[-next] PCI: dwc: pci-dra7xx: Fix potential NULL dereference in dra7xx_pcie_probe()

platform_get_resource() may fail and return NULL, so we should
better check it's return value to avoid a NULL pointer dereference
a bit later in the code.

This is detected by Coccinelle semantic patch.

@@
expression pdev, res, n, t, e, e1, e2;
@@

res = \(platform_get_resource\|platform_get_resource_byname\)(pdev, t, n);
+ if (!res)
+   return -EINVAL;
... when != res == NULL
e = devm_ioremap(e1, res->start, e2);

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Hi,

On 27/04/20 4:40 pm, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> platform_get_resource() may fail and return NULL, so we should
> better check it's return value to avoid a NULL pointer dereference
> a bit later in the code.
> 
> This is detected by Coccinelle semantic patch.
> 
> @@
> expression pdev, res, n, t, e, e1, e2;
> @@
> 
> res = \(platform_get_resource\|platform_get_resource_byname\)(pdev, t, n);
> + if (!res)
> +   return -EINVAL;
> ... when != res == NULL
> e = devm_ioremap(e1, res->start, e2);
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> index 3b0e58f2de58..7a3d12f7e7d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> @@ -878,6 +878,9 @@ static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "ti_conf");
> +	if (!res)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));

I don't see why this should be devm_ioremap(). It should also have been
devm_ioremap_resource() which does the NULL check.

Alternately, how about using devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname()?

>  	if (!base)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 05:29:50PM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 27/04/20 4:40 pm, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> > platform_get_resource() may fail and return NULL, so we should
> > better check it's return value to avoid a NULL pointer dereference
> > a bit later in the code.
> > 
> > This is detected by Coccinelle semantic patch.
> > 
> > @@
> > expression pdev, res, n, t, e, e1, e2;
> > @@
> > 
> > res = \(platform_get_resource\|platform_get_resource_byname\)(pdev, t, n);
> > + if (!res)
> > +   return -EINVAL;
> > ... when != res == NULL
> > e = devm_ioremap(e1, res->start, e2);
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> > index 3b0e58f2de58..7a3d12f7e7d9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> > @@ -878,6 +878,9 @@ static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "ti_conf");
                                           ^^^^

> > +	if (!res)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> >  	base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
                            ^^^
> 
> I don't see why this should be devm_ioremap(). It should also have been
> devm_ioremap_resource() which does the NULL check.

It's different device pointers.

regards,
dan carpenter

On 28/04/20 6:37 pm, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 05:29:50PM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 27/04/20 4:40 pm, Wei Yongjun wrote:
>>> platform_get_resource() may fail and return NULL, so we should
>>> better check it's return value to avoid a NULL pointer dereference
>>> a bit later in the code.
>>>
>>> This is detected by Coccinelle semantic patch.
>>>
>>> @@
>>> expression pdev, res, n, t, e, e1, e2;
>>> @@
>>>
>>> res = \(platform_get_resource\|platform_get_resource_byname\)(pdev, t, n);
>>> + if (!res)
>>> +   return -EINVAL;
>>> ... when != res == NULL
>>> e = devm_ioremap(e1, res->start, e2);
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 3 +++
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>>> index 3b0e58f2de58..7a3d12f7e7d9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>>> @@ -878,6 +878,9 @@ static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>>  	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "ti_conf");
>                                            ^^^^
> 
>>> +	if (!res)
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>>  	base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
>                             ^^^
>>
>> I don't see why this should be devm_ioremap(). It should also have been
>> devm_ioremap_resource() which does the NULL check.
> 
> It's different device pointers.
> 

Sorry, I don't understand this comment... Currently we have:

static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
        struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
	...
	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "ti_conf");
        base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
        if (!base)
                return -ENOMEM;

Instead of the proposed patch, what I am asking is:

	base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "ti_conf");
	if (IS_ERR(base))
		return PTR_ERR(base);




> regards,
> dan carpenter
>

Oh.  Crap.  I'm sorry.  I misread the code.

regards,
dan carpenter