { > >>> @@ -162,6 +164,19 @@ static void kunit_fail(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_assert *assert) > >>> WARN_ON(string_stream_destroy(stream)); > >>> } > >>> > >>> +static void __noreturn kunit_abort(struct kunit *test) > >>> +{ > >>> + kunit_try_catch_throw(&test->try_catch); /* Does not return. */ > >>> + > >>> + /* > >>> + * Throw could not abort from test. > >>> + * > >>> + * XXX: we should never reach this line! As kunit_try_catch_throw is > >>> + * marked __noreturn. > >>> + */ > >>> + BUG(); > >> > >> > >> I recall discussion on this. What's the point in keeping thie > >> BUG() around when it doesn't even reach? It can even be a > >> WARN_ON() in that case right? > > > > Originally I had BUG() here, and Frank (I think it was Frank, sorry it > > was a while ago) told me it should be WARN_ON(). In v12 Stephen told > > me it should be BUG(), and nobody objected so I went back to making it > > a BUG() (note I also mentioned this change on the cover letter of v13 > > and still no one objected). > > > > Yeah. Sorry for the confusing advice. WARN_ON() or nothing is the right > thing here. I have been cleaning BUG() and WARN_ON() that aren't needed. > > I would just delete BUG all together. Alright, that's fine. I will send out a new patch set that removes this once we get the discussion on 01/18 resolved.
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 6917b186b737a..390ce02f717b6 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #define _KUNIT_TEST_H #include <kunit/assert.h> +#include <kunit/try-catch.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/types.h> @@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ struct kunit { /* private: internal use only. */ const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */ + struct kunit_try_catch try_catch; /* * success starts as true, and may only be set to false during a test * case; thus, it is safe to update this across multiple threads using diff --git a/include/kunit/try-catch.h b/include/kunit/try-catch.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..404f336cbdc85 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/kunit/try-catch.h @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * An API to allow a function, that may fail, to be executed, and recover in a + * controlled manner. + * + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC. + * Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> + */ + +#ifndef _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H +#define _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H + +#include <linux/types.h> + +typedef void (*kunit_try_catch_func_t)(void *); + +struct completion; +struct kunit; + +/** + * struct kunit_try_catch - provides a generic way to run code which might fail. + * @test: The test case that is currently being executed. + * @try_completion: Completion that the control thread waits on while test runs. + * @try_result: Contains any errno obtained while running test case. + * @try: The function, the test case, to attempt to run. + * @catch: The function called if @try bails out. + * @context: used to pass user data to the try and catch functions. + * + * kunit_try_catch provides a generic, architecture independent way to execute + * an arbitrary function of type kunit_try_catch_func_t which may bail out by + * calling kunit_try_catch_throw(). If kunit_try_catch_throw() is called, @try + * is stopped at the site of invocation and @catch is called. + * + * struct kunit_try_catch provides a generic interface for the functionality + * needed to implement kunit->abort() which in turn is needed for implementing + * assertions. Assertions allow stating a precondition for a test simplifying + * how test cases are written and presented. + * + * Assertions are like expectations, except they abort (call + * kunit_try_catch_throw()) when the specified condition is not met. This is + * useful when you look at a test case as a logical statement about some piece + * of code, where assertions are the premises for the test case, and the + * conclusion is a set of predicates, rather expectations, that must all be + * true. If your premises are violated, it does not makes sense to continue. + */ +struct kunit_try_catch { + /* private: internal use only. */ + struct kunit *test; + struct completion *try_completion; + int try_result; + kunit_try_catch_func_t try; + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch; + void *context; +}; + +void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, + struct kunit *test, + kunit_try_catch_func_t try, + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch); + +void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context); + +void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch); + +static inline int