From patchwork Wed Mar 10 16:09:39 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kishon Vijay Abraham I X-Patchwork-Id: 1450586 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=23.128.96.18; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=cKQQte9h; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DwcX90XZ7z9sVS for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 03:11:37 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233326AbhCJQLD (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:11:03 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:51500 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233250AbhCJQKn (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:10:43 -0500 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 12AGAKgT127932; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:10:20 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1615392620; bh=xZP94/W6e+feo2IXbD5QHf0IlP942uGU++0kfiWPUQA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=cKQQte9h66p0BZQg0GzYo+D4kirMxlbVKoLIhPhty5upa+/3tO4pGrEBrm4IQCfk2 UipUvBysP/8TYHIlsXHjQqAim4vnEa1GTmiCKcDaIv8zzaCm1li4LLNUfNicVDJ5Oj XbPrFZ81D8DJoWVgYs5dMh+9ZRvfcUm6twKgXZgk= Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (dfle103.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.24]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 12AGAJWg093655 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:10:20 -0600 Received: from DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:10:19 -0600 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:10:19 -0600 Received: from a0393678-ssd.dhcp.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 12AG9qku100440; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:10:13 -0600 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , Jonathan Corbet , Rob Herring , Arnd Bergmann , Tom Joseph , Jingoo Han , Gustavo Pimentel , Marek Vasut , Yoshihiro Shimoda , Shawn Lin , Heiko Stuebner , Nadeem Athani CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman , , , , , , , , Lokesh Vutla Subject: [PATCH v4 3/7] PCI: endpoint: Add support to link a physical function to a virtual function Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 21:39:39 +0530 Message-ID: <20210310160943.7606-4-kishon@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20210310160943.7606-1-kishon@ti.com> References: <20210310160943.7606-1-kishon@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org While the physical function has to be linked to endpoint controller, the virtual function has to be linked to a physical function. Add support to link a physical function to a virtual function in pci-ep-cfs. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I --- drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c index f3a8b833b479..999911801877 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c @@ -475,6 +475,28 @@ static struct configfs_attribute *pci_epf_attrs[] = { NULL, }; +static int pci_epf_vepf_link(struct config_item *epf_pf_item, + struct config_item *epf_vf_item) +{ + struct pci_epf_group *epf_vf_group = to_pci_epf_group(epf_vf_item); + struct pci_epf_group *epf_pf_group = to_pci_epf_group(epf_pf_item); + struct pci_epf *epf_pf = epf_pf_group->epf; + struct pci_epf *epf_vf = epf_vf_group->epf; + + return pci_epf_add_vepf(epf_pf, epf_vf); +} + +static void pci_epf_vepf_unlink(struct config_item *epf_pf_item, + struct config_item *epf_vf_item) +{ + struct pci_epf_group *epf_vf_group = to_pci_epf_group(epf_vf_item); + struct pci_epf_group *epf_pf_group = to_pci_epf_group(epf_pf_item); + struct pci_epf *epf_pf = epf_pf_group->epf; + struct pci_epf *epf_vf = epf_vf_group->epf; + + pci_epf_remove_vepf(epf_pf, epf_vf); +} + static void pci_epf_release(struct config_item *item) { struct pci_epf_group *epf_group = to_pci_epf_group(item); @@ -487,6 +509,8 @@ static void pci_epf_release(struct config_item *item) } static struct configfs_item_operations pci_epf_ops = { + .allow_link = pci_epf_vepf_link, + .drop_link = pci_epf_vepf_unlink, .release = pci_epf_release, };