Message ID | 20200224143641.5851-1-jonathanh@nvidia.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | phy: tegra: xusb: Don't warn on probe defer | expand |
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:36:41PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > Deferred probe is an expected return value for tegra_fuse_readl(). > Given that the driver deals with it properly, there's no need to > output a warning that may potentially confuse users. > > Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> > --- > drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Kishon, I already have a couple of PHY subsystem patches from JC and Nagarjuna in a branch in the Tegra tree that I need to resolve a dependency. Do you mind if I pick this up into that branch as well and send it to you as a pull request later on? Say around v5.6-rc6? Alternatively you could provide an Acked-by and then I can take them all through ARM SoC. Thierry > diff --git a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c > index 84c27394c181..12d0f3e30dbc 100644 > --- a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c > +++ b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c > @@ -802,7 +802,9 @@ tegra186_xusb_read_fuse_calibration(struct tegra186_xusb_padctl *padctl) > > err = tegra_fuse_readl(TEGRA_FUSE_SKU_CALIB_0, &value); > if (err) { > - dev_err(dev, "failed to read calibration fuse: %d\n", err); > + if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER) > + dev_err(dev, "failed to read calibration fuse: %d\n", > + err); > return err; > } > > -- > 2.17.1 >
Hi Thierry, On 24/02/20 8:42 pm, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:36:41PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Deferred probe is an expected return value for tegra_fuse_readl(). >> Given that the driver deals with it properly, there's no need to >> output a warning that may potentially confuse users. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> >> --- >> drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Kishon, > > I already have a couple of PHY subsystem patches from JC and Nagarjuna > in a branch in the Tegra tree that I need to resolve a dependency. Do > you mind if I pick this up into that branch as well and send it to you > as a pull request later on? Say around v5.6-rc6? You can take this via Tegra tree itself. Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> -Kishon > > Alternatively you could provide an Acked-by and then I can take them all > through ARM SoC. > > Thierry > >> diff --git a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c >> index 84c27394c181..12d0f3e30dbc 100644 >> --- a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c >> +++ b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c >> @@ -802,7 +802,9 @@ tegra186_xusb_read_fuse_calibration(struct tegra186_xusb_padctl *padctl) >> >> err = tegra_fuse_readl(TEGRA_FUSE_SKU_CALIB_0, &value); >> if (err) { >> - dev_err(dev, "failed to read calibration fuse: %d\n", err); >> + if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER) >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to read calibration fuse: %d\n", >> + err); >> return err; >> } >> >> -- >> 2.17.1 >>
diff --git a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c index 84c27394c181..12d0f3e30dbc 100644 --- a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c +++ b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c @@ -802,7 +802,9 @@ tegra186_xusb_read_fuse_calibration(struct tegra186_xusb_padctl *padctl) err = tegra_fuse_readl(TEGRA_FUSE_SKU_CALIB_0, &value); if (err) { - dev_err(dev, "failed to read calibration fuse: %d\n", err); + if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(dev, "failed to read calibration fuse: %d\n", + err); return err; }
Deferred probe is an expected return value for tegra_fuse_readl(). Given that the driver deals with it properly, there's no need to output a warning that may potentially confuse users. Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> --- drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)