kunit_try_catch_get_result(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch) +{ + return try_catch->try_result; +} + +/* + * Exposed for testing only. + */ +void kunit_generic_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch); + +#endif /* _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H */ diff --git a/kunit/Makefile b/kunit/Makefile index 4e46450bcb3a8..c9176c9c578c6 100644 --- a/kunit/Makefile +++ b/kunit/Makefile @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += test.o \ string-stream.o \ - assert.o + assert.o \ + try-catch.o obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += string-stream-test.o diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c index 3cbceb34b3b36..ded9895143209 100644 --- a/kunit/test.c +++ b/kunit/test.c @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ */ #include <kunit/test.h> +#include <kunit/try-catch.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/sched/debug.h> static void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test) { @@ -162,6 +164,19 @@ static void kunit_fail(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_assert *assert) WARN_ON(string_stream_destroy(stream)); } +static void __noreturn kunit_abort(struct kunit *test) +{ + kunit_try_catch_throw(&test->try_catch); /* Does not return. */ + + /* + * Throw could not abort from test. + * + * XXX: we should never reach this line! As kunit_try_catch_throw is + * marked __noreturn. + */ + BUG(); +} + void kunit_do_assertion(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_assert *assert, bool pass, @@ -180,6 +195,9 @@ void kunit_do_assertion(struct kunit *test, kunit_fail(test, assert); va_end(args); + + if (assert->type == KUNIT_ASSERTION) + kunit_abort(test); } void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name) @@ -191,33 +209,122 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name) } /* - * Performs all logic to run a test case. + * Initializes and runs test case. Does not clean up or do post validations. */ -static void kunit_run_case(struct kunit_suite *suite, - struct kunit_case *test_case) +static void kunit_run_case_internal(struct kunit *test, + struct kunit_suite *suite, + struct kunit_case *test_case) { - struct kunit test; - - kunit_init_test(&test, test_case->name); - if (suite->init) { int ret; - ret = suite->init(&test); + ret = suite->init(test); if (ret) { - kunit_err(&test, "failed to initialize: %d\n", ret); - kunit_set_failure(&test); - test_case->success = test.success; + kunit_err(test, "failed to initialize: %d\n", ret); + kunit_set_failure(test); return; } } - test_case->run_case(&test); + test_case->run_case(test); +} +static void kunit_case_internal_cleanup(struct kunit *test) +{ + kunit_cleanup(test); +} + +/* + * Performs post validations and cleanup after a test case was run. + * XXX: Should ONLY BE CALLED AFTER kunit_run_case_internal! + */ +static void kunit_run_case_cleanup(struct kunit *test, + struct kunit_suite *suite) +{ if (suite->exit) - suite->exit(&test); + suite->exit(test); + + kunit_case_internal_cleanup(test); +} + +struct kunit_try_catch_context { + struct kunit *test; + struct kunit_suite *suite; + struct kunit_case *test_case; +}; + +static void kunit_try_run_case(void *data) +{ + struct kunit_try_catch_context *ctx = data; + struct kunit *test = ctx->test; + struct kunit_suite *suite = ctx->suite; + struct kunit_case *test_case = ctx->test_case; + + /* + * kunit_run_case_internal may encounter a fatal error; if it does, + * abort will be called, this thread will exit, and finally the parent + * thread will resume control and handle any necessary clean up. + */ + kunit_run_case_internal(test, suite, test_case); + /* This line may never be reached. */ + kunit_run_case_cleanup(test, suite); +} + +static void kunit_catch_run_case(void *data) +{ + struct kunit_try_catch_context *ctx = data; + struct kunit *test = ctx->test; + struct kunit_suite *suite = ctx->suite; + int try_exit_code = kunit_try_catch_get_result(&test->try_catch); + + if (try_exit_code) { + kunit_set_failure(test); + /* + * Test case could not finish, we have no idea what state it is + * in, so don't do clean up. + */ + if (try_exit_code == -ETIMEDOUT) { + kunit_err(test, "test case timed out\n"); + /* + * Unknown internal error occurred preventing test case from + * running, so there is nothing to clean up. + */ + } else { + kunit_err(test, "internal error occurred preventing test case from running: %d\n", + try_exit_code); + } + return; + } + + /* + * Test case was run, but aborted. It is the test case's business as to + * whether it failed or not, we just need to clean up. + */ + kunit_run_case_cleanup(test, suite); +} + +/* + * Performs all logic to run a test case. It also catches most errors that + * occur in a test case and reports them as failures. + */ +static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite, + struct kunit_case *test_case) +{ + struct kunit_try_catch_context context; + struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch; + struct kunit test; + + kunit_init_test(&test, test_case->name); + try_catch = &test.try_catch; - kunit_cleanup(&test); + kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch, + &test, + kunit_try_run_case, + kunit_catch_run_case); + context.test = &test; + context.suite = suite; + context.test_case = test_case; + kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, &context); test_case->success = test.success; } @@ -230,7 +337,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) kunit_print_subtest_start(suite); for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++) { - kunit_run_case(suite, test_case); + kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case); kunit_print_test_case_ok_not_ok(test_case, test_case_count++); } diff --git a/kunit/try-catch.c b/kunit/try-catch.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..55686839eb619 --- /dev/null +++ b/kunit/try-catch.c @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * An API to allow a function, that may fail, to be executed, and recover in a + * controlled manner. + * + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC. + * Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> + */ + +#include <kunit/test.h> +#include <kunit/try-catch.h> +#include <linux/completion.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/kthread.h> +#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h> + +void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch) +{ + try_catch->try_result = -EFAULT; + complete_and_exit(try_catch->try_completion, -EFAULT); +} + +static int kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter(void *data) +{ + struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch = data; + + try_catch->try(try_catch->context); + + complete_and_exit(try_catch->try_completion, 0); +} + +static unsigned long kunit_test_timeout(void) +{ + unsigned long timeout_msecs; + + /* + * TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): We should probably have some type of + * variable timeout here. The only question is what that timeout value + * should be. + * + * The intention has always been, at some point, to be able to label + * tests with some type of size bucket (unit/small, integration/medium, + * large/system/end-to-end, etc), where each size bucket would get a + * default timeout value kind of like what Bazel does: + * https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/be/common-definitions.html#test.size + * There is still some debate to be had on exactly how we do this. (For + * one, we probably want to have some sort of test runner level + * timeout.) + * + * For more background on this topic, see: + * https://mike-bland.com/2011/11/01/small-medium-large.html + */ + if (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs) { + /* + * If sysctl_hung_task is active, just set the timeout to some + * value less than that. + * + * In regards to the above TODO, if we decide on variable + * timeouts, this logic will likely need to change. + */ + timeout_msecs = (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs - 1) * + MSEC_PER_SEC; + } else { + timeout_msecs = 300 * MSEC_PER_SEC; /* 5 min */ + } + + return timeout_msecs; +} + +void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context) +{ + DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(try_completion); + struct kunit *test = try_catch->test; + struct task_struct *task_struct; + int exit_code, time_remaining; + + try_catch->context = context; + try_catch->try_completion = &try_completion; + try_catch->try_result = 0; + task_struct = kthread_run(kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter, + try_catch, + "kunit_try_catch_thread"); + if (IS_ERR(task_struct)) { + try_catch->catch(try_catch->context); + return; + } + + time_remaining = wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion, + kunit_test_timeout()); + if (time_remaining == 0) { + kunit_err(test, "try timed out\n"); + try_catch->try_result = -ETIMEDOUT; + } + + exit_code = try_catch->try_result; + + if (!exit_code) + return; + + if (exit_code == -EFAULT) + try_catch->try_result = 0; + else if (exit_code == -EINTR) + kunit_err(test, "wake_up_process() was never called\n"); + else if (exit_code) + kunit_err(test, "Unknown error: %d\n", exit_code); + + try_catch->catch(try_catch->context); +} + +void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, + struct kunit *test, + kunit_try_catch_func_t try, + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch) +{ + try_catch->test = test; + try_catch->try = try; + try_catch->catch = catch; +}